Page 3 of 6 [ 86 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

31 Jul 2016, 7:13 pm

Misery wrote:
On the downside, I'm really sore now. Everything hurts. WAY too much of the walking.

you're not alone

http://gizmodo.com/sore-legs-become-pan ... 1783402931

:lol:


_________________
404


Midnightstar16
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 13 Apr 2016
Age: 22
Gender: Female
Posts: 4,204
Location: Vaniville Town, Kalos Region

31 Jul 2016, 8:02 pm

The game is perfect in every way possible! Out of all the Pokemon I have, these are the ones I'm getting attached to:

Image

Image

Image


_________________
☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪
Uhhh what do I put here now?
☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪☆♪


ArielsSong
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Mar 2016
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 673
Location: Lancashire, UK

01 Aug 2016, 1:18 am

Midnightstar16 wrote:
The game is perfect in every way possible! Out of all the Pokemon I have, these are the ones I'm getting attached to:

Image

Image

Image


I like this.

I'm working on collecting rather than battling, but I do have my party of six. It is possible that it will change as I catch more Pokemon, but for now they are:

- Charmander (my absolute favourite Pokemon is Charmeleon, so I am working on evolving him - four Charmander catches to go!)

- Pikachu

- Kingler (my daughter's first catch)

- Flareon (my most powerful Pokemon by far)

- Nidoran male (this little guy may be switched out, as I'm not overly attached to him)

- Ponyta



Earthbound
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Feb 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 756
Location: USA

01 Aug 2016, 1:39 am

I honestly see Pokemon Go being a game that lasts for a few years then stops. It doesn't have staying power in my view. It lacks so much depth compared to the regular Pokemon RPGs that have been on Gameboy and DS handhelds over the years.

I think what bugs me a bit is it's yet another "free to play with in-app purchases" game. That's the worst type of business model for gaming in my view. So many gamers get hooked into the free part of the game, then they don't mind spending a $1 here and there (and then it ends up being a ton). I realize it's their game and they can do what they want, but it's a horrible gaming model that needs to go. It literally preys on the impatient people and the people that easily get addicted to games. It works so often for mobile gaming- because people are on the go for travel a lot, so they want to get in as much game time as they can. Waiting for something to happen in the game isnt fun for them, so they pay a price to speed it up, then do it again and again. Sometimes the in-app stuff isnt for speed up times, its for useless things that don't add much to the game either.

So yeah.. I honestly would find some use for Pokemon Go if it didn't have that crap thrown on it. But even then- it's a dumbed down Pokemon game for mobile gamers. Heck.. I havent played a regular Pokemon in a while, so thats another reason I don't have much interest in Pokemon Go. The series is super easy (in general) and has added so many boring looking Pokemon over the years. The game makers don't do major changes often because the fanbase doesn't want that apparently.

/End rant (for now at least).



ArielsSong
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 4 Mar 2016
Age: 37
Gender: Female
Posts: 673
Location: Lancashire, UK

01 Aug 2016, 1:46 am

Earthbound wrote:
I honestly see Pokemon Go being a game that lasts for a few years then stops. It doesn't have staying power in my view. It lacks so much depth compared to the regular Pokemon RPGs that have been on Gameboy and DS handhelds over the years.

I think what bugs me a bit is it's yet another "free to play with in-app purchases" game. That's the worst type of business model for gaming in my view. So many gamers get hooked into the free part of the game, then they don't mind spending a $1 here and there (and then it ends up being a ton). I realize it's their game and they can do what they want, but it's a horrible gaming model that needs to go. It literally preys on the impatient people and the people that easily get addicted to games. It works so often for mobile gaming- because people are on the go for travel a lot, so they want to get in as much game time as they can. Waiting for something to happen in the game isnt fun for them, so they pay a price to speed it up, then do it again and again. Sometimes the in-app stuff isnt for speed up times, its for useless things that don't add much to the game either.

So yeah.. I honestly would find some use for Pokemon Go if it didn't have that crap thrown on it. But even then- it's a dumbed down Pokemon game for mobile gamers. Heck.. I havent played a regular Pokemon in a while, so thats another reason I don't have much interest in Pokemon Go. The series is super easy (in general) and has added so many boring looking Pokemon over the years. The game makers don't do major changes often because the fanbase doesn't want that apparently.

/End rant (for now at least).


A valid point.

I am usually very against freemium games and refuse to play them on principle, but I thought long and hard about the Pokemon Go model and to me, it's freemium done right.

There are many freemium games in which you are blocked from advancing until you wait for a certain amount of time, or pay to avoid the wait. Those, I hugely dislike. I ensure that they do not receive any of my money.

Pokemon Go, I think, has hit the right balance. You can pay for items, but if you don't want to pay then there is no essential wait time. All you have to do is get up, go for a short walk and find a Pokestop.

