Is reality an artificial Intelligent designed illusion

Page 1 of 2 [ 30 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

02 Aug 2010, 7:30 pm

(1) Is Matter real or an illusion of energy?
(2) Is nature really natural or bio-technology masquerading as "living flesh" and "creatures"?
(3) Why does "life" need super-human DNA software engineering programming to live?

What time was it 5 minutes before the big bang (Before time was invented). If there is no time, how can you have a bang happen at all?
How big was space before the big bang (Before space was invented). If there was no space and no pressure, there can be no need for a big bang at all?
The whole reasoning of the big bang just happened is all flawed to the core.
:wink: :lol: 8) :?



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

02 Aug 2010, 7:35 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
(1) Is Matter real or an illusion of energy?
(2) Is nature really natural or bio-technology masquerading as "living flesh" and "creatures"?
(3) Why does "life" need super-human DNA software engineering programming to live?

What time was it 5 minutes before the big bang (Before time was invented). If there is no time, how can you have a bang happen at all?
How big was space before the big bang (Before space was invented). If there was no space and no pressure, there can be no need for a big bang at all?
The whole reasoning of the big bang just happened is all flawed to the core.
:wink: :lol: 8) :?


And all those astrophysicists and other scientists are utter fools and you hold the key to these monumental questions.



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

02 Aug 2010, 7:52 pm

Question # 1: Does physical matter really exist? Refer to atomic theory.
Does quantum mechanics say solid matter is a reality?

:arrow: Yes or no



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

02 Aug 2010, 7:54 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
Question # 1: Does physical matter really exist? Refer to atomic theory.
Does quantum mechanics say solid matter is a reality?

:arrow: Yes or no


Is there such a thing as reality?

Yes or no.



pgd
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 16 Jul 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,624

02 Aug 2010, 8:05 pm

What is reality?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/String_theory

---

The Truman Show is a 1998 American dramedy film...The cast includes Jim Carrey as Truman Burbank...The film chronicles the life of a man who discovers he is living in a constructed reality soap opera, televised 24/7 to billions across the globe.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Truman_Show

---

Regarding the Big Bang theory, it seems to me that there is evidence of some type of big explosion but it raises the question what was there before the Big Bang.

The Big Bang theory does not answer the question at all (my view).



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

02 Aug 2010, 8:09 pm

All I know is our reality is not natural, and not naturally occurring.
Everything has a structure and a design.

Mass is said to have a structure, and so they look for the fundamental partial causing the effect that mimicries an unreality of mass, and invention of an intelligent mind.
Giving mass to matter, when there is no such thing in the first place. An artificial creation made so real, it is thought to be natural and a real part of the real reality as well.

Physical matter is not really physical. Just energy masquerading / creating the feel of solid matter. So physical matter is really an illusion, an artificial reality of sorts.

Is this not so...
Yes or no?



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

02 Aug 2010, 8:17 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
All I know is our reality is not natural, and not naturally occurring.
Everything has a structure and a design.

Mass is said to have a structure, and so they look for the fundamental partial causing the effect that mimicries an unreality of mass, and invention of an intelligent mind.
Giving mass to matter, when there is no such thing in the first place. An artificial creation made so real, it is thought to be natural and a real part of the real reality as well.

Physical matter is not really physical. Just energy masquerading / creating the feel of solid matter. So physical matter is really an illusion, an artificial reality of sorts.

Is this not so...
Yes or no?


"Natural" is whatever makes you feel comfortable. Nothing observable is not natural.



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

02 Aug 2010, 8:30 pm

So what about nature too?

Is nature really natural or is it an artificial creation, an illusion of sorts.
Is it someone else's bio-technology - masquerading as magical happenings of nature? An illusion of intelligent design on the highest order - artificial life to look so natural no fool would ever be the wiser.

What really is DNA - is it not intelligent programming of the highest order - creating so-called living systems - artificial creatures.
Without DNA instructions those creature are not naturally occurring. You must have the intelligent codes for BUILDING STRUCTURES.

IS that not true...
:arrow: Yes or no?



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

02 Aug 2010, 8:44 pm

Look at it this way...
Before the so-called big bang,

(1) No Time (new structure) never before existed.
(2) No space (new structure) never before existed.
(3) No light, no matter, no planets, no suns, etc.
(4) No designer DNA super-intelligent automated programming. (New structure/ and information) never before existed.

