School is not education. Education is not school.
Do you agree or disagree? And why?
Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Personally, I think education does happen in schools, but it is not the best way to learn. It is a shame that kids are put into the system for most of their lives with little or no choice. I was home educated as a child which I'm very grateful for, mainly because school would not have benefited me as I had very severe autism early on in life. Unfortunately, most kids do not have the choice to be home educated, which I think is a great shame, but they're going to learn more in school than they would if they just sat at home and watched daytime television all day.
_________________
"The natural world is the greatest source of excitement; the greatest source of visual beauty; the greatest source of intellectual interest. It is the greatest source of so much in life that makes life worth living." David Attenborough
I think you are being very nice. The vast majority of schools provide the most pathetic way of learning. Do you agree with these definitions of school and education?
Using either definition, is it accurate to say that school provides education?
-Does school help a child learn the aims and habits of members of society?
-Does school help children become autonomous learners?
Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Schools are geared towards one type of personality and one style of learning. If you do not fall within that then you will have difficulty "learning." There are many different ways that people learn, but schools rarely take that into account, or implement various strategies.
_________________
?No great art has ever been made without the artist having known danger? ~ Rainer Maria Rilke
And what is the biggest barrier to new ideas of strategies? The centralization of education. Education needs to be decentralized. I'm not suggesting that we get rid of the US Department of Education, only that we decentralize the crucial aspects of decision making so that ideas proliferate rather than be squashed, which is what happens now in the current design of the American education systems.
Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:11 am, edited 1 time in total.
Using either definition, is it accurate to say that school provides education?
-Does school help a child learn the aims and habits of members of society?
-Does school help children become autonomous learners?
Well, I don't think most schools fall under Wikipedia's definitions, but unfortunately for many children it's the only way for them to really learn anything at all about the world. The idea of education and school is sound, but in practice it often falls flat, unfortunately.
_________________
"The natural world is the greatest source of excitement; the greatest source of visual beauty; the greatest source of intellectual interest. It is the greatest source of so much in life that makes life worth living." David Attenborough
Using either definition, is it accurate to say that school provides education?
-Does school help a child learn the aims and habits of members of society?
-Does school help children become autonomous learners?
Well, I don't think most schools fall under Wikipedia's definitions, but unfortunately for many children it's the only way for them to really learn anything at all about the world. The idea of education and school is sound, but in practice it often falls flat, unfortunately.
Hmm. How do you know that 'for many children it's the only way for them to really learn anything at all about the world?' Have you seen children learn in a different environment? And I'm not necessarily suggesting homeschooling. What I'm suggesting is that schools currently have no clue how to cause children to become autonomous learners and that they could. How? Well for starters, they could try. In America, much of the laws that are enacted regarding education, are not focused on education, but instead focused on politics. 'No child left behind' was a political stunt. There was no evidence that eluded to the idea that 'No child left behind' actually could work. In fact, all the evidence pointed to the fact that it won't work. But the law got passed anyway because of politics (and because politicians currently don't pay attention to the evidence).
Education must be child-centered rather than society-centered. We must take children seriously, for the good of the children.
TCS (Taking Children Seriously) is the true parenting/educating theory. Its primary ideas are below (http://curi.us/1540-taking-children-seriously):
- No Authorities (ideas must be judged on their merit, not their source; therefore, children can be right and can't be automatically dismissed)
- Coercion is the state of two or more personality strands being expressed in different options of a single choice so that one cannot see a way to choose without forsaking some part of his personality.
- Coercion is bad for knowledge growth, and quite simply hurts people, including children
- Common Preferences, coercion-free solutions to problems, are always possible
- This means, quite literally, that there is a possible way of parenting/educating in which children do not do anything against their own will
- An important part of getting what one wants is changing what one wants to better desires, including more relisable ones
- Once we realise changing what we want to better wants is good, we no longer need fear always getting what we want as being spoiled or immoral -- as long as we improve our desires sufficiently it would only be good
- What people want is subject to morality, and thus children won't want horrible things, as long as parents/teachers offer sufficiently good moral theories
- Good ideas beat out bad ones in argument (and thus if parent's/teacher's moral theories really are better than their rivals, parent/teacher won't lose argument)
- If your ideas are so great, have some faith in them to stand up to criticism!
