Page 1 of 1 [ 5 posts ] 

sonshinesmom
Emu Egg
Emu Egg

User avatar

Joined: 1 Apr 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 3

02 Apr 2007, 2:47 pm

Isn't it "ironic" that they removed the kids being bullied and not the bullies.
Just a litlle food for thought!
I fought for my sonshine to be homeschooled...finally after being put in a program that he was succeeding in...they decide oh ya he can be homeschooled...after fighting for him to do it for years...and then we go through the court system for truancy only to have it dismissed...and then when I didn't want to homeschool all of a sudden it's okay...we had transportation issues etc...a nightmare I wouldn't want anyone else to go through
~sonshinesmom~



ster
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2005
Gender: Female
Posts: 2,485
Location: new england

02 Apr 2007, 5:07 pm

it is ironic, isn't it ?



EarthCalling
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 27 Mar 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 817
Location: Ontario, Canada

02 Apr 2007, 7:41 pm

That sounds very ironic.

Ontario isn't like that. All a parent has to do is sign a sheet saying " I intend to provide an adiquate education for my child". Indeed, they don't even "have" to do that. It is more of a guideline then a rule...

so whatcha gonna do?



violet_yoshi
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Aug 2004
Age: 42
Gender: Female
Posts: 1,297

03 Apr 2007, 12:03 am

Easier to remove the bullied, than deal with the parents of the bullies. Who most likely are bullies themselves.


_________________
"Sprinkle, sprinkle, little bar, what I wonder is a cat" - Cheese from Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends


Motomome
Butterfly
Butterfly

User avatar

Joined: 9 Feb 2007
Gender: Female
Posts: 9

03 Apr 2007, 5:58 pm

It is not only ironic but also very sad.



cron