TwilightPrincess wrote:
This argument is utterly absurd. People can be jackasses no matter their gender. I can't say that I've experienced much in the way of privilege as a middle-aged, white woman compared to the white men in my life.
I've tried to be pretty clear that I'm not talking about randos who lose their s**t in public, I'm focusing on the meaning discussed in those articles, people who engage in this:
Quote:
This strategy is weaponised when a white woman uses this visible sadness or distress to portray themselves as a victim in a conflict situation, often derailing the actual argument and leading to the vilification of Black people.
I'm not sure what your entire argument with me even has to do with that meaning. You don't challenge it as a valid meaning, you just pivot away from it back to the more widespread one despite me trying to make it clear that was the only meaning I was interested in.
There's going to be a need to label that sort of behaviour and the people who engage in it for as long as people who engage in it exist. I don't care what label is applied to it, but as long as it exists, it will need a shorthand way to describe it.
funeralxempire wrote:
What's wrong with having negative views of racist white women? We should be hostile towards women who seek to use the damsel in distress card to cause problems for members of minority groups going about their day-to-day lives.
Remember, ^
that's where the entire argument began,
that's what you're being hostile towards.
_________________
When a clown moves into a palace, he doesn't become king, the palace becomes a circus.
"Many of us like to ask ourselves, What would I do if I was alive during slavery? Or the Jim Crow South? Or apartheid? What would I do if my country was committing genocide?' The answer is, you're doing it. Right now." —Former U.S. Airman (Air Force) Aaron Bushnell
Last edited by funeralxempire on 24 Jun 2023, 6:41 pm, edited 1 time in total.