Naked Body Scanner Article.

Post Reply New Topic

http://www.infowars.com/exposed-naked-b ... ort-staff/

Genitals are rather simple and not particularly interesting structures. I would hardly find a depiction of mere genitals sexually attractive as other body features which are rather easy to perceive on anybody in public places are far more sexually interesting. I wonder what the fuss is about.

That is just disturbing. If it can happen to this guy, it can happen to anybody. These scanners are a violation of privacy anyway.

Goldstien's Law - the 2nd form of content used on any new transmission media is always pornography...

What about minors that go through these? I guess some pedophile can get his kicks masturbating to young children, as long as he works for the airport.

Honestly, these things don't violate privacy any more than just about any other "control" there is at airports.

I oppose them because they are utterly unnecessary and a total waste of resources since they are actuall completely ineffective... not because of being afraid of pervs or worried about privacy. The cynic in me makes me think that privacy is already messed up enough.

Honestly, the images generated from these things are completely non-erotic. I mean, look at that blonde, the clothed version is much sexier... So, you would have to have a very broken kind of libido to crave for them... I can't see these images as any more erotic than what some photoshop filters can do to 'hide' cloth.

Also, people have to consider the possibility these pics of a famous actor are just a hoax... I mean, who in his own sanity would do this with a male actor? unless there were tons of women working for security in that airport this sounds just like viral publicity for this guy's new movie.

And that's bad because...?

It keeps the pedophile off the streets and away from the parks and schools, doesn't it? That should be considered a perk!

Although universally publicly disdained, I am fairly sure masturbation is a fairly general alternative to or even accompaniment to the average sexual life. Some people get their kicks from woman's underwear, shoes, feet, etc. I sincerely doubt the graphic representations of crotches alone are violently stimulating any more than these other interests but, after all, these tastes are not generally publicized and information is sparse on the matter.

honestly if they want to see my junk I don't care

my only problem with these scanners is that they take like 40-60 seconds to work

It probably isn't true, just another example of lazy journalism

Here is the show in question:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2BsSb-JoCU

If a stand up comedian had claimed the same thing would you have taken it as fact?