Character limit in thread titles. So frustrating!! !

Page 1 of 2 [ 22 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

27 Jun 2016, 10:02 pm

I noticed something that made WrongPlanet really frustrating to use: character limit in thread titles. It's something like 30 characters long. That's barely enough to put together a clunky phrase, let alone a descriptive complete sentence. In order to fit within the limit, I have to resort to text-speak, shorten the title to the point where it doesn't make sense, or write something similar that I don't have my mind set on. Or oftentimes, just forget about the thread altogether. It's a shame because some could have easily been great threads. What's an even bigger slap in the face is that spammers find a way to get around the character limit, because many of their thread titles are huge.

Mods/owners/programmers, can we PLEASE increase the character limit for thread titles? Not just for spammers, but for honest site members too.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,818
Location: Long Island, New York

27 Jun 2016, 11:15 pm

My thread titles are often range from incomplete, to hard to understand, to outright misleading because of this problem.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,786
Location: Stendec

28 Jun 2016, 6:16 am

A title is just that - a title. It is not the post, only a quick synopsis. Besides, it is easier for the users to adapt to the limits than it is to increase those limits. For instance, the title (subject) of this thread could just has easily have been "Do things my way, now!", which is much shorter and more directly to the actual point of this thread.



helloarchy
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 236
Location: Britannia

28 Jun 2016, 7:11 am

Yeah it really seems that you don't understand what a title is. The title for this thread could simply have been "Thread title limit". It's not supposed to be a phrase, and you shouldn't have to resort to text talk. The media don't do this with their headlines, so you shouldn't have to either. Please don't resort to clickbait headlines though, lol.



HCHCHC
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

Joined: 30 Apr 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 330
Location: f

28 Jun 2016, 8:12 am

Fnord wrote:
A title is just that - a title. It is not the post, only a quick synopsis. Besides, it is easier for the users to adapt to the limits than it is to increase those limits. For instance, the title (subject) of this thread could just has easily have been "Do things my way, now!", which is much shorter and more directly to the actual point of this thread.


Couldn't have put it better myself.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,818
Location: Long Island, New York

28 Jun 2016, 9:34 am

I can not speak for the OP but I am not ASKING for the charactor limit to be increased to the charactor limit of a post just from its current limit of 60 to say maybe 80

1. Most of us are not proffessional headline writers
2. WP is not a tabloid newspaper which are written at around a 4th grade level. Some topics here are quite sophisticated in nature and do need more charactors to explain the subject of the post in the most bare bones way.
3. If the title length is increased who is it going to hurt? Maybe a few language police who are obsessed with correct title length? If the proposed increase results in overly wordy titles it can be brought back to the way it is now. This should not be difficult to do. It should require a programmer to adjust the length of one field. This type of thing was done easily when I was programming 3 decades ago. If doing this on this software is going to cause numerous bugs or is difficult, this software is more screwed up then even I thought possible.


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,786
Location: Stendec

28 Jun 2016, 2:55 pm

"Subject Line Character Limit Too Short!"

There, that's not so frustrating, is it?



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

28 Jun 2016, 7:15 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
I can not speak for the OP but I am not ASKING for the charactor limit to be increased to the charactor limit of a post just from its current limit of 60 to say maybe 80.

THIS!

You pretty much read my mind. But so far, it seems like most people prefer titles to be super-short. Oh well, majority rules. But then again, a longer title length limit still lets people write short titles. A short limit precludes anything descriptive from being written.



Fnord
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 May 2008
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 60,786
Location: Stendec

28 Jun 2016, 7:44 pm

1. There is a difference between "Want" and "Need".

2. Those who speak the most words usually have the least to say.



ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,818
Location: Long Island, New York

29 Jun 2016, 6:44 am

Aspie1 wrote:
ASPartOfMe wrote:
I can not speak for the OP but I am not ASKING for the charactor limit to be increased to the charactor limit of a post just from its current limit of 60 to say maybe 80.

THIS!

You pretty much read my mind. But so far, it seems like most people prefer titles to be super-short. Oh well, majority rules. But then again, a longer title length limit still lets people write short titles. A short limit precludes anything descriptive from being written.


Alex Plank rules


_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity

“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

30 Jun 2016, 10:44 pm

So any possibility of getting the title length limit increased? Probably not, but nobody gets in trouble for asking.



Mootoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,942
Location: over the rainbow

27 Sep 2016, 12:09 pm

ASPartOfMe wrote:
I can not speak for the OP but I am not ASKING for the character limit to be increased to the character limit of a post just from its current limit of 60 to say maybe 80

1. Most of us are not professional headline writers
2. WP is not a tabloid newspaper which are written at around a 4th grade level. Some topics here are quite sophisticated in nature and do need more characters to explain the subject of the post in the most bare bones way.
3. If the title length is increased who is it going to hurt? Maybe a few language police who are obsessed with correct title length? If the proposed increase results in overly wordy titles it can be brought back to the way it is now. This should not be difficult to do. It should require a programmer to adjust the length of one field. This type of thing was done easily when I was programming 3 decades ago. If doing this on this software is going to cause numerous bugs or is difficult, this software is more screwed up then even I thought possible.


This. WP shouldn't encourage a Twitter-like curtness which results in an obese orangutan as a presidential candidate. Cheerleaders have no problem right now since they usually don't say much despite wasting a post for everyone.



slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

28 Sep 2016, 2:24 am

Aspie1 wrote:
So any possibility of getting the title length limit increased? Probably not, but nobody gets in trouble for asking.


Well, I guess you have your answer.


I agree that the limit is too restrictive, but of course, my opinion, like yours, has no meaning.


Another thing they don't give a flying f**k about is meaningless vague titles, I see them every day.

Eg. "Grrrrrr!!" or "what went wrong?"~~~2 current titles

Utterly meaningless rubbish.

A title needs to indicate to the reader the nature of the content or topic....what do those titles tell you?

:roll:



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

28 Sep 2016, 8:58 am

Looks like somebody bumped my thread. That's good! Maybe it'll get some attention, and the title length limit can go up to, say, 100. Anything is is better that making the thread title "Grrrr!! !" because a full description is impossible.



slave
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Feb 2012
Age: 111
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,420
Location: Dystopia Planetia

28 Sep 2016, 12:55 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
Looks like somebody bumped my thread. That's good! Maybe it'll get some attention, and the title length limit can go up to, say, 100. Anything is is better that making the thread title "Grrrr!! !" because a full description is impossible.


My pleasure. :D

I'm on a VERY strict (other) forum that has a MUCH longer limit and it isn't abused at all. I have even asked the Mods and it isn't a problem.

It's not like we are asking for the Moon and the Stars :lol:



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

28 Sep 2016, 1:24 pm

slave wrote:
I'm on a VERY strict (other) forum that has a MUCH longer limit and it isn't abused at all. I have even asked the Mods and it isn't a problem.
Same here. I shifted over to another discussion forum, at least for issues that aren't AS-specific. Because I got tired of editing my thread titles and running into CAPTCHA all the time (which has recently come back). They don't have a length limit. Virtually no one abuses it. Those who do, get dealt with quickly.

But this actually makes sense. Which most people refuse to stand for. Even aspie-friendly site owners, apparently.