How we deal with racism and hate speech on Wrong Planet
alex wrote:
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
I'm done being diplomatic.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
With all due respect, just a page earlier in this thread you posted the hail emoji ( ) in response to a comment that contains some blatantly ableist comments directed at me me so it makes me wonder.
While I understand that people may have issues with being called racist if it's unfounded, I think we can deal with figuring out how to prevent that from happening in a constructive manner.
I think the issue is the definition of the word racist has changed from meaning just a hateful person who genuinely believes that people of another race are inferior to meaning someone who says something or does something that is problematic to another race. For instance, a lot of people would say it's racist to use certain expressions that are unique to black culture even though obviously it's likely not coming from a bad place. Even saying "yas queen" as a white person would be viewed as racist by a number of black people.
Clearly the membership here is not as up-to-date with that shift in understanding as I thought and I do apologize for not realizing that I'm probably in a bubble working in the entertainment industry and living in a progressive coastal city. I think that would be a valid point to make regarding the new guidelines. It appears a lot of people still see the term racist in the older more specific tone. So that's a discussion we should have about it.
Oh for cripe's sake dude. Using my repost of someone else's comment (that I took as a reaction of pure frustration where the attacking words against you were in jest to get you to see how ridiculous this has become) to deflect your own ableist ideals is beyond the pale. For the record, I was praising Ferris for speaking frankly, but that's really not the point.
This is why I'm fed up. We try to express ourselves to you and you decide to focus on side stuff and ignore the main issues.
Regarding your comments on the definition of racism: The issue is actually that you can not prove someone's feelings towards other races, you have to go off evidence.
Please stop adding to the long list of things you believe are considered universally and unequivocally racist. It's becoming overwhelming. I would prefer to here these things from leaders of the civil rights or BLM movement, so that I know it's not just something privileged people have decided.
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
alex wrote:
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
I'm done being diplomatic.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
With all due respect, just a page earlier in this thread you posted the hail emoji ( ) in response to a comment that contains some blatantly ableist comments directed at me me so it makes me wonder.
While I understand that people may have issues with being called racist if it's unfounded, I think we can deal with figuring out how to prevent that from happening in a constructive manner.
I think the issue is the definition of the word racist has changed from meaning just a hateful person who genuinely believes that people of another race are inferior to meaning someone who says something or does something that is problematic to another race. For instance, a lot of people would say it's racist to use certain expressions that are unique to black culture even though obviously it's likely not coming from a bad place. Even saying "yas queen" as a white person would be viewed as racist by a number of black people.
Clearly the membership here is not as up-to-date with that shift in understanding as I thought and I do apologize for not realizing that I'm probably in a bubble working in the entertainment industry and living in a progressive coastal city. I think that would be a valid point to make regarding the new guidelines. It appears a lot of people still see the term racist in the older more specific tone. So that's a discussion we should have about it.
Oh for cripe's sake dude. Using my repost of someone else's comment (that I took as a reaction of pure frustration where the attacking words against you were in jest to get you to see how ridiculous this has become) to deflect your own ableist ideals is beyond the pale. For the record, I was praising Ferris for speaking frankly, but that's really not the point.
This is why I'm fed up. We try to express ourselves to you and you decide to focus on side stuff and ignore the main issues.
Regarding your comments on the definition of racism: The issue is actually that you can not prove someone's feelings towards other races, you have to go off evidence.
Please stop adding to the long list of things you believe are considered universally and unequivocally racist. It's becoming overwhelming. I would prefer to here these things from leaders of the civil rights or BLM movement, so that I know it's not just something privileged people have decided.
The issue is that racism is no longer viewed by everyone from the lens of intent. I think that distinction is where the disagreement comes from.
I honestly believe you're coming from a much more ableist position, implying that autistic people are unable to understand the nuance involved in conversations of race and need to be coddled from what is perceived as a personal attack but may not actually be one at all. Some of us may have more difficulty at first but all of these ideas and concepts are certainly accessible to those on the spectrum. And for those black autistics, racism, even the less obvious kind, is a lived experience they're well aware of.
_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social
alex wrote:
I honestly believe you're coming from a much more ableist position, implying that autistic people are unable to understand the nuance involved in conversations of race and need to be coddled from what is perceived as a personal attack but may not actually be one at all.
