Who worries about their child's future?
If Matthew can't work due to his autism, he'll probably wind up on SSI. Right now I don't have any idea where to look as far as assisted living for him is concerned, and I might have to put him on a list NOW to get him someplace 10 years from now.
We have Medicaid and private health insurance that help pay for Matthew's therapies. However, we get Medicaid through a special waiver that allows parents of "medically fragile" kids to qualify for Medicaid even when they make too much money to qualify outright. (If any of you have heard of the Katie Beckett waiver, this is what we have.) Every year, we have to submit paperwork showing our income and assets, and Matthew's pediatrician has to submit paperwork explaining his condition. Twice since 2003 (when we first qualified) we have been denied Medicaid. Once was when the criteria in our state were changed and nearly 2,000 families lost Medicaid as a result. We began the appeals process and fortunately, we were reinstated. The other time was when we turned in paperwork to the wrong place, and when we turned in paperwork to the right place, it was turned in too late. It took me e-mailing the head of the division to get our Medicaid reinstated.
I'm in school right now so I can get a job to make enough money so we won't have to rely on Medicaid again. I am tired of being held hostage to a system that depends on funding that may or may not be there. Our state is experiencing a severe budget shortfall right now and several counties are cutting their education spending. I fear it may only be a matter of time before the Medicaid program gets cut.
My husband makes about $50,000 as a government worker. *Every* time he has tried to get another job or get some sort of lateral transfer, it has not worked out. The only way I know of to make sure that Matthew has what he needs is for me to go to work. But school has proved to be much more difficult that I anticipated. I'm in court reporting/captioning, and I cannot advance any farther in the program until I pass two more speed tests. I write at around 100 WPM. The first certification test of any sort I can take is at 180 WPM. And I have been stuck at 100 WPM for over ONE YEAR.
I keep thinking that everything would have been OK if Matthew just didn't have autism. Maybe I could have stayed home and been a full-time mom and enrolled Matthew in Boy Scouts or Little League or whatever. Instead, I wind up taking him to speech every week and worrying about if he'll be able to live independently. It wasn't supposed to be like this.
I'm a little confused. If your husband works for the government, doesn't your family have decent medical coverage through his job? What exactly is the Medicaid providing that employer provided health insurance won't?
Your last paragraph also reminds me of what I hear often, about the "cost" of autism and, maybe it's because my son is so high functioning, but I have yet to be convinced that the expense is necessary; I am not convinced that it is a waste, just concerned that it isn't what it is sold to be. We have spent extra money on higher quality swim lessons, some counseling we might not have otherwise done, childcare services past the age most parents need to - but not much else. The reason I bring that up is because I often find myself wondering how much parents are talked into spending v. how much they really need to spend. There is a whole industry making money off of autism, and a whole group of parents setting aside dreams and getting frustrated to pay them, and it some cases the expense creates no benefit that is real at all, but it definitely creates stress in families. I am outside of all that, not following the norms, and am happy that I am doing right by my child. It is always worth looking at and challenging assumptions and conventional wisdom, especially when following them makes your life difficult. I worry that parents are sold a false bill of goods, and it takes away from their ability to spend time with and appreciate their kids. Don't our kids need us more than specialists? I am not saying any of it is wrong; I don't know how each piece plays out for each unique child; but I think given the stress it causes families it would be good for more people to take a hard look at it. If the benefits were clear, wouldn't regular health insurance pay for it? These are all valid questions, but there is so much momentum in the world of autism treatment that they don't get asked.
I've read your descriptions of your son and I see a child who has pretty good odds of being fine. He is moving forward and growing up. Differently than other kids, but doing it. Believe in him. And in yourself.
