SocOfAutism wrote:
Sounds like you may have gotten it! Let us know!
Trying to make eye contact might have been good enough. You wouldn't have wanted to bore your eyes into their souls either.
Some years back as a psych student I compiled a set of studies that in aggregate compared:
1. amount of eye contact
2. perceived aggressiveness of interviewee
3. interviewer's Myers-Briggs
4. position offered
5. success or fail from the interviewee's POV (ie did they get the job)
Basically, the results were somewhat common sensical in that for jobs that require following directions with low autonomy, appearing submissive-but-competent was the successful tact, while those that need autonomy and blustering (ie sales) rewarded a much more aggressive stance. The interesting thing to me as an Aspie was that once you get to the "aggressive = good" level it gets really tricky to measure as there are so many more variables to account for. Too aggressive / dominant and the interviewer feels threatened; too little and they don't feel you are "competitive" enough; you become incompetent in their eyes. People who did well at that end of the scale had extremely fine tuned social skills as they had to immediately and dynamically assess the interviewer with every interaction. And for the most successful (ie best match) it appeared to be completely unconscious/unintentional.
_________________
“For small creatures such as we the vastness is bearable only through love.”
―Carl Sagan