ASPartOfMe wrote:
That very specific disclaimer(s) are needed for an ASD forum seems self evident. When a person registers a set of rules,guidelines, and disclaimers should be displayed. After reading it the candidate should be given these choices: they understand and accept the guidelines, They do not understand some of the guidelines followed by a text box for questions, They do not wish to become a member.
That's "Website 101" philosophy -- abide by the rules or don't bother joining; but I'm not proposing any new rules.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
We have a group of members that distrust professionals while others believe only professional advice is legitimate. And there are others like me that believe there are advantages and disadvantages to both approaches. Right now as mentioned this is a peer driven site leaving the professional only group frustrated. Newbies seeking comfort and advice from peers are being steered towered professionals. While in my view being steered towered professionals is a good thing it may not be the what the newbie is seeking AT THIS TIME. The member may well be have an eventual goal of professional diagnosis but is at an early stage of inquiry or it is unaffordable.
I'm not trying to ban any form of unqualified diagnosis (even
self-diagnosis). What I am trying to do is suggest a disclaimer that will mitigate any potential legal or civil liability against Alex Plank or the moderators who represent him. Imagine what could happen if some self-appointed "expert" gave an unqualified diagnosis to someone seeking answers, and that the 'someone' became so distraught over what he or she was told that he or she committed suicide. Alex could be sued for being somehow negligent in providing a safe place for Aspies to seek advice.
With even a simple disclaimer of "Owner is not responsible for the behavior of this website's members", Alex could (theoretically) mitigate most (if not all) liability for someone else's unqualified diagnosis. Of course, he might still be subpoena-ed for evidence in an investigation and trial of a person whose unqualified diagnosis led to the suicide of a depressed individual.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
I do not know if such a thing is affordable or doable but if possible maybe we can have ASD specialist(s) answer questions or a specialist driven section to compliment the peer driven sections.
Such a specialist would have to perform at least one personal interview
in situ with a person before declaring that the person being interviewed indeed had an ASD.
All I'm trying to do is advise Alex and the moderators how they might best keep their posterior regions out of civil litigation.