It's true that violent games may have an impression on younger kids, however by the time kids turn 13 they've usually drawn the line between reality and virtuality. This, of course, is why we have a rating system to begin with. IMHO, I really don't care for some of the games that are violence for the sake of violence, such as Grand Theft Auto and a lot of the zombie shooters. When I do play shooters, I prefer straight-up war games like Battlefield, C.O.D., Halo, etc. that are combative without being exceptionally violent. However, I will say that video games, like other forms of media such as fiction books, movies, and even some music, are popular because they allow us to escape from the humdrum of life. A lot of gamers claim that violent games are a de-stressor, and I agree with that philosophy. If someone picks on you at school and you hold it in and let the anger fester, chances are you're going to get yourself in a heap of trouble; however, if you go home, boot up Left 4 Dead and project your tormenter's image onto the zombies, then you relieve that stress by carrying out your revenge without actually carrying out your revenge. What politicians don't realize is that blowing off someone's head in a game is much preferable to blowing off someones head in real life. Since you can do things in games that in real life would be illegal, immoral, or even impossible, it helps to blow off some of that 'deviant steam.'
I would love to see politicians try and ban violent games just to see how long it takes for them to repeal the ban after everyone is bitching about the rapid increase in juvenile crime. After all, every kid at home on the Xbox is one less kid on the street corner selling drugs. That's my 2 yen.
Roxas
_________________
"Yeah, so this one time, I tried playing poker with tarot cards... got a full house, and about four people died." ~ Unknown comedian
Happy New Year from WP's resident fortune-teller! May the cards be ever in your favor.