I haven't codified these models, but they're just a way of better understanding intentions. I learn to classify people by their type of personality (joker, manipulator, easy-going, serious, etc.) and then can logically deduce the intention behind some of the more ambiguous things they say. When a joker tells somebody that I've been doing a terrible job, his personality, coupled with the reaction of the person he's talking to, lets me know that he's just kidding. When a known manipulator compliments my work, I know that he likely has an ulterior motive. It's not perfect and there's always the problem of first classifying the personality, but it seems to be helpful.
The main limitation is that it's not an especially deep analysis. For example. a joker may only be kidding, but sometimes the jokes are tinged with various undercurrents, like jealousy or annoyance. I think it's this layer of meta-emotions that I usually miss. I do sometimes have a sense for when I'm getting 'mixed signals' so to speak, but I can't always determine what they are. I just try not to cultivate professional relationships with people who are often deceptive or misleading in their speech.