hoegaandit wrote:
Interesting that the study showed positive effects for hyperactivity and stimming. But the numbers used were so small (13) that this would have no statistical relevance, and be indicative only. Wonder if this has been replicated with a much larger and more valid study?
On thinking about it, OP's query has the same problem. Asking any individual if the omega 3 helped with hyperactivity in any particular instance is likely statistically meaningless, as other factors may have led to the decrease in hyperactivity in that individual, even if the observations are correct.
So properly carried out scientific studies would be the best and really only relevant guide.
I agree with your evaluation.
However clinical studies involving autism are notoriously difficult to obtain sufficient numbers of parents who have children suitable for a clinical utility study that will be agreeable to sign the participation forms.
I have read a peer reviewed paper involving the utility of cognitive behavior therapy in reducing depression in HFA teenagers where the number of subjects was only 5!!
Kids on the spectrum have so many confounding and comorbid conditions that finding kids suitable for a study is going to be problematic if you are intending to control internal as well as external variables.