I think too many games disguise themselves as free when it is entirely unrealistic to play without spending money, but with Pokemon Go the spending is not essential but more a luxury - the way it should be.

I also haven't played any other Pokemon game in quite a few years. I got tired of the same game released over and over again with a very slight change but essentially identical gameplay/storyline. I am really enjoying finally seeing something that is a bit 'different'.



anagram
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,433
Location: 4 Nov 2012

01 Aug 2016, 1:55 am

pokemon go is an experiment. it seems to be doing fine at it so far

the real games of this new genre are yet to come


_________________
404


Earthbound
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 20 Feb 2016
Gender: Male
Posts: 756
Location: USA

01 Aug 2016, 2:03 am

I also think the privacy with the game isn't right. I want to say the game makers are working on it, or there's been a patch? A game that tracks what you do with GPS doesn't seem right.

Also one other thing that concerns me- all the people trespassing to get Pokemon. There is NO good excuse for them doing this. I read that a future update for the game will allow businesses to opt-out of the game probably. That doesn't excuse what people have done though. I think it's a lawsuit just waiting to happen. Very frustrating that people would stoop as low as to trespass on properties (cemetaries- like Arlington as a big example and other places) just to play the game. I'm sure it wasnt just kids doing it either. Is there no respect left with people?



magnum233
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 247
Location: New Zealand

01 Aug 2016, 12:26 pm

I hate the stupid thing lol, sorry if anyone dislikes me saying this.

Its the most gimmicky pointless thing ever just another fad. Were better than this guys you know that, put your attention to games that require true skill.


_________________
Im like over there, somewhere.....


Dox47
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jan 2008
Gender: Male
Posts: 13,577
Location: Seattle-ish

01 Aug 2016, 12:46 pm

Judging by my Facebook wall, the people most obsessed with this game are the ones who hate it (most of whom have never played it).


_________________
Your boos mean nothing, I've seen what makes you cheer.

- Rick Sanchez


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

01 Aug 2016, 12:47 pm

Earthbound wrote:
I honestly see Pokemon Go being a game that lasts for a few years then stops. It doesn't have staying power in my view. It lacks so much depth compared to the regular Pokemon RPGs that have been on Gameboy and DS handhelds over the years.

I think what bugs me a bit is it's yet another "free to play with in-app purchases" game. That's the worst type of business model for gaming in my view. So many gamers get hooked into the free part of the game, then they don't mind spending a $1 here and there (and then it ends up being a ton). I realize it's their game and they can do what they want, but it's a horrible gaming model that needs to go. It literally preys on the impatient people and the people that easily get addicted to games. It works so often for mobile gaming- because people are on the go for travel a lot, so they want to get in as much game time as they can. Waiting for something to happen in the game isnt fun for them, so they pay a price to speed it up, then do it again and again. Sometimes the in-app stuff isnt for speed up times, its for useless things that don't add much to the game either.

So yeah.. I honestly would find some use for Pokemon Go if it didn't have that crap thrown on it. But even then- it's a dumbed down Pokemon game for mobile gamers. Heck.. I havent played a regular Pokemon in a while, so thats another reason I don't have much interest in Pokemon Go. The series is super easy (in general) and has added so many boring looking Pokemon over the years. The game makers don't do major changes often because the fanbase doesn't want that apparently.

/End rant (for now at least).


What do you mean the free part of the game, the whole game is free...I imagine having the option for impatient people who don't want to just wait to earn stuff in the game to buy stuff helps them make profit to keep the over-all game free. Otherwise they'd probably charge to play the game at all which would kind of suck.

Also its one of the first Augmented reality games of it's kind, I don't think it's meant to be a copy of console pokemon games so I don't get why people complain that it's different than those games....it's supposed to be.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

01 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm

Earthbound wrote:
I also think the privacy with the game isn't right. I want to say the game makers are working on it, or there's been a patch? A game that tracks what you do with GPS doesn't seem right.

Also one other thing that concerns me- all the people trespassing to get Pokemon. There is NO good excuse for them doing this. I read that a future update for the game will allow businesses to opt-out of the game probably. That doesn't excuse what people have done though. I think it's a lawsuit just waiting to happen. Very frustrating that people would stoop as low as to trespass on properties (cemetaries- like Arlington as a big example and other places) just to play the game. I'm sure it wasnt just kids doing it either. Is there no respect left with people?


Well obviously people shouldn't use the game as an excuse for trespassing, I think it's a given if the pokemon is inside someones house or private property you move on to the next one and count it as a loss, even if it was that pikachu or whatever you've been dying to find. Me, my boyfriend and everyone in my house play and we all know that...so I don't think the game should be blamed.

Also the whole idea of the game is to find pokemon in the real world...in order to do that the GPS has to track you for the game to know where you are and what is nearby you.


_________________
We won't go back.


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

01 Aug 2016, 1:13 pm

magnum233 wrote:
I hate the stupid thing lol, sorry if anyone dislikes me saying this.

