ToadOfSteel wrote:
I *hate* FPS games... there's very little strategy involved (except for CTF games, and that is usually just form a blob around the flag carrier)... The only FPS games I have ever played for any substantial period of time are Star Wars Jedi Academy and Counter-strike (the latter only for like a week)... In addition, the multiplayer modes often attract the lowest denominator of gamers, which include the common 12 year old boy, which completely ruins the enjoyability any of these games might have had...
Unlike most of the other people in this thread, I'm a big fan of RTS... The ability to give orders to multiple units opens up a whole field of possibilities... Yes, I've played bad RTS's before, don't get me wrong (I'm looking at you, Rise&Fall)... but even some of the mediocre games still allow for some general strategizing... Star Wars: Empire At War, for all its bugginess, and LOTR: Battle for Middle Earth 2, have what I think is one of the best gameplay systems for an RTS: a hybrid between a "global" turn-based map played in the style of a game of Risk, and individual battlefields that you bring units built in global mode into to do the actual combat, which allows you to control the overall strategy and the more indepth tactical modes at the same time...
When it comes to RPG's it's a mixed bag. I'm not as much a fan of Japanese games (although some good ones like FF8 and FF10 show up), but pretty much anything by Bioware is automatically golden (the only thing I don't like about the company is that they release 6 months earlier on the shitbox 360 than on PC, but I get the feeling that was something forced on them by microsoft, so I don't blame them for it)... Bethesda is also good (I wasted over 1000 game hours on Morrowind, and lesser amounts on Oblivion and Fallout 3, but overall the games they do are well done)...
LOL the sh**box 360 xD
PC is the only way to go.