Well the list could go on forever......

So is it naturally occurring or did it need an intelligent designer.
Are artificial creations, illusions of reality at any time NATURALLY OCCURRING?
Is this artificial reality - artificial universe - naturally OCCURRING or Intelligently Designed?


:arrow: Which is it? :!:



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

02 Aug 2010, 9:11 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
Look at it this way...
Before the so-called big bang,

(1) No Time (new structure) never before existed.
(2) No space (new structure) never before existed.
(3) No light, no matter, no planets, no suns, etc.
(4) No designer DNA super-intelligent automated programming. (New structure/ and information) never before existed.

Well the list could go on forever......

So is it naturally occurring or did it need an intelligent designer.
Are artificial creations, illusions of reality at any time NATURALLY OCCURRING?
Is this artificial reality - artificial universe - naturally OCCURRING or Intelligently Designed?


:arrow: Which is it? :!:


And where did this intelligent designer come from? If natural forces could produce an intelligent designer it really doesn't need one.



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

03 Aug 2010, 6:25 am

The answer for "A" comes before the answer for "Z".

Your religious mythology always continually falsifies the complexity problem. The crime of gross over simplification.

(1) DNA is evidence of super-human level of intelligence - biotechnology of making machines that think they themselves are alive.
But your answer often is: Isn't nature wonderful - mother nature - random creator of the gaps (Makes a good joke :D ).

Police do not dismiss criminals just because they have no Postal codes or fix addresses.
Nor should we dismiss the facts of a grand creature just because our eyes are too simple to know his location, size, power level, and photo ID.

Small intellectual steps come before the big ones.
Seeing the gigantic intellectual foot print is our first challenge, first job, and first rules of thought.

Of course your religious view is going to water all this down to nothing special - Mother Nature - random creator of the gaps. :lol:



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

03 Aug 2010, 10:07 am

ResearcherTony wrote:

(1) DNA is evidence of super-human level of intelligence - biotechnology of making machines that think they themselves are alive.
But your answer often is: Isn't nature wonderful - mother nature - random creator of the gaps (Makes a good joke :D ).



There is no positive empirical evidence indicating that DNA was the invention of some intelligent entity. Assuming Design without any evidence for a Designer is a rather futile activity.

ruveyn



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

03 Aug 2010, 9:54 pm

Quote:
ruveyn: There is no positive empirical evidence indicating that DNA was the invention of some intelligent entity. Assuming Design without any evidence for a Designer is a rather futile activity.


There are many empirical lines of evidence.
All true to modern science, unlike yours which are strictly mythical?

Things tend to disorder:
One example is having a box of orderly paper clips, row by row. Randomly shake the box all you wish and you only get maximum disorder.

This cannot be reversed by shaking the box with or without intelligence. This is irreversible without ordered intelligence.
This basic model is irrefutable.
8O Any true computer model will back this up. This is true science and anything saying different is religious mythology.
"It just happens" is not a scientific principle. There are no true models proving such. And Abiogenesis was never proven true. Cannot be replicated.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

03 Aug 2010, 9:56 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
Quote:
ruveyn: There is no positive empirical evidence indicating that DNA was the invention of some intelligent entity. Assuming Design without any evidence for a Designer is a rather futile activity.


There are many empirical lines of evidence.
All true to modern science, unlike yours which are strictly mythical?

[


My mythical science is physics which makes it possible for you to blather nonsense on a computer network.

ruveyn



ResearcherTony
Hummingbird
Hummingbird

User avatar

Joined: 1 Aug 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 20

03 Aug 2010, 10:10 pm

Create a physical model and then do your magic.

Show us all what fools we are - demonstrate the trueness of your winsome words.
Working model please.

Glass of water with a mix.
Paper clips in a box.
Any basic model showing reverse entropy without intelligence. That’s up hill without horsepower :lol:



Sand
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Sep 2007
Age: 99
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,484
Location: Finland

03 Aug 2010, 11:39 pm

ResearcherTony wrote:
Create a physical model and then do your magic.

Show us all what fools we are - demonstrate the trueness of your winsome words.
Working model please.

Glass of water with a mix.
Paper clips in a box.
Any basic model showing reverse entropy without intelligence. That’s up hill without horsepower :lol:


So called reverse entropy generates more entropy to compensate. You really don't know much about what you propose. I hope it is ignorance and not massive stupidity but at the moment the evidence isn't all in.