It is not ablesit to suggest that some people on the spectrum will never get the finer nuance involved in any conversation let alone race.
This seems to be some sort of elitist attitude that the less articulate are just open targets to the more articulate members.
f**k em , they are too thick to understand , lets just call them racists
And if it is deemed coddling to object to someone being called a racist , there are a lot of coddlers on this forum.
_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction
Last edited by Oh_no_its_Ferris on 25 Aug 2020, 3:59 pm, edited 1 time in total.
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist!
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
TheRobotLives wrote:
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist![/quote]
That exactly would be racist.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,541
Location: Long Island, New York
League_Girl wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist![/quote]
That exactly would be racist.
As an out of touch, ok boomer I would agree that wanting to raise taxes only on POC is racist opinion because it is an explicitly discriminatory thought.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 25 Aug 2020, 6:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 36,541
Location: Long Island, New York
alex wrote:
I see what you're saying and I totally get that. I think the issue I have is that people are calling for us to enact a rule about specifically choosing to treat the racist word in the way that not everyone views it. I do think choosing to make a hard and fast rule against it would be biased when it's clear not everyone views it that way. I also think it's problematic to police how black people talk about race as a white person so I don't feel comfortable with it from that angle as well...
Whatever it is somebody is going to disagree with it. The r-word is viewed as a slur and calling someone that will be viewed as a personal attack as per WP policy. Now apparently using the full word in any context will not be allowed. While I disagree with the all context part I agree that because many members have been called that and autism is often conflated with the r-word. Banning anything but euphemisms will prevent a lot more upset than it will create and thus I will somewhat reluctantly use euphemisms for slurs instead of actual slurs. IMHO and that of a number of longtime and respected members believe that allowing people to be called racist will cause a lot more upset not allowing it.
I am not sure how to solve this fundamental disagreement ATM. I do greatly respect that you have gotten out of your bubble and are trying to work out a solution. Most everybody is really trying to find a solution and desperately wants this site to stay together as do I. I will give you everybody time in the hope that somebody comes up with an idea that will get me out of my bubble that I can accept if not like.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Last edited by ASPartOfMe on 25 Aug 2020, 6:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ASPartOfMe wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist![/quote]
That exactly would be racist.
Out of touch, ok boomer I would agree that wanting to raise taxes only on POC is racist opinion because it is an explicitly discriminatory thought.
At least we both agree on something here.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
League_Girl wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist![/quote]
That exactly would be racist.
Out of touch, ok boomer I would agree that wanting to raise taxes only on POC is racist opinion because it is an explicitly discriminatory thought.
At least we both agree on something here.
If we get the green light, I will make the argument that all taxes are racist , because they take money away from POC (people of color) and give them to a system labeled as *white systemic racism*.
My economic liberal foes will collapse in the face of being called dirty word like RACIST.
_________________
Then a hero comes along, with the strength to carry on, and you cast your fears aside, and you know you can survive.
Be the hero of your life.
TheRobotLives wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
League_Girl wrote:
TheRobotLives wrote:
magz wrote:
It's not about banning the word, it's about treating "you're racist" as a personal accusation just like all other kinds of "you're a bad person".
Soon we'll all be calling each other racist based on our own lexicography.
You want to raise taxes on POC (people of color) and give it to a white racist system <--- You're a racist![/quote]
That exactly would be racist.
Out of touch, ok boomer I would agree that wanting to raise taxes only on POC is racist opinion because it is an explicitly discriminatory thought.
At least we both agree on something here.
If we get the green light, I will make the argument that all taxes are racist , because they take money away from POC (people of color) and give them to a system labeled as *white systemic racism*.
My economic liberal foes will collapse in the face of being called dirty word like RACIST.
So you are finally admitting that systemic racism does indeed exist.
_________________
Son: Diagnosed w/anxiety and ADHD. Also academic delayed and ASD lv 1.
Daughter: NT, no diagnoses. Possibly OCD. Is very private about herself.
On another note about your new rules Alex , are they retrospective as I believe one member has been permabanned for calling another member racist ?
