Page 3 of 3 [ 48 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

phil777
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 May 2008
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,825
Location: Montreal, Québec

28 Apr 2009, 1:31 pm

I will agree that some of the old games are still golden despite their age... Once in a while they do nice things with 3D though.



Rainbow-Squirrel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Dec 2006
Age: 44
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,093
Location: Siena, Italy

29 Apr 2009, 5:39 pm

I'm ambivalent with j-rpgs. I love them for the carachters, general atmosphere, storyline but I "hate" them when it comes to having to go through menus to set your team. I mean, I like videogames because they give me immediate action, I don't wanna have to overthink. The thing I really hate anyway is the randomness of certain fights, where you have no real control on the outcome, you may spend time and energy to set it the best you can just to see it fail, that can get really frustrating (I'm currently stuck on both The Last Remnant and Lost Odyssey).



ScottF
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 2 Sep 2008
Age: 46
Gender: Male
Posts: 815

30 Apr 2009, 4:40 pm

Keith wrote:
The only third person shooter I like is the 3D GTA series. I can't stand RPG or other games like that, including The Sims, etc.



City of Heroes and Fallout 3 are the only ones I really like


_________________
One day you dumb, brainy smarties will look upon us and beg for mercy...and we will consider it. -Peter Griffin


ViperaAspis
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Apr 2009
Age: 56
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,083
Location: Portland, OR

30 Apr 2009, 10:04 pm

kalantir wrote:
I'll partially agree with this. Many platformers are made more difficult then they need to be because of things such as bad camera angles, bad controls, poor level design, etc... But I think if they want to make it difficult without including any of those things, that's fine by me. I like a challenge(something I rarely find in videogames. Especially nowadays).


You might like one called Mirror's Edge. I find it to be a challenging platformer, but that may be because my reflexes are getting a little old now :)



Homer_Bob
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Jan 2009
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,562
Location: New England

30 Apr 2009, 10:20 pm

I'll have to admit, I really don't like first person shooters. I'm just not good at them, I never have been. I like my action to be third person, I find shooting in 3rd person to be a lot more enjoyable.



ProfessorX
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,795

05 May 2009, 12:32 pm

Lost_Soul, I'm not too fond of FPS games but, then again that's cause the last time I played Call Of Duty, it tended to be everyone for themselves not, were everyone worked as a team to win the game and all..I actually like some sports games like NBA Live 2008 and beyond cause, going around fouling someone can really get on someone's nerves. Mind you though, that is not the only tactic which is used in my arsenal though.. 2nd, I've considered playing games like Godzilla: Unleashed but, I don't have any console gaming system at this moment.Well, that does it for me on this..


ProfessorX



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

05 May 2009, 3:29 pm

I *hate* FPS games... there's very little strategy involved (except for CTF games, and that is usually just form a blob around the flag carrier)... The only FPS games I have ever played for any substantial period of time are Star Wars Jedi Academy and Counter-strike (the latter only for like a week)... In addition, the multiplayer modes often attract the lowest denominator of gamers, which include the common 12 year old boy, which completely ruins the enjoyability any of these games might have had...

Unlike most of the other people in this thread, I'm a big fan of RTS... The ability to give orders to multiple units opens up a whole field of possibilities... Yes, I've played bad RTS's before, don't get me wrong (I'm looking at you, Rise&Fall)... but even some of the mediocre games still allow for some general strategizing... Star Wars: Empire At War, for all its bugginess, and LOTR: Battle for Middle Earth 2, have what I think is one of the best gameplay systems for an RTS: a hybrid between a "global" turn-based map played in the style of a game of Risk, and individual battlefields that you bring units built in global mode into to do the actual combat, which allows you to control the overall strategy and the more indepth tactical modes at the same time...

When it comes to RPG's it's a mixed bag. I'm not as much a fan of Japanese games (although some good ones like FF8 and FF10 show up), but pretty much anything by Bioware is automatically golden (the only thing I don't like about the company is that they release 6 months earlier on the shitbox 360 than on PC, but I get the feeling that was something forced on them by microsoft, so I don't blame them for it)... Bethesda is also good (I wasted over 1000 game hours on Morrowind, and lesser amounts on Oblivion and Fallout 3, but overall the games they do are well done)...



samtoo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 12 May 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,762
Location: England

05 May 2009, 4:20 pm

Can't think of anything at the moment, but I'm sure many here among us know what I'm talking about when I say that I find games infuriating where there are only a few save points and they're few and far between, and when you die at a really difficult point you have to play the game again back at some distant save point. :roll:


_________________
Thousands of candles can be lit from a single candle,
and the life of the candle will not be shortened.
Happiness never decreases by being shared.


mlqqeae
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

06 May 2009, 5:13 am

99% of console games
The Halo Series
The Call of Duty Series
World of Warcraft is top on the list

On the other hand love games like these:
VALVe and Source Mods
Total War Series
ICO (Ico and Shadow of the Colossus)
Legend of Zelda
Pikmin
NCSoft's Guild Wars
Assassin's Creed was good but short and not so replayable
World of Goo was a good one.
Love nDoors. Only good free mmo creator I have on my list.
The Burnout Series



mlqqeae
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 3 May 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 52

06 May 2009, 5:14 am

ToadOfSteel wrote:
I *hate* FPS games... there's very little strategy involved (except for CTF games, and that is usually just form a blob around the flag carrier)... The only FPS games I have ever played for any substantial period of time are Star Wars Jedi Academy and Counter-strike (the latter only for like a week)... In addition, the multiplayer modes often attract the lowest denominator of gamers, which include the common 12 year old boy, which completely ruins the enjoyability any of these games might have had...

