Well, we went in to talk to the principal again. BAsically we made our case against his special ed program and the teacher, and she responded with another request for another meeting-with the special ed teacher, the psychologist and the director of special ed (of that school)
Things that were denied to us are now being used against us; ie He has the need for a 1-1 aide in his IEP, we were told that TUSD doesn't provide them (but they do) and wouldn't in Pop's case. Now when we complain that he didn't have special ed supervision, they reply, "But he doesn't have 1-1 aide in his IEP, he's 'fully included'."
The problem, to us, isn't the specified manhours spent on Pop, it's the knowledge. Knowing that 3 hours is a long time, a long bus ride, in close quarters-the special ed teacher should know what Pop needs to be successful. She replies that I should have told her his specific problems and needs. He's autistic, while the kids are different the accomodations are pretty much the same general things; schedule, preparation, check up, awareness that he's talking to other kids (that he routinely has problems with), an adult in arm's reach.
The principal brought up that Pop is unique in being fully included, while under the auspice of special ed. I brought up that I specifically asked last year if they had special ed children that were fully included, "was there a graduation to independence with accomodations?" They answered yes, in fact there was a boy who was fully included and ate lunch in a special room to avoid sensory overload. The principal's reply to this was, "but he wasn't like Pop, he didn't have his behaviors".
But he still had needs!! !! That's just what I was saying in someone's thread, the quiet ones get passed through and no one thinks that they need to do anything for them.
So, really, besides going on record one more time, I don't see us getting anywhere with these people.