John_Browning wrote:
Majoring in women's studies is just a euphemism to explain to people that you screwed around in college and are now hopelessly unemployed.
No, not if you do it right. It is hard to do it right so it is better to minor in it. They can get jobs for corporations selling products to women, advisers for politicians who want the woman vote, etc.
zer0netgain wrote:
This is a "underwater basket weaving" for women curriculum. It was created to cater to feminists....it has little to no practical application in the workforce...and many young women have wasted their time obtaining such a degree.
It does have practical applications for the following on the top of my head; business, law, politics. Or places where it is expected that men and woman have equal footing but don't (STEM subjects).
I do agree it is a waste of time as a major, but it can be useful as a minor.
zer0netgain wrote:
You could take "women's studies" courses as electives, but don't make it your major or minor.
It is terrible to just take it as electives. You might as well not take it at all. It is a good idea to minor in it and major in a STEM subject. Many young woman were only able to finish the STEM subject because they were able to take classes that explained why STEM fields are harder for women to complete.
Edit: I found out from a friend that engineering is harder for women than for men because of something as simple as girls playing with the wrong toys during childhood. Boys play with things like legos, trucks, hotwheels, toy guns or toys that force you to do things and "to build" things while girls are encouraged for toys that are passive like barbies, dolls, dress up. So the boys have an advantage because those toys hardwire their brain "to do" and "to build" while girl's brains are hardwired to not do that yet.
Yep, it's as simple as that.