hale_bopp wrote:
No I don't like that idea.. I mean in the jail all members can post. But people being punished can only post there.
What about different different restictions for different offenses?
For example, people like "171NewYork" need to be quarantined to keep their insanity from contaminating the rest of the site (just like 171NewYork probably is righ now in real life). Then there's people like "Ghosthunter". While he didn't do anyhting wrong, at first he posted in reply to anything and evrything with messages that were extremely dificcult to understand. In his case, it might have been better if he had some sort of restriction to his number of posts instead while he received constructive feedback on his ettiquite.
hale_bopp wrote:
Quote:
The problem is that you have to then have a judge, jury, and executioner to determine if the crime merits a banning or a jailing. I would not want that job for anything.
I'd love it. I don't care what people here think of me.
No offense, but (I mean this in a constructive way):
You would be asking to arbitrarily wield powers that neither Alex nor any of the other moderators currently exercise. Furthermore, such a moderator would need to keep a cool head at all times and cannot go off on an obsessive-compulsive crusade to rid the internet of people that annoy them. Last of all, any lone individual taking on such a responsisbility would be at extreme risk for viruses sent in retalliation.