Page 3 of 6 [ 83 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

19 Oct 2012, 4:22 pm

MarketAndChurch wrote:
is it merely describing material reactions in their relationship to one another, or does time, a non-matter, actually exist... Does force exist? It is not material, does it exist? Do numerical values exist? You see nature and the universe ONLY coded through numbers, but do numbers exist?


Everything in this universe can be explained by numbers, so numbers do exists. "Our" base 10 numbers are just approximations, though. In the end, pretty much everything inside the universe can be represented with binary numbers.



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

19 Oct 2012, 4:26 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
In order for an object to move from point A to point B it must first reach a point halfway between point A and point B.

In order for it to reach THAT point it must reach the point halfway between point A and this third point.

In order for it to reach THAT fourth point it must first reach a point halfway between point A and THAT fifth point. .. and so.. for every one of the set of infinite number of points between point A and point B.

Obviously an object cant occupy an infinite number of points in finite time. Thus all motion is impossible.

Since motion is impossible time itself is impossible!

So time doesnt exist!


What you're describing is basic recursion. Recursion is everywhere in nature.

If time and space is discrete (an increasing number of scientists believe this), then this just further prooves the point that both exist.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Oct 2012, 4:34 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
In order for an object to move from point A to point B it must first reach a point halfway between point A and point B.

In order for it to reach THAT point it must reach the point halfway between point A and this third point.

In order for it to reach THAT fourth point it must first reach a point halfway between point A and THAT fifth point. .. and so.. for every one of the set of infinite number of points between point A and point B.

Obviously an object cant occupy an infinite number of points in finite time. Thus all motion is impossible.

Since motion is impossible time itself is impossible!

So time doesnt exist!


Zeno's old saw. Sum up the negative powers of 2 and you get a finite number.

ruveyn



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

19 Oct 2012, 4:55 pm

ruveyn wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
In order for an object to move from point A to point B it must first reach a point halfway between point A and point B.

In order for it to reach THAT point it must reach the point halfway between point A and this third point.

In order for it to reach THAT fourth point it must first reach a point halfway between point A and THAT fifth point. .. and so.. for every one of the set of infinite number of points between point A and point B.

Obviously an object cant occupy an infinite number of points in finite time. Thus all motion is impossible.

Since motion is impossible time itself is impossible!

So time doesnt exist!


Zeno's old saw. Sum up the negative powers of 2 and you get a finite number.

ruveyn


Correct. But the ancient Greeks in Xeno's time were unfamiliar with convergence and mathematical series. :) It made sense to them.

One of the earliest persons to discover mathematical series was Archimedes.



MarketAndChurch
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2011
Age: 37
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,022
Location: The Peoples Republic Of Portland

19 Oct 2012, 5:00 pm

Kurgan wrote:
MarketAndChurch wrote:
is it merely describing material reactions in their relationship to one another, or does time, a non-matter, actually exist... Does force exist? It is not material, does it exist? Do numerical values exist? You see nature and the universe ONLY coded through numbers, but do numbers exist?


Everything in this universe can be explained by numbers, so numbers do exists. "Our" base 10 numbers are just approximations, though. In the end, pretty much everything inside the universe can be represented with binary numbers.


Exactly, and I'm just asking whether something that is not material exists. Be it Force, or Time, what have you. Does Force exist? What is it materially composed of? Or is it the mere reaction and relationship between existing matter. Numbers permeate everything, but does the numerical value of 5 exist. Is the material world view too limiting and are we to dumb down our perceptions just to make the suggestion that "matter is all there is" work?

    Is it just a mode of matter, and beyond that, nonexistent, only descriptive?


What is functions, energies, and waves of probability? What are they materially composed of?


_________________
It is not up to you to finish the task, nor are you free to desist from trying.


AnotherKind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 769
Location: Neverland

19 Oct 2012, 5:02 pm

[deleted]

How did time evolved IF it is distinct from space?

IF time and space are the same, is it bounded by our perception or it is independent?

Does any space and time continue to exist after we'll be dead?

Is our perception of time accurate? What about space?

What about other dimensions...


_________________
Agnostic atheist. Hardcore determinist. Misanthrope. Objectivist. INTP.
AS: 165, NT: 44


naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

19 Oct 2012, 6:07 pm

AnotherKind wrote:
[deleted]

How did time evolved IF it is distinct from space?

IF time and space are the same, is it bounded by our perception or it is independent?

Does any space and time continue to exist after we'll be dead?

Is OUR perception of time accurate? What about space?

What about other dimensions...


Time already ceased to exist.

Yesterday!



Kurgan
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 6 Apr 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 4,132
Location: Scandinavia

19 Oct 2012, 6:14 pm

naturalplastic wrote:
AnotherKind wrote:
[deleted]

How did time evolved IF it is distinct from space?

IF time and space are the same, is it bounded by our perception or it is independent?

Does any space and time continue to exist after we'll be dead?

Is OUR perception of time accurate? What about space?

What about other dimensions...


Time already ceased to exist.

Yesterday!


If it did, then there would be no yesterday.

If time inside this universe froze for 15 multiverse seconds (I'm not saying that there's any multiverse outside this univese, this is just a thought experiment), nobody inside this universe would notice.



naturalplastic
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2010
Age: 69
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,189
Location: temperate zone

19 Oct 2012, 7:44 pm

Kurgan wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
AnotherKind wrote:
[deleted]

How did time evolved IF it is distinct from space?

