Vaccination plunge

Post Reply New Topic

What? A PhD doesn't make you a corporate shill. If someone doesn't have a PhD they probably do NOT have the proper knowledge, resources, or position to research anything. A PhD is pretty much a pre-requisite for doing any kind of meaningful research on anything.

Having a PhD has nothing to do with anything else you said, I'm honestly not sure why you quoted that?

Guess what, DD's first tooth came through somewhere around 3-4 months too. She lost her first milk tooth by the time she was 4. She got polio and diptheria jabs but never went with MMR and was diagnosed when she was 9 with HFA.


For as weird as this may sound though, early tooth development might be an indicator of having AS neurology ?
Is early tooth eruption common in AS children?

I wish there was a study on that somewhere...

Our words, voice, and opinions are our birth right and are protected. Free speech is not a luxury and it is certainly not handed down to us from a government. In Australia, and ramping up quickly in the United States, it seems some speech is more free than others. A press release on January 27th from long time expert and vaccine educator Dr. Sherri Tenpenny announced that she has cancelled speaking appearances scheduled for Brisbane, Sydney, Adelaide, Melbourne, and Gold Coast. The reason was due to pro-vaccine extremists calling for violence and making bomb threats against venue owners and their families in some cities originally scheduled for the healthy living seminars.

Fellow vaccine lecturer Stephanie Messenger, who jointly decided to cancel her appearances along with Dr. Tenpenny, states that:

"We have reached a point where we can no longer guarantee the safety of those attending the seminar. Some people were planning to bring babies. The threats have been persistent. We are not able to insure that the attendees would be safe from harm."

Unfortunately, the ones making these threats are still at large....

NATURALSOCIETY.COM: "Doctor Educating Public on Vaccines Receives Bomb Threats, Cancels Tour" (January 29, 2015)
http://www.naturalsociety.com/dr-sherri ... mb-threats

New Canadian research published this week has found this season's flu shot is less effective than previously thought and in some cases may actually increase a person's risk of becoming ill.

"Unfortunately this year the vaccine hasn’t worked at all," says study co-author Dr. Jim Dickinson of the University of Calgary. "The reason for that is we have a version of the H3N2 virus that has moved away from the vaccine strain we're using.”

The research published in the journal, Eurosurveillance also found the flu shot's effectiveness diminishes if people received the vaccine 2 years in a row....

GLOBALNEWS.CA: "Influenza Outbreak in a Vaccinated Population — USS Ardent, February 2014" (October 24, 2014)
http://www.globalnews.ca/news/1804162/c ... tting-sick

...Vaccination is a barbarous practice, and it is one of the most fatal of all the delusions current in our time, not to be found even among the so-called savage races of the world. Its supporters are not content with its adoption by those who have no objection to it, but seek to impose it with the aid of penal laws and rigorous punishments on all people alike. The practice of vaccination is not very old, dating as it does only from 1798 A.D. But, during this comparatively short period that has elapsed, millions have fallen a prey to the delusion that those who get themselves vaccinated are safe from the attack of small-pox. No one can say that small-pox will necessarily attack those who have not been vaccinated; for many cases have been observed of unvaccinated people being free from its attack. From the fact that some people who are not vaccinated do get the disease, we cannot, of course, conclude that they would have been immune if only they had got themselves vaccinated....

GreenMedInfo.com: "Gandhi's Anti-Vaccine Views Ring True A Century Later" (February 1, 2015)
http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/gandhi ... ury-laterA

Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?

A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.

Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.

A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.

Q: Why?

A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.

Q: And then?

A: I did my own investigation.

Q: What conclusions did you come to?

A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.

Q: What conditions?

A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.

Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?

A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.

Q: Why?

A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.

Q: And beyond the purity issue?

A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."

Q: The immune system is?

A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.

Q: So the level of general health is important.

A: More than important. Vital.

Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?

A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.

Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?

A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.

Q: And in the industrialized nations?

A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.

Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.

A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.

Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.

A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.

Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.

A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.

...Andrew Wakefield manipulated data to discredite MMR vaccines in order to replace them with his own vaccine and make money with it. Not a hero if you ask me....

A doctor has won his high court battle against being struck off over the MMR jab controversy. Prof John Walker-Smith appealed against the General Medical Council's determination that he was guilty of serious professional misconduct. He was supported by parents of some of the children with autism and bowel disease treated by him at the Royal Free hospital, north London, until his retirement in 2001. On Wednesday Mr Justice Mitting, sitting at the high court in London, ruled that the GMC decision "cannot stand". He quashed the 2010 finding of professional misconduct and the striking off. Calling for changes in the way GMC fitness to practise panel hearings are conducted , the judge said of the flawed handling of Walker-Smith's case: "It would be a misfortune if this were to happen again...."

TheGuardian.com: "MMR row: high court rules doctor should not have been struck off" (March 7, 2012)
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2012 ... tor-appeal

...I knew "Mahatma" Gandhi was a crackpot, but that book on health is just pure crazy.

Well, when a tyrannical government forces almost everything about one's daily life, is it surprising and understandable when its citizens begin to doubt everything that the government does and says?

A recently published study has found an association between widespread exposure to fluoridated water and increased Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) prevalence among U.S. children.

The study comes from the Department of Psychology at Toronto’s York University and was published in the Environmental Health journal. The researchers studied data on ADHD among children age four to seventeen collected in 2003, 2007 and 2011 as part of the National Survey of Children’s Health, as well as state water fluoridation data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) collected between 1992 and 2008 . It is the first study to analyze the relationship between exposure to fluoridated water and ADHD prevalence....

BenSwann.com: "New Study Draws Connections Between Water Fluoridation and ADHD in Children" (March 5, 2015)
http://www.benswann.com/new-study-draws ... n-children

I thought about it a lot and realised that 4 other things coincided with my son's regression:
1. His first tooth came in.
2. He had his first taste of ice cream.
3. He got a little bit of sunburn on his arm for the first time.
4. He slept with a pillow for the first time

Albuquerque Journal, 3/20 reports:

2.3% of kids in Los Alamos public schools don’t get vaccinated. Their parents have received exemptions.

That’s the highest rate of non-vaccination in the state.

We’re talking about parents who work at the US Los Alamos Labs.

People with advanced degrees in science.

People who work for the federal government....

JonRappoport.wordpress.com: "Top gov’t. scientists say no to vaccines for their kids" (March 26, 2015)
https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015 ... their-kids