Its the most gimmicky pointless thing ever just another fad. Were better than this guys you know that, put your attention to games that require true skill.


Why does it matter to you if other people play it or not? I mean better than what? walking around and having fun catching little pokemon(I was never even into pokemon and I think its a great idea of a game). I still play League of Legends which is probably more along the lines of a game that requires true skill...but I see no reason why I shouldn't enjoy simpler games to.


_________________
We won't go back.


magnum233
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 247
Location: New Zealand

01 Aug 2016, 1:14 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
Also its one of the first Augmented reality games of it's kind, I don't think it's meant to be a copy of console pokemon games so I don't get why people complain that it's different than those games....it's supposed to be.


I'll show you augmented reality games :p



VR as it was intended in the 80's enjoy.

Edit, there is actually true augmented reality games around.. Feel like trying to solve one? Ok not quite the same but really cool

https://www.reddit.com/r/ARG/

The best i know of was the Soma ARG until the creators took it offline.


_________________
Im like over there, somewhere.....


Last edited by magnum233 on 01 Aug 2016, 1:22 pm, edited 2 times in total.

magnum233
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 247
Location: New Zealand

01 Aug 2016, 1:17 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
magnum233 wrote:
I hate the stupid thing lol, sorry if anyone dislikes me saying this.

Its the most gimmicky pointless thing ever just another fad. Were better than this guys you know that, put your attention to games that require true skill.


Why does it matter to you if other people play it or not? I mean better than what? walking around and having fun catching little pokemon(I was never even into pokemon and I think its a great idea of a game). I still play League of Legends which is probably more along the lines of a game that requires true skill...but I see no reason why I shouldn't enjoy simpler games to.


Sure people can play whatever i just have issues with things that require no brain or intelligence. And yes i know about league of legend teaming and skill, a friend of mine got tired of his team not training or cooperating hes semi pro. I personally dont get into moba's but yes theres some good ones. I prefer more 'immersive' experiences.

I did used to play dota 1 back on wc3 those were the days hehe.


_________________
Im like over there, somewhere.....


Sweetleaf
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Jan 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Female
Posts: 34,907
Location: Somewhere in Colorado

01 Aug 2016, 1:24 pm

magnum233 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
magnum233 wrote:
I hate the stupid thing lol, sorry if anyone dislikes me saying this.

Its the most gimmicky pointless thing ever just another fad. Were better than this guys you know that, put your attention to games that require true skill.


Why does it matter to you if other people play it or not? I mean better than what? walking around and having fun catching little pokemon(I was never even into pokemon and I think its a great idea of a game). I still play League of Legends which is probably more along the lines of a game that requires true skill...but I see no reason why I shouldn't enjoy simpler games to.


Sure people can play whatever i just have issues with things that require no brain or intelligence. And yes i know about league of legend teaming and skill, a friend of mine got tired of his team not training or cooperating hes semi pro. I personally dont get into moba's but yes theres some good ones. I prefer more 'immersive' experiences.


That does make sense, I suppose the way I see it if it wasn't for the walking around to catch Pokemon I probably wouldn't play it as the combat certainly isn't anything spectacular. I generally don't like mobile games due to that, as phone screens simply don't allow for very skillful combat or anything.


_________________
We won't go back.


magnum233
Sea Gull
Sea Gull

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jun 2015
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 247
Location: New Zealand

01 Aug 2016, 1:31 pm

Sweetleaf wrote:
magnum233 wrote:
Sweetleaf wrote:
magnum233 wrote:
I hate the stupid thing lol, sorry if anyone dislikes me saying this.

Its the most gimmicky pointless thing ever just another fad. Were better than this guys you know that, put your attention to games that require true skill.


Why does it matter to you if other people play it or not? I mean better than what? walking around and having fun catching little pokemon(I was never even into pokemon and I think its a great idea of a game). I still play League of Legends which is probably more along the lines of a game that requires true skill...but I see no reason why I shouldn't enjoy simpler games to.


Sure people can play whatever i just have issues with things that require no brain or intelligence. And yes i know about league of legend teaming and skill, a friend of mine got tired of his team not training or cooperating hes semi pro. I personally dont get into moba's but yes theres some good ones. I prefer more 'immersive' experiences.


That does make sense, I suppose the way I see it if it wasn't for the walking around to catch Pokemon I probably wouldn't play it as the combat certainly isn't anything spectacular. I generally don't like mobile games due to that, as phone screens simply don't allow for very skillful combat or anything.


Eventually mobile devices will likely be powerful enough to run VR headsets and maybe more if it becomes home consumer. Then you will be able to have truly immersive augmented reality games, likely very dangerous though if intended to be used outdoors. I could imagine padded rooms lol.

Check this out https://thevoid.com/ the worlds first VR theme park, they have the full suit everything. Its pretty much what VR is supposed to be.


_________________
Im like over there, somewhere.....