Do parents respect bad kids more?

Page 9 of 15 [ 235 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 ... 15  Next

magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

18 May 2019, 11:33 am

Shaming you for not sleeping was not normal. Your parents showed obvious control freak symptoms.

I didn't sleep in the same bed as my parents but in the same room - we had only one room to use.
It always took me ages to fall asleep. My mother remembers once waking up in the middle of the night to discover everyone was asleep except for the little me. I was telling myself a fairy tale of my own invention.
I remember things in the room turning into monstrous shapes but I wasn't afraid - but it might just be my unusual way of processing fear.

My daughters shared a bed when they were very little but it didn't work out - one of them moves a lot in her sleep and the other is extremely easy to wake. Now they have separate loft beds in a shared small room. They often fall asleep in my bed and then I carry them to their room. We sometimes sleep together when my husband is absent but otherwise we just can't fit in one bed ;)


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

18 May 2019, 11:54 am

magz wrote:
Shaming you for not sleeping was not normal. Your parents showed obvious control freak symptoms.
That's the whole point of this thread. Me being a "good kid" (read: docile) became a license to ramp up expectations to unreachably high levels. Because hey, what recourse would I have? None! Now, if I were a bad kid, my parents would be grateful that I'm saying "thank you" after dinner and not destroying stuff. "Expectations", like falling asleep quickly enough, wouldn't even be on the radar.

magz wrote:
I remember things in the room turning into monstrous shapes but I wasn't afraid - but it might just be my unusual way of processing fear.
I remember this too. 8O Although my visions were more like seeing the room get progressively darker and darker until it went pitch black, even with my eyes open, which would jar me awake. Lather, rinse, repeat. This didn't happen every night, but many. Although to be honest, I was more scared of the chandelier in the hall and being caught awake. My room wasn't even that dark. Our condominium faced a city street, so the streetlights usually shined into my window. Although one night, when the streetlights didn't come on, that's when it was scary.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

18 May 2019, 12:01 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
magz wrote:
Shaming you for not sleeping was not normal. Your parents showed obvious control freak symptoms.
That's the whole point of this thread. Me being a "good kid" (read: docile) became a license to ramp up expectations to unreachably high levels. Because hey, what recourse would I have? None! Now, if I were a bad kid, my parents would be grateful that I'm saying "thank you" after dinner and not destroying stuff. "Expectations", like falling asleep quickly enough, wouldn't even be on the radar.

The problem was about them, not you.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

20 May 2019, 2:54 pm

Do you ever actually read anything I write? It really seems like you did not in this thread. I spent a lot of time on thoughts you clearly failed to absorb in any form.

You start from incorrect assumptions about the majority of parents, and that makes all your speculation moot in my opinion. You presume to know us, but you do not, and you aren't exhibiting any willingness to listen. Its really frustrating.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

20 May 2019, 2:59 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
magz wrote:
The photo of the puppies gives me another thought. In Western culture, it is commonly believed that every child should have their own room. The Japanese are adamant on quite an opposite thought: they advocate for parents sleeping with their children until school age.
When a whole family was assigned one room, they had no choice but to sleep together in this room.
My Aspie daughter suffers from nightmares. She gets better if there is someone she can hug.

I'm actually against co-sleeping. My parents tried it once and only once, when I was 5 or 6. Like most aspie kids, I had trouble falling asleep. My parents, on the other hand, fell asleep the minute their heads hit the pillow. So I kept tossing and turning, and waking them up. They were furious! They yelled at me to stop moving, "sleep already!", and even grabbed my stuffed dog from my hands and threw it across the room. I eventually fell asleep by 1:00 AM (I could see the clock on my parents' nightstand), with dried-up tears on my face. The co-sleeping experiment was abandoned and never spoken of again. That didn't stop them from coming in to check up on me, and shaming me if they saw me awake. I quickly got good at watching the doorknob like a hawk, and pretending to be asleep whenever I heard it turning. I imagine if I were an actual bad kid, as opposed to "bad" for failing to meet the sleep expectations, I'd be treated with more respect; my sleep simply wouldn't be a priority.

What I do fully support is co-bedding---that's having same-age siblings or even close friends share a bed (as little kids, that is). Like that puppy pile. Or if that's a bridge too far for American parents, at least sharing a small room. I'd sell my soul to have had that as a child. Because everybody knows that monsters (or chandeliers) only target kids who sleep alone. They get intimidated by seeing multiple kids in one bed or even one room. Not to mention, when an adult says "there are no monsters", it sounds like a trite, cheap platitude; but when same-age child says that, it's much more believable.


