Negotiating salaries vs. high living costs
Is it generally permissible or encouraged to ask for a salary for which one can easily afford a house in a city with higher costs of living?
Or would I be making the same amount of money on the West Coast or the Northeast that I would make in Houston?
Example: Home ownership in Houston requires a $65,000/year salary, but requires a 6-figure income on much of the West Coast ($112K in Seattle, $150K in San Jose, and over $200K in San Francisco).
Should I assume that a $65,000/year job in Houston will automatically pay the aforementioned salaries in the other cities listed?
_________________
Who’s better at math than a robot? They’re made of math!
Now proficient in ChatGPT!
Look up salary reports on Glassdoor or Comparably for your area. Generally if you get hired in a specific area you get a salary commensurate with that location. Remote hire is a bit trickier to negotiate, but you can usually tell what the range is for a fair salary quote by doing research on one of those two sites.
Affording a house, I should note, is a bit more problematic in salary negotiations than affording general cost of living. I'd suggest basing your suggested salary on cost of living for your region since there are a lot more things factored into that (food, utilities, whatever). Best Places is a good site for figuring that out.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
high maintenance |
24 Aug 2024, 10:06 pm |
Can I finish high school online? |
08 Sep 2024, 3:43 pm |
Georgia High School Mass shooting |
24 Sep 2024, 8:57 am |