aleclair wrote:
I dropped an astronomy/astrophysics course this semester because the professor had a very haphazard teaching style and it was difficult to determine what I was supposed to get out of that class. People who are a million times smarter than I am say that I should have stayed in the class, never gone to the lectures, and simply read the textbook - because, apparently, that is the cool thing to do nowadays (I do NOT kid! It seems that in my upper division courses, attendance in class is something like 50 to 75%, yet people seem to do quite well. I assume that there is a purely social reason for this: it's seen as cooler to learn the material on your own, even if you (or your parents) are paying for you to attend classes). Yet I object, since the textbook we use was written for a descriptive astronomy class like the one I took in high school - there are absolutely no formulas, no theorems proven, etc.... So, how would the text help when it's a theoretical astrophysics course?
If I do want to minor in physics, there are a million billion other courses I could (and will) take in the future. So it's no big deal.
I dropped out of astrophysics too. I also dropped out of quantum physics cause I fell behind at the beginning of the course.