District only allows parents a week to review and sign IEP !

Page 1 of 1 [ 11 posts ] 

HisMom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,271

05 Mar 2015, 10:11 pm

This is in California and I posted about this before. The district did a psychological assessment and resource assessment on a 5th grader HFA child and came back claiming there was no further need to have the child on an IEP. The IEP was held last Tuesday and the school SLP has been relentlessly harassing the parents to sign the IEP claiming that their special education department only allows parents about a week to review and sign the IEP.

This IEP removes the student from an IEP and places him on a 504 instead. Parents want more time in order to seek a second opinion / independent evaluation. They also asked the school what in the Ed Code requires a parent to sign on an IEP so fast and the response was that this was their special education department policy / rule and that Mom needs to go in on Monday and sign off on this !

How can we fight this ? What can they do if Mom refuses to do so ? Please, please, please help !


_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".

-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116


SC_2010
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 372

05 Mar 2015, 10:55 pm

For an understandable overview of problem solving IEP issues, start on page 42 of this pdf: http://www.specialed.us/pl-07/SpEd_in_P ... age-07.pdf

The IDEA allows parents extra time, if needed, to fully evaluate the IEP. So I wouldn't worry about their time line. 115.78(3)(d)

The parents have a right to request an independent evaluation. More about that process here: https://www.drnpa.org/wp-content/upload ... uation.pdf

Because it is considered a change of placement, the parents have the right to due process if they disagree with the change. The parents can first try to resolve this through mediation & getting the independent evals. If they can't come to an agreement, they can file for due process - which ensures their child stays in their current placement (this is the "stay put" rule) until their is a judgement on their case. Here is more information about that process: http://www.specialed.us/Parents/Rights/ ... _06due.htm


The mom does NOT have to give consent to the placement change. Read that first link to see what her rights are and how to figure this out.



HisMom
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 27 Aug 2012
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,271

05 Mar 2015, 11:33 pm

SC_2010 wrote:
For an understandable overview of problem solving IEP issues, start on page 42 of this pdf: http://www.specialed.us/pl-07/SpEd_in_P ... age-07.pdf

The IDEA allows parents extra time, if needed, to fully evaluate the IEP. So I wouldn't worry about their time line. 115.78(3)(d)

The parents have a right to request an independent evaluation. More about that process here: https://www.drnpa.org/wp-content/upload ... uation.pdf

Because it is considered a change of placement, the parents have the right to due process if they disagree with the change. The parents can first try to resolve this through mediation & getting the independent evals. If they can't come to an agreement, they can file for due process - which ensures their child stays in their current placement (this is the "stay put" rule) until their is a judgement on their case. Here is more information about that process: http://www.specialed.us/Parents/Rights/ ... _06due.htm


The mom does NOT have to give consent to the placement change. Read that first link to see what her rights are and how to figure this out.


Thank you so much for your response !

I noticed that the articles repeatedly refer to Wisconsin. Would the above mentioned timeline under 115.78(3)(d) also hold true for a student residing in California ?

Would you clarify, please ?


_________________
O villain, villain, smiling, damnèd villain!
My tables—meet it is I set it down
That one may smile, and smile, and be a villain.
At least I'm sure it may be so in "Denmark".

-- Hamlet, 1.5.113-116


SC_2010
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 372

06 Mar 2015, 2:03 am

Those were just good resources that clearly explained the law. The IDEA is a national law, so they are applicable for all states. Some states have additional state laws about special education, but they can't change the basics of the actual IDEA.



SC_2010
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 17 Apr 2010
Age: 39
Gender: Female
Posts: 372

06 Mar 2015, 2:05 am

Here are the California-specific due process procedures: http://www.disabilityrightsca.org/pubs/504001Ch06.pdf



zette
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,183
Location: California

06 Mar 2015, 8:03 pm

As a general bit of advice, any time someone states a "rule" like this, ask them to please show you where in this procedure is documented in state law or local policy handbook. They may back down, or provide you with evidence that will not be to their favor in due process.



InThisTogether
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jul 2012
Age: 56
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,709
Location: USA

06 Mar 2015, 8:12 pm

zette wrote:
As a general bit of advice, any time someone states a "rule" like this, ask them to please show you where in this procedure is documented in state law or local policy handbook. They may back down, or provide you with evidence that will not be to their favor in due process.


^^This. But I would definitely at this point say "appeal" or "due process" just so they can't pull some monkey business and stop services claiming she did not sign in time.

I swear if I ever win the lottery, a big portion of my money is going to go toward hiring the most bad-ass legal team around that I can just send to parents in need free of charge. I feel so furious with schools who try to use deception, trickery, and pressure to cheat kids out of services they have a legal entitlement to (and need).


_________________
Mom to 2 exceptional atypical kids
Long BAP lineage


Waterfalls
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Jun 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,075

06 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm

Wrightslaw.com is full of good information.

What are your and moms primary concerns about the child's current needs?



zette
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jul 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,183
Location: California

06 Mar 2015, 9:24 pm

There should also be a line on the IEP where the mom can check "I do not consent", which will force the school to provide prior written notice and start due process.



ASDMommyASDKid
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Oct 2011
Gender: Female
Posts: 3,666

06 Mar 2015, 10:22 pm

zette wrote:
There should also be a line on the IEP where the mom can check "I do not consent", which will force the school to provide prior written notice and start due process.


Yes. This^^^^

I don't see how there can be a time limit for a "no." I wish i had my old handbook handy, but I believe if a plan is not agreed upon, the school has options about what to do, and then the parent has choices in how to appeal if they do not like what the school does. This is where your independent evals and such would come into play, I believe.



KariLynn
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 27 Aug 2013
Gender: Female
Posts: 163

08 Mar 2015, 8:29 am

The parent simply needs to provide in writing their concerns, and inform the team of their course of action and expected time frame, and refuse to sign until they are content with the IEP. This is protected by federal law.


_________________
www.4MyLearn.org
A COMMUNITY FOR ALL PEOPLE INTERESTED IN PEOPLE ACHIEVING THEIR POTENTIAL