There may come a time when you have to accept custodial care or a group home for him, but you are still far, far from that, based on what I've read. If he is going to have a future, you have to believe that he will.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
The reason we have Medicaid in addition to private insurance is because the private insurance *only covers therapy up to a certain point*. When Matthew had both OT and Speech therapy, his benefits ran out in about October. Speech is $45 per half hour and OT is $110 per hour and he got speech every week and OT every week. (He's no longer getting OT because he's improved enough to not need it on a weekly basis.) We are allotted 75 visits per year for this type of therapy, and when we were doing speech AND OT, OT counted as one visit and speech counted for one visit--which used up 2 visits a week. Multiply by 52 and you get 104 therapy sessions. That's 29 sessions that are not covered by insurance and which we would have had to pay for out of pocket. Things ARE a little bit easier now that he is not doing OT. All of Matthew's sessions would be covered by the combination of private insurance and Medicaid.
If we did not have Medicaid to pick up the rest of the payments, we would be paying about $20 per session, which comes out to $1040.00 each year. In addition to speech, we are also seeing a naturopath which neither insurance NOR Medicaid pays for (and we knew that going in). I have seen improvments in Matthew's speech since we've been working with her. That runs anywhere from $200-$300 a month.
I recently worked out the budget for our family, and our expenses come to about $100 LESS than my husband's monthly salary. That is not much of a cushion. And that doesn't completely take into account unexpected expenses or cost-of-living increases. We have decent savings but we aren't putting anything away for an IRA except for what gets taken out automatically from DH's salary. $50,000 in this day and age does not go as far as it used to.
Also, there are people who have insurance that covers NO autism treatment. When we first started taking Matthew to speech therapy, we were paying the entire sum out of pocket because we were on an HMO and a) the place recommended wasn't in our network, and b) they covered a grand total of TWO MONTHS of speech. I didn't want to take Medicaid. I didn't want to take government help. But one year of paying for speech out of pocket nearly broke us financially and we have never recovered from it.
To sum it up, without Medicaid at this point in our lives, we would be facing very slow bankruptcy. But the Medicaid system itself is *also* facing slow bankruptcy, and the only way I know of to make sure that we can pay for therapy in the future is for me to go back to work. I chose captioning because it's reasonably flexible and I can be available to Matthew when necessary and also bring in a decent income.
Medicare and Social Security are also going to have the same problems. Matthew might qualify for SSI when he turns 18, but if the system goes bankrupt, who's going to pay for what he needs? I don't trust Social Security to be around when I turn 65 or 70. Neither does my husband. So right now we're doing what we can to try and make sure that we put enough away to pay for what we need and what Matthew is going to need.
You asked, "If the benefits were clear, wouldn't regular health insurance pay for it?" The answer is a loud, resounding NO in many cases. I pointed out earlier that the HMO we used to have only paid for two months of speech therapy. There are insurance plans that won't pay for Applied Behavior Analysis, which is a *proven* therapy for autism. There are parents who have banded together and convinced certain states to pass laws that would require group health plans to cover autism (South Carolina is one that comes to mind). Apparently the benefits for autism therapy were not clear enough for those particular group health plans to cover it.
Does this clear up things any better?
Edited to add: Most families who have Medicaid *and* group health use Medicaid as secondary insurance. This is what many families do when both parents work--they use one insurance company as primary and another one as secondary.
Yes, thanks. I didn't mean to doubt you, just ... sometimes it gets mindboggling to realize the different experiences people have. When I think of insurance not covering autism, I tend to assume we're talking some of the fringe stuff that many parents find necessary, not the cores like speech and OT. I, personally, wouldn't have chosen the naturopath, but that is me.
But that raises the next question: I've never found out how much speech and OT our insurance would cover because my son is getting these through the school. Do most districts provide this once the right box is checked on the IEP?
We cleared out our savings when my son was a toddler, before knowing he was on the spectrum, because I had client committments and he wouldn't do group care. We had to hire a private nanny. That was a tough choice, because it certainly begged the question of if I should keep working part time at all. I don't blame autism for it; these tough choices are just part of life. Versions of it happen to everyone.
Point being, there is this kind of treadmill we find ourselves on, and we really need to ask over and over: are the choices we are making really necessary? I honestly am not so sure they are. There is, as I said, so much momentum in all of it, and that can clutter our thinking. I am mostly suggesting that you try to see what your life and choices might look like if you could step out of the circle and see it all fresh.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
Katie_WPG
Velociraptor
Joined: 7 Sep 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Female
Posts: 492
Location: Winnipeg, MB, Canada
But that raises the next question: I've never found out how much speech and OT our insurance would cover because my son is getting these through the school. Do most districts provide this once the right box is checked on the IEP?
