WillMcC wrote:
Personally I'm a little skeptical, but it could be good - time will tell. KQ6 was definitely the peak of the series - professional actors and realistic (for the time) graphics, as well as a good story and puzzles made the game memorable. KQ7 was a little disappointing with the cartoon graphics and the "dumbed down" interface (plus it was extremely sluggish on even high-end hardware of the time - a 486/66 with 8MB of RAM and a double speed CD drive, running Windows 3.11). I didn't even touch Mask of Eternity, as it was too much of a departure from the classic format.
I don't count Mask of Eternity as much of a King's quest actually. It's a hack-and-slash action game with maybe a few simple puzzles thrown in-between rather than an adventure game. Yes, King's Quest 6 is the best of the series, though it came after King's Quest 5 which was a bit of a low point in the series in my opinion. King's Quest 3 was actually the first good King's Quest, being the first game in the series to actually have a story that unfolded through gameplay (the first 2 games had stories but you had to read about them in the manual while you were mostly just doing random stuff in the actual game, trying to achieve the goal).
Judging from the previews I've read by people who have had a first look at this game, I'm actually pretty hopeful. It's an adventure game at least, unlike Mask of Eternity, though it is a full 3D one.