Unlike most of the other people in this thread, I'm a big fan of RTS... The ability to give orders to multiple units opens up a whole field of possibilities... Yes, I've played bad RTS's before, don't get me wrong (I'm looking at you, Rise&Fall)... but even some of the mediocre games still allow for some general strategizing... Star Wars: Empire At War, for all its bugginess, and LOTR: Battle for Middle Earth 2, have what I think is one of the best gameplay systems for an RTS: a hybrid between a "global" turn-based map played in the style of a game of Risk, and individual battlefields that you bring units built in global mode into to do the actual combat, which allows you to control the overall strategy and the more indepth tactical modes at the same time...

When it comes to RPG's it's a mixed bag. I'm not as much a fan of Japanese games (although some good ones like FF8 and FF10 show up), but pretty much anything by Bioware is automatically golden (the only thing I don't like about the company is that they release 6 months earlier on the shitbox 360 than on PC, but I get the feeling that was something forced on them by microsoft, so I don't blame them for it)... Bethesda is also good (I wasted over 1000 game hours on Morrowind, and lesser amounts on Oblivion and Fallout 3, but overall the games they do are well done)...


LOL the sh**box 360 xD
PC is the only way to go.



Bataar
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Sep 2008
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,848
Location: Post Falls, ID

06 May 2009, 5:23 am

mlqqeae wrote:
ToadOfSteel wrote:
I *hate* FPS games... there's very little strategy involved (except for CTF games, and that is usually just form a blob around the flag carrier)... The only FPS games I have ever played for any substantial period of time are Star Wars Jedi Academy and Counter-strike (the latter only for like a week)... In addition, the multiplayer modes often attract the lowest denominator of gamers, which include the common 12 year old boy, which completely ruins the enjoyability any of these games might have had...

Unlike most of the other people in this thread, I'm a big fan of RTS... The ability to give orders to multiple units opens up a whole field of possibilities... Yes, I've played bad RTS's before, don't get me wrong (I'm looking at you, Rise&Fall)... but even some of the mediocre games still allow for some general strategizing... Star Wars: Empire At War, for all its bugginess, and LOTR: Battle for Middle Earth 2, have what I think is one of the best gameplay systems for an RTS: a hybrid between a "global" turn-based map played in the style of a game of Risk, and individual battlefields that you bring units built in global mode into to do the actual combat, which allows you to control the overall strategy and the more indepth tactical modes at the same time...

When it comes to RPG's it's a mixed bag. I'm not as much a fan of Japanese games (although some good ones like FF8 and FF10 show up), but pretty much anything by Bioware is automatically golden (the only thing I don't like about the company is that they release 6 months earlier on the shitbox 360 than on PC, but I get the feeling that was something forced on them by microsoft, so I don't blame them for it)... Bethesda is also good (I wasted over 1000 game hours on Morrowind, and lesser amounts on Oblivion and Fallout 3, but overall the games they do are well done)...


LOL the sh**box 360 xD
PC is the only way to go.


BS. The PC doesn't get enough good games to say it's the best.



ProfessorX
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Feb 2007
Age: 51
Gender: Male
Posts: 16,795

06 May 2009, 9:26 am

ToadOfSteel, Yes I've always been a fan of rts games in the likes of Rome:Total War or Rsie of Legends and many others that come into this category.Mind you though, I don't have a computer of my own at this moment so, I'm not playing any games :( Still, once I've finally finish building my own computer system I shall pick up on some gaming once more.. :)



Surn
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 27 Apr 2009
Gender: Male
Posts: 22

06 May 2009, 6:43 pm

One stupid game would be Clyde's Adventure. It's an old game for the PC and likely won't run on your computer properly unless you have DOS box. To the point he's a fat-guy in a red hoodie with a magic wand (he also has a mustache). It's not enough that you're dead in one hit (there are no enemies in the game btw) but you loose energy just by walking. There are even invisible triggers you have to trip on to complete some levels.



ToadOfSteel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,157
Location: New Jersey

07 May 2009, 7:23 am

Bataar wrote:
mlqqeae wrote:
LOL the sh**box 360 xD
PC is the only way to go.


BS. The PC doesn't get enough good games to say it's the best.


And yet one thing the PC does control is the RTS genre... there's only one gimped game representing RTS (Halo wars) on consoles that generally lacks in depth compared to even a mediocre PC RTS...

In addition, PC games allow for user mods to spring up... Several companies encourage this by releasing the dev tools for the game (Bethesda always does this for their games), and until XBL decides to carry user-created mods (or even just link to them), user mods will always remain in the domain of the PC...



SabbraCadabra
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Apr 2008
Age: 40
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,765
Location: Michigan

07 May 2009, 1:37 pm

ToadOfSteel wrote:
...until XBL decides to carry user-created mods (or even just link to them), user mods will always remain in the domain of the PC...


Halo 3 allows mods and maps to be created and shared, but it really is as crippled and limited as you can imagine it being. I don't know how the mods work, I guess you just get a selection of options to change, but the mapping is just one big room, and the game lets you place pre-fab walls/objects around the place.

And believe me, the results are almost as bad as what you might've downloaded at CDROM.com back when Quake first came out @_@

Though it's always fun to find a way to jump over a wall and into the empty level beyond :oops:


_________________
I'll brave the storm to come, for it surely looks like rain...


scorpileo
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Mar 2009
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 764
Location: cornwall uk

14 May 2009, 3:36 am

Casual Games I hate them .... I hate them.


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a14s1LcCUWs[/youtube]


or


[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrrvkPo7TZ4[/youtube]


_________________
existence is your only oblitgation
Quietly fighting for the greater good.