We cleared out our savings when my son was a toddler, before knowing he was on the spectrum, because I had client committments and he wouldn't do group care. We had to hire a private nanny. That was a tough choice, because it certainly begged the question of if I should keep working part time at all. I don't blame autism for it; these tough choices are just part of life. Versions of it happen to everyone.
Point being, there is this kind of treadmill we find ourselves on, and we really need to ask over and over: are the choices we are making really necessary? I honestly am not so sure they are. There is, as I said, so much momentum in all of it, and that can clutter our thinking. I am mostly suggesting that you try to see what your life and choices might look like if you could step out of the circle and see it all fresh.
The question of therapy is really dependant on the child. While it's true that some children on the spectrum benefit from speech, OT, PT, behavioural therapy, sensory integration, ABA, IBI etc, just enrolling a child in all sorts of therapies that will end up costing nearly 100K/year "because he/she's on the spectrum" is a short-sighted and expensive decision.
Many of the therapies are required due to co-morbid conditions or symptoms that may be particular to that child. Just because one family has a child with co-morbid conditions, it doesn't mean that a child with a plain ASD will need that therapy.
It would be beneficial to advise parents to think carefully about their child's strengths and weaknesses before enrolling them in therapy.
I do worry about my boy's future. In the night time when I lie awake. At work. Riding my bike. Driving the car. Washing the dishes. Eating dinner.
When do I not worry? I don't know, it consumes my thoughts at the moment. It was good at work today, I had a big problem that took several hours of hard work to get fixed, in that time I got to forget about it.
But that raises the next question: I've never found out how much speech and OT our insurance would cover because my son is getting these through the school. Do most districts provide this once the right box is checked on the IEP?
We cleared out our savings when my son was a toddler, before knowing he was on the spectrum, because I had client committments and he wouldn't do group care. We had to hire a private nanny. That was a tough choice, because it certainly begged the question of if I should keep working part time at all. I don't blame autism for it; these tough choices are just part of life. Versions of it happen to everyone.
Point being, there is this kind of treadmill we find ourselves on, and we really need to ask over and over: are the choices we are making really necessary? I honestly am not so sure they are. There is, as I said, so much momentum in all of it, and that can clutter our thinking. I am mostly suggesting that you try to see what your life and choices might look like if you could step out of the circle and see it all fresh.
When you asked "Do most districts provide this once the right box is checked on the IEP?"
Well our school district gave us a 1/2 hour of speech twice a week and 1/2 hour of OT twice a week.They never offered anything else.My insurance company covers up to 50 some therapy sessions a year (speech and OT or PT sessions can not total more than 50 in a year altogether) and the copay for each session is $35.However when they are billed,if anything is coded anything relating to or for the treatment of autism-it isn't covered period! It can be developmental delay or receptive speech disorder but nothing related to autism.Therapies like ABA etc.. are not covered.Personally right now I am going to put my son in a social skills group that runs 5 weeks in the summer-one hr a week.He'll go to preschool for 4 weeks -2 days a week 9-12pm in the summer too.To give him something else to do in the summer and for the experience.I'm not sure right now what extent to use outside therapies.My son is only 3 and I'm new at this so I'm not sure how much is enough or how much is too much.
we had OT, speech, gross-motor skills and everything free in the school district program. now i regret that it wasn't free because it was just wasted time.
after one year of speech every single day his english proficiency came as 1 (the lowest). i just want to caution people that time flies and it ios very valuable to find people who are able to figure out the right approach.
EDIT: after DWs post I need to correct myself: make sure the approach is bearing fruit weather it is "professional" or your own. our own experience with "professionals" is really bad, for now.
Last edited by AnotherOne on 15 Mar 2010, 10:49 pm, edited 2 times in total.
