ReticentJaeger wrote:
mjay wrote:
geometrictunneling wrote:
So you guys would rather have the oudated, clunky, slow layout rather then this modern, clean and responsive layout?
...I am so irritated at all the responses in this thread...lol
it irritates me that you are irritated..because many answers are based on the brightness of the background and that is a perfectly legitimate comment.
Yeah...
Am I the only one who didn't have speed issues on the old site? I guess I did on my phone, but I
hate using the Internet on my phone anyway.
FWIW...
I went to an seminar about Web designing, and this Web site was used as an example as colors you should never use for a forum based Web page. (Old site). It was considered extremely fatiguing to the eyes. Or so says the powers that be...who make money off of seminars lol..
Actually the white is not bleach white, but I can see if you need to pot down the colors, the light blue and white can be overwhelming.
I hate to tell you, many Web sites are getting redone, especially if you make money off of Google ads. The rumor is one criteria of how high you are placed on search engines it -is the page mobile/tablet friendly, and how fast it can load up. The old WP stunk on both accounts. Buggy has hell on the mobile, and took forever to load up.
Mobile and tablets are starting to dictate design, as desktops are shrinking usage wise. I'm guessing on this board, people hang onto what they know and love.
I work for three different clients, and we are in the middle of redesigning their websites to be more tablet/mobile friendly, because their client base is shifting way from desk tops.