Both my kids loved sleeping with us when they were little. My son always begged for me to crawl in with him (we learned fast it was better for me to go to him than allow him to keep my husband up; that boy was squiggly!).

My kids shared a room for a long time. I agree that it is silly to force kids to sleep alone; it isn't natural for most. I learned that from my little sister, who was the only one of us 3 sisters to have her own room from infancy. As soon as she was old enough, she toddled over to one of our rooms and crawled in.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

26 May 2019, 9:45 am

DW_a_mom wrote:
Do you ever actually read anything I write? It really seems like you did not in this thread. I spent a lot of time on thoughts you clearly failed to absorb in any form.

You start from incorrect assumptions about the majority of parents, and that makes all your speculation moot in my opinion. You presume to know us, but you do not, and you aren't exhibiting any willingness to listen. Its really frustrating.
Yes, I read your posts defending the conventional family unit. As much as I want to, I can't agree with any of them. It's far, far too easy to justify excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake) as "caring", "knowing better", and "wanting the best for the child" :roll: :roll:. As expected, good kids get the brunt of it. Being left alone and free is what constitutes respect in my beliefs, and only bad kids usually get that. Hence, "respect more".

What's sadly ironic is that Russia, our Cold War nemesis that allegedly tampered with the 2016 elections and has a poor mental healthcare system, actually created an aspie-friendly environment for good kids to grow up in (those communal apartments, that is). Think about it: There were very few cases of childhood anxiety when such apartments were around. (As opposed to today in the US, where every family cocoons itself from the big, bad outside world, kids are gobbling up Prozac like M&Ms.) Granted, it was driven by Communist Party politics and housing shortages, rather than by concern for good kids. But the unintended result is astonishing, and will never happen in the US. (It was dismantled 30 years later, by a mass construction, so each family could have its own apartment.) Today, communal apartments continue to exist in Russian cities to a limited extent, but only among college students and poor elderly persons, not families with kids.



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

26 May 2019, 10:08 am

Aspie1 wrote:
Yes, I read your posts defending the conventional family unit. As much as I want to, I can't agree with any of them. It's far, far too easy to justify excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake) as "caring", "knowing better", and "wanting the best for the child" :roll: :roll:.

How is "conventional family unit" equated to "excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake)"?
Those are two independent factors.
What happened in your nuclear family is not the norm.
Face it, your parents were freaks.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

26 May 2019, 10:48 am

magz wrote:
How is "conventional family unit" equated to "excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake)"?
Those are two independent factors.
Because... Excessive expectations and arbitrary rules happen only in conventional families, both nuclear and extended. They don't happen in Mutual Adoption Clubs, because the child can just move in with another family. They don't happen in communal apartments, because the child can get around it by leveraging another family living there.

Now, I tried talking to my therapist about what my family was doing. She just mocked me by rubbing it in my face, rather than teach me to assert myself. This had to do with her job title: she was a family therapist. "Family" means "adults". So she was helping them, not me. I was just too naive to realize it, thinking "family" meant "everyone in the home".



magz
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jun 2017
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 16,283
Location: Poland

26 May 2019, 12:15 pm

I've never seen a mutual adoption club working.
In shared apartaments, fights between families and arbitrary restrictions do occur.


_________________
Let's not confuse being normal with being mentally healthy.

<not moderating PPR stuff concerning East Europe>


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

28 May 2019, 12:26 am

Aspie1 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Do you ever actually read anything I write? It really seems like you did not in this thread. I spent a lot of time on thoughts you clearly failed to absorb in any form.

You start from incorrect assumptions about the majority of parents, and that makes all your speculation moot in my opinion. You presume to know us, but you do not, and you aren't exhibiting any willingness to listen. Its really frustrating.
Yes, I read your posts defending the conventional family unit. As much as I want to, I can't agree with any of them. It's far, far too easy to justify excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake) as "caring", "knowing better", and "wanting the best for the child" :roll: :roll:. As expected, good kids get the brunt of it. Being left alone and free is what constitutes respect in my beliefs, and only bad kids usually get that. Hence, "respect more".

