AshTrees wrote:
Thelibrarian wrote:
AshTrees wrote:
The last time I filled in a job application form there was also what is known as a "recrutiment monitering" form attached. On this form you tick the correct boxes so people can know your age/gender/religion/ethinic origin/ sexual orientation...what?
You get four choices:
Bisexual
Lesbian or gay
Hetrosexual
Not Disclosed
In the end I ticked not disclosed. I consider myself asexual and I know there's plenty of us.
Should there be an asexual box?
My inclination would be to write in: My sex life is none of your damn business. But that wouldn't get you the job. If jobs weren't so scarce, I would advise you to look for employment that respects your right to privacy. Under these less than auspicious circumstances, I would do whatever is most likely to land you the job, which would be to check anything other than heterosexual or undisclosed.
Thank you. I already I have the job. I was just thinking back.
If you suspect what you witnessed was a backhanded approach for affirmative action, my guess is that you are right.
I had the same thing happen to me when I was graduating from library school. A group of us, including a black classmate, attended the job fair at the state library convention being held. The way it worked was that you filled out one very detailed application, then you were assigned a number, and you merely submitted your number for the jobs you were interested in, and the prospective employer would attach whether they were interested to your number.
Well, several of my white classmates and I got very discouraged by the rejections. So, as an experiment, we got our black classmate's number, and submitted his number just to see what the reaction would be. Would you believe that every single employer that rejected us was frantically eager to talk to him? Several went so far as to attach personal notes begging for the opportunity just to interview him. As for the rest of us--well--we had to find jobs the old-fashioned way, which meant lots of rejection.