Board index › Administration › Stats

People online (please contribute to this thread)

Page 2 of 2 [ 26 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Previous topic | Next topic

Do you want me to post the graph when I'm done?
Poll ended at 03 Sep 2011, 4:11 pm
Yes 85%  85%  [ 17 ]
No 0%  0%  [ 0 ]
I don't care 15%  15%  [ 3 ]
Total votes : 20

lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,789
Location: Somerset UK

26 Sep 2010, 3:27 pm

Stonecold wrote:
lau wrote:
Stonecold wrote:
lau wrote:
....


Again, I have methods to compensate for all of that.

You have no idea what percentage of the "Online now" count are web crawlers.


Again, you are assuming the only variable I have is the "Online now" that people submit. I have many other sources for required variables. One of them is Wrong Planet's robots.txt policy. If you want to know more details about this "graph" I'm making, PM me. If not, please stop assuming that my test is flawed just because you don't know all the details of it.

Of what use is you looking at robots.txt? It (the WP one, which uses none of the non-standard extensions) does nothing to limit the number of connections made (each of which constitutes a guest, and figures in the "online" count).


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


Stonecold
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Kern County, CA

26 Sep 2010, 4:19 pm

lau wrote:
Stonecold wrote:
lau wrote:
Stonecold wrote:
lau wrote:
....


Again, I have methods to compensate for all of that.

You have no idea what percentage of the "Online now" count are web crawlers.


Again, you are assuming the only variable I have is the "Online now" that people submit. I have many other sources for required variables. One of them is Wrong Planet's robots.txt policy. If you want to know more details about this "graph" I'm making, PM me. If not, please stop assuming that my test is flawed just because you don't know all the details of it.

Of what use is you looking at robots.txt? It (the WP one, which uses none of the non-standard extensions) does nothing to limit the number of connections made (each of which constitutes a guest, and figures in the "online" count).

I understand that. Would you please stop assumming that my logic is flawed just because you don't know every last detail of my experiment? As for robots.txt, knowing Wrong Planet's robots exclusion policy will allow me to estimate the probability that certain web crawlers are part of the "Online now" count.



lau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jun 2006
Age: 75
Gender: Male
Posts: 9,789
Location: Somerset UK

27 Sep 2010, 4:25 am

Stonecold wrote:
...
I understand that. Would you please stop assumming that my logic is flawed just because you don't know every last detail of my experiment? As for robots.txt, knowing Wrong Planet's robots exclusion policy will allow me to estimate the probability that certain web crawlers are part of the "Online now" count.

I'm afraid you still do not understand the problem. The WP robots.txt (http://www.wrongplanet.net/robots.txt) has no real exclusion policy - just an (apparently) slightly less restricted policy for Google's Adsbot, whose adverts give Alex the major part of his funding. There is no question of estimating which "certain" web crawlers happen to be present - the question is how many "guest" connections each one makes. Adsbot makes dozens of simultaneous connections.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt


_________________
"Striking up conversations with strangers is an autistic person's version of extreme sports." Kamran Nazeer


zena4
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jan 2009
Age: 64
Gender: Female
Posts: 6,054

27 Sep 2010, 4:31 am

I'm really on line and I'm not a robot.

It's 11:30 here and we're GMT +2 (as I think the winter hour is not activated yet).

587 people on line now - at least, the screen says so.



Psychopompos
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2010
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 617
Location: France

27 Sep 2010, 6:24 am

Date : September 27th 2010 - 1:23 PM
Timezone : UTC+1
Online : 639


_________________
Alum dare, dolere, id Hephaestus, id ire / Pro profundis fati / Pro pulchris infernarum profundis / Pro pulchris omni fati brachium / Pulchris profundis infernarum servi fati / Profundis, profundis fati


Stonecold
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Kern County, CA

27 Sep 2010, 3:50 pm

lau wrote:
Stonecold wrote:
...
I understand that. Would you please stop assumming that my logic is flawed just because you don't know every last detail of my experiment? As for robots.txt, knowing Wrong Planet's robots exclusion policy will allow me to estimate the probability that certain web crawlers are part of the "Online now" count.

I'm afraid you still do not understand the problem. The WP robots.txt (http://www.wrongplanet.net/robots.txt) has no real exclusion policy - just an (apparently) slightly less restricted policy for Google's Adsbot, whose adverts give Alex the major part of his funding. There is no question of estimating which "certain" web crawlers happen to be present - the question is how many "guest" connections each one makes. Adsbot makes dozens of simultaneous connections.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots.txt

The robots.txt policy only gives me a VERY rough reference. You're right in saying that my logic would be flawed if I were to take into account only Wrong Planet's Robots Exclusion Policy. However, that isn't the only variable that I'm using. You seem to be the only one here who has a problem with the method I'm using. If you want to hear a detailed explination of my methods, please PM me. Otherwise, please stop wasting my time.



Science_Guy
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Jul 2010
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 506

01 Oct 2010, 10:31 pm

October 1st 11:30 PM
Timezone: Eastern
People online: 853



alex
Developer
Developer

User avatar

Joined: 13 Jun 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 10,216
Location: Beverly Hills, CA

01 Oct 2010, 10:38 pm

Alexa guesses traffic based on people who use their Alexa toolbar as a statistical sample. To get an accurate view of the traffic, use quantcast:
http://www.quantcast.com/wrongplanet.net


lau wrote:
There is utterly no point in posting your time zone - although you could always post your whole address, if you wanted people to know where you lived.

The post time is perfectly adequate - and no way could you "compensate" to obtain any useful data from any time and/or time zone embedded in the post.

Also... to gather a year's graph, you could just visit this site four times:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wrongplanet.net



NB. You do need to "compensate" for the many web crawlers that are present among the "Online Now: 652". In fact, only the "Members: 125" is vaguely reliable.


_________________
I'm Alex Plank, the founder of Wrong Planet. Follow me (Alex Plank) on Blue Sky: https://bsky.app/profile/alexplank.bsky.social


Stonecold
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jan 2010
Age: 27
Gender: Male
Posts: 568
Location: Kern County, CA

08 Oct 2010, 12:25 pm

alex wrote:
Alexa guesses traffic based on people who use their Alexa toolbar as a statistical sample. To get an accurate view of the traffic, use quantcast:
http://www.quantcast.com/wrongplanet.net


lau wrote:
There is utterly no point in posting your time zone - although you could always post your whole address, if you wanted people to know where you lived.

The post time is perfectly adequate - and no way could you "compensate" to obtain any useful data from any time and/or time zone embedded in the post.

Also... to gather a year's graph, you could just visit this site four times:
http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/wrongplanet.net



NB. You do need to "compensate" for the many web crawlers that are present among the "Online Now: 652". In fact, only the "Members: 125" is vaguely reliable.

This doesn't give a good enough temporal resolution.



Withdrawn
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 7 Jan 2010
Gender: Female
Posts: 399
Location: Sweden

10 Oct 2010, 8:22 am

Date: 10/10/2010 (GMT +1 hour)
Time: 3:22 PM
Online: 680


_________________
Best regards,
Withdrawn.