- Criticism is good. Criticism is a gift. Cherish criticism
- Abandonment Parenting/Teaching is morally wrong (parents/teachers have an obligation to help their children)
- Advice Advice Advice (parents/teachers should give children lots of advice, but children should be free to disagree)
- Don't Hurt Children (I can't say this enough)
- And most importantly: send all children to Hebrew School (joking)
Last edited by rombomb2 on 13 Dec 2011, 9:00 am, edited 1 time in total.
H. P. Lovecraft was an autonomous learner. School made him a nervous wreck so he dropped out. He wasn't able to complete high school.
I really firmly believe in the decentralization of education, as someone else said... but more than that get rid of education 'standards'
Being hired and working should only be between you and an employer. A 'degree' shouldn't mean anything it is a piece of paper. People should be able to get jobs from being tested by employers .
I really firmly believe in the decentralization of education, as someone else said... but more than that get rid of education 'standards'
Being hired and working should only be between you and an employer. A 'degree' shouldn't mean anything it is a piece of paper. People should be able to get jobs from being tested by employers .
I am an employer. And I couldn't care less about degrees. I can measure whether an interviewee is an autonomous thinker in just 1 in-person meeting. Degrees are worthless. I don't even ask questions about them during the interview process.
But if you are going to earn a degree, make it something that will be challenging and further your capacity for learning. I majored in Physics and basically minored in Math, Chemistry, and Biology. If I were to do it all over again, I would have also minored in Philosophy. These fields, or rather my practicing of learning in the context of these fields, has helped me immensely. My ability to learn increased dramatically.
Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
I do agree that the secondary school system (High School for those of you in the U.S.) is flawed. I think it's based on a very old system of thought; one that doesn't take into account the multiplicity of people and methods of learning.
However, if you can get through it, and do well; manipulate it to your needs; college/university is a great break from that. I'm in 3rd year of my degree, and by now we have sufficient levels of knowledge to go on our own paths, and research whatever we want, while retaining the critical skills from the first two years. It's very freeing.
My degree is very good, but I wish I had learned this lesson when I was a teenager instead of lashing out against the school system (though that lashing out has its merits too).
However, if you can get through it, and do well; manipulate it to your needs; college/university is a great break from that. I'm in 3rd year of my degree, and by now we have sufficient levels of knowledge to go on our own paths, and research whatever we want, while retaining the critical skills from the first two years. It's very freeing.
My degree is very good, but I wish I had learned this lesson when I was a teenager instead of lashing out against the school system (though that lashing out has its merits too).
Why did you lash out? Is it because you hated it? Why did you hate it? Its because the system was NOT designed with you as the benefactor. It was designed with "society" as the benefactor. It was designed so that you would 'fit' nicely and squarely into society. Is that what we want for our children? To be 'fit' into society? Did it work on you? No. You lashed out because that is the kind of behavior that results from such a design. The design of a school system should be child-centered, not society-centered.
Last edited by rombomb2 on 15 Dec 2011, 3:12 am, edited 1 time in total.
Oh, I agree absolutely. It seems to me a very destructive system. College is worth it; although in recent years - in Ireland anyway - it's being made more like school, which is obviously a market-based move. This is bad.
I was very into the idea of changing the system as a teenager - I used to get books on it. It might be something I come back to if my career brings me there.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Are You an Autistic Student in Higher Education? Share Your |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |
Are You an Autistic Student in Higher Education? Share Your |
31 Dec 1969, 7:00 pm |
Trump Moves to Establish 'Patriotic Education' in Schools |
Today, 7:28 am |
School b+ student |
15 Nov 2024, 9:32 am |