What's sadly ironic is that Russia, our Cold War nemesis that allegedly tampered with the 2016 elections and has a poor mental healthcare system, actually created an aspie-friendly environment for good kids to grow up in (those communal apartments, that is). Think about it: There were very few cases of childhood anxiety when such apartments were around. (As opposed to today in the US, where every family cocoons itself from the big, bad outside world, kids are gobbling up Prozac like M&Ms.) Granted, it was driven by Communist Party politics and housing shortages, rather than by concern for good kids. But the unintended result is astonishing, and will never happen in the US. (It was dismantled 30 years later, by a mass construction, so each family could have its own apartment.) Today, communal apartments continue to exist in Russian cities to a limited extent, but only among college students and poor elderly persons, not families with kids.


Very specifically, did you read my April 7th post on page 9?

Isolated family units are only a problem when you have bad parents.

Communal living would have been horrible for both my kids. Being around people has always increased the frequency of my son's meltdowns and anxiety. He is drawn to people, but it stresses him out. We figured that out by the time he was 4. Periods of high social exposure always had to be followed by alone time in one of his safe places. How would he get that in a crowded living situation?

Every child is different. It is the job of the parents to figure out what that means. Clearly, your parents did not figure it out for you, and I feel for you on that. But would 20 adults all simultaneously failing to understand you have been better? Or are you convinced enough of the other adults would have figured you out to have improved your happiness? I wouldn't count it; very few adults in my son's life understood him on their own. They usually needed me to explain him before the light bulb went off and they were able to meet his needs.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

28 May 2019, 12:34 am

Aspie1 wrote:
magz wrote:
How is "conventional family unit" equated to "excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake)"?
Those are two independent factors.
Because... Excessive expectations and arbitrary rules happen only in conventional families, both nuclear and extended. They don't happen in Mutual Adoption Clubs, because the child can just move in with another family. They don't happen in communal apartments, because the child can get around it by leveraging another family living there.

Now, I tried talking to my therapist about what my family was doing. She just mocked me by rubbing it in my face, rather than teach me to assert myself. This had to do with her job title: she was a family therapist. "Family" means "adults". So she was helping them, not me. I was just too naive to realize it, thinking "family" meant "everyone in the home".


This is just wrong. Excessive expectations and arbitrary rules are the norm in cult like communal living situations.

When you have someone on an ego trip, you will get excessive expectations and arbitrary rules. It won't get tampered by the living situation because manipulative people tend to be just as good at manipulating other adults as they are at manipulating children. All you end up with is a larger pool of people sucked into the vortex of excessive expectations and arbitrary rules.

You have the wrong demon.


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


auntblabby
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 Feb 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 114,571
Location: the island of defective toy santas

28 May 2019, 12:42 am

my folks respected my black sheep siblings a LOT more.



cubedemon6073
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Nov 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,958

28 May 2019, 12:55 am

DW_a_mom wrote:
Aspie1 wrote:
DW_a_mom wrote:
Do you ever actually read anything I write? It really seems like you did not in this thread. I spent a lot of time on thoughts you clearly failed to absorb in any form.

You start from incorrect assumptions about the majority of parents, and that makes all your speculation moot in my opinion. You presume to know us, but you do not, and you aren't exhibiting any willingness to listen. Its really frustrating.
Yes, I read your posts defending the conventional family unit. As much as I want to, I can't agree with any of them. It's far, far too easy to justify excessive expectations and arbitrary rules (like limiting water intake) as "caring", "knowing better", and "wanting the best for the child" :roll: :roll:. As expected, good kids get the brunt of it. Being left alone and free is what constitutes respect in my beliefs, and only bad kids usually get that. Hence, "respect more".

What's sadly ironic is that Russia, our Cold War nemesis that allegedly tampered with the 2016 elections and has a poor mental healthcare system, actually created an aspie-friendly environment for good kids to grow up in (those communal apartments, that is). Think about it: There were very few cases of childhood anxiety when such apartments were around. (As opposed to today in the US, where every family cocoons itself from the big, bad outside world, kids are gobbling up Prozac like M&Ms.) Granted, it was driven by Communist Party politics and housing shortages, rather than by concern for good kids. But the unintended result is astonishing, and will never happen in the US. (It was dismantled 30 years later, by a mass construction, so each family could have its own apartment.) Today, communal apartments continue to exist in Russian cities to a limited extent, but only among college students and poor elderly persons, not families with kids.


Very specifically, did you read my April 7th post on page 9?

Isolated family units are only a problem when you have bad parents.