The sum of it seems to be this: I've heard stories of "success" from people using all sorts of professional therapies, as well as from parents who did none of the above and simply spent quality time working with their child in the ways their instincts told them to. I've heard stories of "no improvement" from families who have gone broke trying. What I want to tell parents is bascially what you will hear about selecting a preschool: there is no one-size fits all approach, and you have to make the choices that seem to be the best for your unique family. The surest way to fail is to fall prey to "every says D is the best" and choose it, even when it feels wrong to you, or you are not sure the benefit is worth the cost. You should not stress yourself out to the point of having no ability left to just share joy with your unique child. If therapies are doing that to you, drop them - I firmly believe the child needs the best of his parents more than he needs any therapy. And if you have a high functioning child, find out from him what is working - my son knows which therapies he likes and feels are helpful, and which ones he finds wasteful.
_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).
I agree with DW. I have chosen to take advantage of the free therapy that my son gets from special needs pre-k. That is it. He is almost 5 now. From 1-3 yrs, we did do ST,PT,OT---some of it was through early intervention, some of it was ran through insurance since my son has hypotonia (low muscle tone) it was coded that way, and it was paid for.
I learned so much from watching the therapists work with him in the beginning, and I also read alot and come to WP for advice. I have been very cautious so far about any treatments other than therapy or school. My son's biggest deficit now is interacting with his peers. So guess what? I take him where other children will be as much as possible.(park,library, day care drop offs sometimes, birthday parties, etc... ) and work on his social skills as much as I can. He already loves adults, so working with a therapist on his social skills doesn't make much sense to me. I did do a social skills class last summer (4 sessions at $50/session.) I wasn't sure if I saw improvement, and I could have gone to the park for free!!
I guess I do have an advantage since I am not working right now, and only have 1 child, so I realize it is probably harder for some moms who work. But, I think just spending as much time loving and working with your child teaching him about the world, will do a world of good!
DenvrDave
Veteran
Joined: 17 Sep 2009
Age: 59
Gender: Male
Posts: 790
Location: Where seldom is heard a discouraging word
Doesn't it make you crazy that you worry? I have a 15 yo NT daughter and a 12 yo AS son. I have no fears about her future, and many about his. Truth is, he is doing pretty well. He has what he considers friends, he isnt bullied, he does decently (not great) in school. He needs more reminders and help to get through his day, but overall he isnt in bad shape, all things considered.
And yet, I worry about his future. I worry mostly for the social aspects (I think he will do all right professionally). But just when I consider things are in a bad way, he amazes me with some new development. Last night, when his grandmother was flying home, he hugged her. He has NEVER initiated a hug with her, though is very attatched. Bear in mind, he does hug people, and even likes to, but he has never been the one to initiate it without prompting.
This year he developed his first real crush on a girl, and it turned school around for him. He loves going now, if for all the wrong reasons lol.
Things get worse on occasion, but sometimes he takes a great, unexpected leap forward into new territory and makes real progress. Don't write off your AS-HFA-PDDNOS kid, without these kids we would not have much of the science, music, art, medicine we use everyday. We have great kids on our hands...worry, but don't let it destroy you. Let if fuel you to get them all the opportunities they need to make it, and they can do it with a bit of faith and a lot of hard work.
Thanks for sharing that MNJIm---I feel like my son's story could go either way, so I do my best to have hope for his future. I have really tried to just enjoy his toddler and pre/k years instead of worrying all the time. It is a struggle, but I make a conscious effort. He is my only one, so I want to have some joy from it and not let my days just be consumed with worry. I don't think any parent is sure how thier child's future will turn out. Even kids that have no issues and have great parents and a good upbringing, sometimes go in the wrong directions and their lives don't turn out so well. So I think maybe our children will have just as good a chance as any if we just keep our faith and hope!
I understand completely. You were ready for parenthood but not this type of parenthood.
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Facing my past to have a future |
26 Sep 2024, 1:32 pm |
Child locked in storage bin in unsanitary home |
06 Sep 2024, 9:20 am |
My nightmare child. A rant. Don't need/expect advice. |
01 Nov 2024, 9:15 am |