Corvus wrote:
How did everything get here? Logic cannot conclude this!
If you're referring to the universe itself, this is correct. It's ludicrous to refer to things prior to the universe's existence, given that so was the inception of time, itself. It can no more have "gotten here" than water could get wet.
Quote:
Dont you think being anti-God is as closed minded as being pro-god.
Not at all. Skepticism is an incisive but essential tool for exploring the universe around us. Taking anything at all for granted goes against science. It is based upon skepticism that we continually test and retest theories instead of enshrining them into natural law after a few tests. To realize something as a truth is to be defeated in disproving it. This is why I have been as gentle as I have with Adam. He didn't weakly accept his delusions as reality. He challenged them until he could find no logical alternative to accepting them. Perhaps he's a bit nutty, but I find his character impeccable.
Quote:
The thing is, god can exist in many forms (universe, a rock, etc) where as 'nothing' can only exist in one form - nothing (God may even BE "nothing").
In other words, you are saying that "god" is an empty term. In other words, the term is wholly useless, much like the sort of apologist you seem to be getting this stuff from.
Quote:
One possibility versus a seemingly infinite amount of possibilities - You're believing in the 1?
No, I'm believing in none of them without any rational basis. I'm a pure skeptic. I respect other skeptics, no matter their religious inclinations.