Page 2 of 2 [ 18 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

Dellingr
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 26 Oct 2009
Age: 35
Gender: Male
Posts: 152
Location: Wellington, New Zealand

27 Jul 2010, 11:12 pm

Yeah, halo 3's campaign is pretty short, but I'd argue you can't actually consider halos 2 and 3 as separate games when evaluating their single player campaigns, they're parts 1 and 2 of one large story concluding the current conflict

that in mind, I really like the 2-3 campaign, though the first game obviously has the most complete story on its own

that said, I'm very irritated with this shift of emphasis to multiplayer, by all means have multiplayer, have the best multiplayer you can make-up to the point where your singleplayer team is underresourced, that's when you've gone too far with it

I think Reach will get the best of both, though, given that it's the last halo game they're making and they've talked in vidocs about how they want it to be the best one and how they want to go out with a bang


_________________
We do not experience fear, but we understand how it affects you-Legion


AntDog
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Aug 2010
Age: 31
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,967
Location: Riding on a Dragon

26 Aug 2010, 9:32 pm

CE was amazing lots of enimies many explosions 8O

2 kinda has a ok game finished explore mountains now feel :?

3 Great graphics elites are finally useful allys and making levels :D

Wars Addicting set up defences build forces then launch attack and gain bases then conquer 8)

ODST a let down that got me bored after just one day I think its because the elites arent enimies and mostly because theres was none of the flood :twisted:

Reach seems to be better than ODST but still no flood :evil:

Hope a seventh game is made because there so many seven references in the series