Communal living would have been horrible for both my kids. Being around people has always increased the frequency of my son's meltdowns and anxiety. He is drawn to people, but it stresses him out. We figured that out by the time he was 4. Periods of high social exposure always had to be followed by alone time in one of his safe places. How would he get that in a crowded living situation?

Every child is different. It is the job of the parents to figure out what that means. Clearly, your parents did not figure it out for you, and I feel for you on that. But would 20 adults all simultaneously failing to understand you have been better? Or are you convinced enough of the other adults would have figured you out to have improved your happiness? I wouldn't count it; very few adults in my son's life understood him on their own. They usually needed me to explain him before the light bulb went off and they were able to meet his needs.


DW, I know what you mean about the communal living. It would've been horrible for me as well as a kid.

Aspie1, I don't know the full story as we don't have your parent's side of the story. But I will accept that your experiences are true. Here is what I see you as doing and I'm not an expert. I'm an autistic person myself so please forgive anything I'm ignorant about or anything I get wrong. Your taking your own experiences and applying them in a general way. This is a fallacy in logic called a hasty generalization.

Aspie1, Another thing, we are both autistic so this is difficult for both of us. You're looking at the mechanism of parenting itself (I tend to do this to in many areas as well so I understand) instead of the human component (i.e. bonds that parents share with children or at least good parents especially the mother's bond. A number of mothers have a special bond with their children. I don't understand it but I accept it is there and I've seen it. I don't know if I'm explaining well.)



Aspie1
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 7 Mar 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,749
Location: United States

28 May 2019, 6:44 am

DW_a_mom wrote:
Communal living would have been horrible for both my kids. Being around people has always increased the frequency of my son's meltdowns and anxiety. He is drawn to people, but it stresses him out. We figured that out by the time he was 4. Periods of high social exposure always had to be followed by alone time in one of his safe places. How would he get that in a crowded living situation?
I was very drawn to people too; trouble making friends didn't become an issue until I was 10. I loved it when my family had guests or went as guests to someone's home. More often than not, the other family had kids of their own, and I bonded with these kids quite well. So it meant that for at least one evening, I wasn't going to be lonely. In fact, I always nearly cried when they had to leave or when I had to go home again. Having another family live in my home as perpetual guests of sorts felt like paradise. It meant the fun of playing together never had to stop. Plus, non-family adults were nicer to me, even if they were on my parents' side in everything.

DW_a_mom wrote:
Every child is different. It is the job of the parents to figure out what that means. Clearly, your parents did not figure it out for you, and I feel for you on that. But would 20 adults all simultaneously failing to understand you have been better? Or are you convinced enough of the other adults would have figured you out to have improved your happiness? I wouldn't count it; very few adults in my son's life understood him on their own. They usually needed me to explain him before the light bulb went off and they were able to meet his needs.
It just might be better, I don't know. Outside of laughing at me when I said something intelligent, non-family adults were generally respectful to me, without me needing to be a bad kid. Perhaps I had that inquisitive "aspie" look on my face, which gave them cuteness overload. So basically, I could still coast on that even after I aged out of physical cuteness. And cuteness often gets you better treatment. Hey, today, I'm more likely to approach a woman who looks cute. ;)



DW_a_mom
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Feb 2008
Gender: Female
Posts: 13,689
Location: Northern California

28 May 2019, 1:28 pm

Aspie1 wrote:
And cuteness often gets you better treatment.


Now this, I feel, IS an accurate observation of how the world works.

Unfortunately for the world.

But, yes, human instinct favors attractiveness in its various forms, and cuteness is attractive.

Quite a few "bad" kids master cuteness as a survival technique. Maybe that is the actual difference?


_________________
Mom to an amazing young adult AS son, plus an also amazing non-AS daughter. Most likely part of the "Broader Autism Phenotype" (some traits).


BenderRodriguez
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,343

28 May 2019, 1:58 pm

I grew up in the system, communal living was a nightmare for me, leaving aside everything else. It literally took me decades to get used to sharing a bed and a living space with someone again. My son is the same, even as a toddler he hated someone else sleeping in his room and his worst meltdowns were triggered by having a lot of people around opposed to choosing when and with whom he interacts.

It's easy to idealise the other side of the coin, but the truth is you know nothing about what it's like to live in the conditions you described.

You seem to think all families are like yours and this is just not true. There are a lot of abusive parents out there, it's more common than people like to admit, and your parents definitely deserve a "you won't believe this" spot in there.


_________________
"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored." Aldous Huxley