zer0netgain wrote:
. . . As a rule, disclosure is only "beneficial" if it's quite obvious something isn't right with you and the lack on their understanding will just ensure you won't be hired. In this case, disclosure might test their open-mindedness and give you a shot. . . .
This seems pretty good to me. Kind of a way to 'continge' the social situation. That is, participating in the social interaction in a nonperfect, 'feel and texture' way.
If it becomes obvious that the person feels uncomfortable and isn't going to extend a job offer, then perhaps play the disability card, and as zer0netgain puts it, test their open-mindedness.
But this is not the situation initially described by izmyaspieshowin, who did well at the interviews. I'd say it then becomes an ongoing situation with co-workers (if hired, and even with a positive interview, there might be three or four other people who also had positive interviews, so it's still a numbers game) and I'd say disclose in medium, bite-sized steps, and see how the person reacts. For a co-worker is merely a potentially friendly co-worker at the start, you need to see how they react (and I for one need to remind myself of this from time to time).