If they are not retrospective you need to ban yourself
_________________
Release me from moral assumption
Total rejection total destruction
Last edited by Oh_no_its_Ferris on 25 Aug 2020, 5:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
alex wrote:
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
alex wrote:
AuroraBorealisGazer wrote:
I'm done being diplomatic.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
Alex, all of our attempts to reason with you have failed. There was I time I would have thanked you for creating the place where I met my husband, and found acceptance among people who share my struggles.
In the last few days you've made many deeply troubling comments that, among other things, promote ableism. I don't know where everyone else stands, but I personally don't feel comfortable with you speaking on our behalf as an ASD advocate.
You've lost the plot.
Furthermore, you harm the anti-racism and BLM movement by making sweeping generalizations, that will inevitably push people away from the ultimate goal.
Give admin powers to the mod team and let those who are better at this stuff address the community.
With all due respect, just a page earlier in this thread you posted the hail emoji ( ) in response to a comment that contains some blatantly ableist comments directed at me me so it makes me wonder.
While I understand that people may have issues with being called racist if it's unfounded, I think we can deal with figuring out how to prevent that from happening in a constructive manner.
I think the issue is the definition of the word racist has changed from meaning just a hateful person who genuinely believes that people of another race are inferior to meaning someone who says something or does something that is problematic to another race. For instance, a lot of people would say it's racist to use certain expressions that are unique to black culture even though obviously it's likely not coming from a bad place. Even saying "yas queen" as a white person would be viewed as racist by a number of black people.
Clearly the membership here is not as up-to-date with that shift in understanding as I thought and I do apologize for not realizing that I'm probably in a bubble working in the entertainment industry and living in a progressive coastal city. I think that would be a valid point to make regarding the new guidelines. It appears a lot of people still see the term racist in the older more specific tone. So that's a discussion we should have about it.
Oh for cripe's sake dude. Using my repost of someone else's comment (that I took as a reaction of pure frustration where the attacking words against you were in jest to get you to see how ridiculous this has become) to deflect your own ableist ideals is beyond the pale. For the record, I was praising Ferris for speaking frankly, but that's really not the point.
This is why I'm fed up. We try to express ourselves to you and you decide to focus on side stuff and ignore the main issues.
Regarding your comments on the definition of racism: The issue is actually that you can not prove someone's feelings towards other races, you have to go off evidence.
Please stop adding to the long list of things you believe are considered universally and unequivocally racist. It's becoming overwhelming. I would prefer to here these things from leaders of the civil rights or BLM movement, so that I know it's not just something privileged people have decided.
The issue is that racism is no longer viewed by everyone from the lens of intent. I think that distinction is where the disagreement comes from.
I honestly believe you're coming from a much more ableist position, implying that autistic people are unable to understand the nuance involved in conversations of race and need to be coddled from what is perceived as a personal attack but may not actually be one at all. Some of us may have more difficulty at first but all of these ideas and concepts are certainly accessible to those on the spectrum. And for those black autistics, racism, even the less obvious kind, is a lived experience they're well aware of.
Please refrain from putting those words in my mouth. I specifically cited my own experiences with nuance and using the wrong words as evidence that SOME of us continue to struggle with these things. I also noted that other people had been saying they also struggle with this. Do not attempt to twist this into ableism when it clearly isn't. Accept that your expectations that everyone here know every little double entendre or cultural nuance, particularly ones that are unique to your own microcosm, is unreasonable. And when we do get it wrong, you have demonstrated that it's okay to brand us as a racist without every taking the time to find out what we thought we were communicating, much I less trying to calmly explain why it was wrong. That's the part that is ableism. And I don't throw that word around lightly.
Let me be very clear because you still seem to be under the impression that I'm okay with racism. I will not tolerate racism here or anywhere else, but I'm also not going to accuse someone of being a racist without bothering to have a conversation with them about their offensive words or actions, and I will always try to explain to them why it's hurtful to others. But simply declaring someone a racist helps no one.
Would you like a resolution here it are you enjoying arguing with all of us?
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Hello from Michigan! New to Wrong Planet Forums |
02 Jan 2025, 12:07 pm |
Diane, 7:42am, December 13th. Entering the Wrong Planet. |
22 Jan 2025, 12:50 am |
Harris concession speech and call to Trump |
06 Nov 2024, 7:06 pm |
is there a way to the right planet? |
21 Jan 2025, 9:08 pm |