IF time and space are the same, is it bounded by our perception or it is independent?

Does any space and time continue to exist after we'll be dead?

Is OUR perception of time accurate? What about space?

What about other dimensions...


Time already ceased to exist.

Yesterday!


If it did, then there would be no yesterday.

If time inside this universe froze for 15 multiverse seconds (I'm not saying that there's any multiverse outside this univese, this is just a thought experiment), nobody inside this universe would notice.


That was kinda my point. It was a joke.

But the same paradox is in the above question asked by Anotherkind.

"how did time evolve?"

Evolution means "change over time".

So how could "time itsself change over time"?

Answer that!



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

19 Oct 2012, 8:59 pm

Kurgan wrote:
ruveyn wrote:
naturalplastic wrote:
In order for an object to move from point A to point B it must first reach a point halfway between point A and point B.

In order for it to reach THAT point it must reach the point halfway between point A and this third point.

In order for it to reach THAT fourth point it must first reach a point halfway between point A and THAT fifth point. .. and so.. for every one of the set of infinite number of points between point A and point B.

Obviously an object cant occupy an infinite number of points in finite time. Thus all motion is impossible.

Since motion is impossible time itself is impossible!

So time doesnt exist!


Zeno's old saw. Sum up the negative powers of 2 and you get a finite number.

ruveyn


Correct. But the ancient Greeks in Xeno's time were unfamiliar with convergence and mathematical series. :) It made sense to them.

One of the earliest persons to discover mathematical series was Archimedes.


He invented integral calculus 1700 years before Newton and Leibniz.

ruveyn



JNathanK
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 28 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,177

19 Oct 2012, 10:00 pm

Time ultimately amounts to relative motion, and relativity relies on the contrast between matter and empty space and how it changes in relation to itself. If this contrast ceased to be and all was homogenous, time would cease to be. We often confuse time for that ticking device on the wall, but clocks are just abstractions that represent the real thing, and the real thing in a clock is found in the relative positions of the gears and the motion constantly changing them, not so much the symbols on it.



Toy_Soldier
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,370

19 Oct 2012, 11:20 pm

I don't think Time as a dimenson exsists. At least I see no proof of it and no evidence of being able to move along it, as in forwards or backwards. I think time is just a way of us concieving of the history of things, like writing what you did today in a diary.



spacebrain
Snowy Owl
Snowy Owl

User avatar

Joined: 3 Jan 2011
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 162

19 Oct 2012, 11:37 pm

If a tree falls in the woods...

If this universe is finite, then time is in between two states of inexistence. Can this time be said to have existed without an observer? In my opinion, no, time only exists insofar as it can be experienced.



AnotherKind
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 14 Dec 2011
Age: 34
Gender: Male
Posts: 769
Location: Neverland

20 Oct 2012, 3:36 am

Toy_Soldier wrote:
I don't think Time as a dimenson exsists. At least I see no proof of it and no evidence of being able to move along it, as in forwards or backwards. I think time is just a way of us concieving of the history of things, like writing what you did today in a diary.


Moving from a point to another is made in time, as the evolution of the matter, as every modification made in nature and the same applies to the process of thinking. And if it is not made in time then it is safe to say that all the matter appeared suddenly out of nowhere? If it 'appeared' suddenly could be infinite?

Before we were born, was there any time? Could time exist outside of our perception? We - as matter and energy - evolve in the same time with time? Could time be ahead of us? Why decisions are already taken by our brains 6 seconds before of our understanding? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6S9OidmNZM


_________________
Agnostic atheist. Hardcore determinist. Misanthrope. Objectivist. INTP.
AS: 165, NT: 44


Toy_Soldier
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,370

20 Oct 2012, 7:10 am

spacebrain wrote:
If a tree falls in the woods...

If this universe is finite, then time is in between two states of inexistence. Can this time be said to have existed without an observer? In my opinion, no, time only exists insofar as it can be experienced.


If a Tree fell on a Mime in the woods...

would anybody care ?

Sorry...it just reminded me of that. I shouldn't add Mimes to the mix. Will screw everything up. :lol:



Toy_Soldier
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 17 Jul 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,370

20 Oct 2012, 7:17 am

AnotherKind wrote:
Toy_Soldier wrote:
I don't think Time as a dimenson exsists. At least I see no proof of it and no evidence of being able to move along it, as in forwards or backwards. I think time is just a way of us concieving of the history of things, like writing what you did today in a diary.


Moving from a point to another is made in time, as the evolution of the matter, as every modification made in nature and the same applies to the process of thinking. And if it is not made in time then it is safe to say that all the matter appeared suddenly out of nowhere? If it 'appeared' suddenly could be infinite?

Before we were born, was there any time? Could time exist outside of our perception? We - as matter and energy - evolve in the same time with time? Could time be ahead of us? Why decisions are already taken by our brains 6 seconds before of our understanding? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N6S9OidmNZM


Well.... I am a little slow on the uptake. Especially before I have had my coffee! :lol: This subject, maybe more then any other gives me the feeling my head will explode.

"I love the smell of exploded brains in the morning. Smells like... Victory"

Toy_Soldier in 'Zombie Apocalyspe Now'