So threads are locked without even knowing who did it?

Post Reply New Topic

How much transparency does this site hate? Does it, like, create a voodoo doll with the word on it just because? Like, seriously?

Wikipedia even displays logs on moves. Even on a patrol of a page.

Why does this other 'WP' hate basic openness so much? Do you really absolutely do not want anyone to know who locked what? (And... just noticed a thread by pezar too, in addition to mine, locked with no name attached...)

How many more threads shall I create before someone with some sense relents and sees transparency is useful?

And I shall create more threads (until, of course, blocked by someone who still won't reveal their username), because transparency is a basic tenet I always aspire to, and the opposite could only be what totalitarians love.

Seriously, what are you afraid of?

If you, whoever that is, want to do something on this site, dare to show your name!

You can generally assume that the mod team is united on mod actions, particularly when no name is given.

I locked your thread. I edited your post explaining why. I think I can make it display who edited the post by leaving an edit reason rather than by editing directly. I'm also going to lock this one, because it is a minor variation on half a dozen other threads you have created. Please use existing threads rather than creating duplicates.