IQs and College

Post Reply New Topic

I seem to notice these days that theyre are alot of people who are geniuses in College(as in Graduated High school early, Running Start, or other programs),then there are the type who are smart, dont have to study, then ther are the type who joke around their entire time, then there is the learning disabled people who might be viewed as "slow", then there's the type who are geniuses but fail miserably school, and finally we have the type that arent good at tests and get labeled as 'slow'.
I seem to notice that MOST colleges go off of a IQ testing/structure, why is this?

The American college system never did make any sense to me.

In England it's your course results that matter, and while we do have SATS (although we pronounce them as sats, not S.A.Ts.) there are specific tests for specific subjects and the last time we have them is in year 9 (and they're thinking of removing that).

I seem to notice that MOST colleges go off of a IQ testing/structure, why is this?

It is because it is the easiest way to evaluate a student. It is, by no means, the best. I have a wonderful, unfounded theory that it is how colleges disqualify otherwise fully capable poor students. Income and how well you do on a test are both interrelated. Never mind that there are students who just don't test well, but they do incredible projects pertaining to his or her area of study.

Intelligence is a quality not a quantity, so I never understood how IQ tests worked.

I've never heard of a college asking for IQ tests.

All the colleges I applied to wanted to see course work, SATs and involvement (in that order).

As for why there are people who don't have to study? Some people have gifts. There are subjects I am sleep through and do well, there are subjects I struggle with.

As for why geniuses fail at school? Simple. They are bored. Our education system doesn't do enough to challenge the talented kids. (In fact, where I went to school, they did away with any programs to help the smart kids because it made the dumb kids sad.)

Intelligence is not understood, and this is something that is excepted by the neurology, psychology, and sociology worlds, but not well known in the rest of the world, such as in the educational world. So when we put a numerical measure on it, we're just being arbitrary. It's like if we're all seeing who can run the fastest and we just go by the common measure for fastness. So let's say that most people seem to be able to run Y fast; that means that running X fast is "slow" and running Z fast is "super fast". It's a stupid way to categorize ability, let alone intelligence, but no one has yet come up with a better way.

WE know that this is a flawed system because there are people on WP who speak eloquently with professionally tested IQs of like 48. This happens because although some things are simple for them, other things are very hard. And the "normal control" is always a neurotypical person, whose brain may work entirely different. I know someone with a professionally tested IQ of 175 (so he said). He just had a regular job and didn't seem to have any special abilities. He didn't even know he was on the spectrum (he was).

Another very important thing to remember is that IQ tests (like ALL tests) are culturally biased, so this means that if you are from a different culture, uneducated, educated in an alternate way, or have a problem understanding culture because of another reason (literal thinking etc), you will not score very well on a test as a culture savvy person. For example, if you have a disadvantaged 11 year Black kid from Baltimore who is in remedial classes because he hasn't been to school enough to keep up, and he spends his days being recruited by a gang- if you take this kid and give him a test that involve questions about a yacht or croquet, will he understand that? Probably not, and he may be scored as "slow" even though he might be near-genius.