alex wrote:
0_equals_true wrote:
I disagree it is necessarily about the hosting costs. This is not just about requests this is about handling them. It is not fair for those contributing to more and more expensive kit, when efficiency is not being looked at IMO
Seriously other sites with less resources and more traffic isn't like wading through molasses.
efficiency definitely is being looked at. although completely redesigning the architecture of the site is more expensive (in terms of the time required to do so) than adding more cpu resources .
Ok great. I don't think you have to redesign everything. There is no reason to change the format if you are happy with it. There are things you can do that could improve things that needen't take too long. The only reason why I might suggest using another format it is because there are forum formats that are a lot easier to develop and extend, so could save you you time. Some of these come with conversion scripts, to make it easier. Their extension are much easier to install there is no convoluted xml based installation bundles, or hacking about. Also they can have really good well supported and friendly extensions community.
Not everything can be solved with cpu resources. Even the most powerful of super computer cannot solve some of the more basic AI problems. Processing power alone is useless without efficiency.
If you want any help/advice let me know. I have posted some ideas to improve thing things archiving. I think this is a problem worth nipping in the bud now rather than later.