Rampant issues with feminism....

Post Reply New Topic

Hey, you are screaming at women, just because they dont share your oppinion. So if women do like bad men who rebel against social conversations skills, i do not understand why you should have got a problem? According to your theory there should be lots of women who should fall in love with you. ^^

But if you are still interested in tipps for women, most dont like guys who scream aorund. So for me, if you screamed at me, that would be the second you would see my back without any goodbye. There is a difference with "lack of social skills" and "having no manners anyway".

I know of a woman that would probably say I'm a mean guy, but then again she tried to sexually harass me in front of a coworker, so I was rather rude to her in response. I also informed the manager in case she ever decided to come back. She was also a great deal older than me, which made it even more creepy.

My dear Friend,

I know of no Medicine fit to diminish the violent natural Inclinations you mention; and if I did, I think I should not communicate it to you. Marriage is the proper Remedy. It is the most natural State of Man, and therefore the State in which you are most likely to find solid Happiness. Your Reasons against entering into it at present, appear to me not well-founded. The circumstantial Advantages you have in View by postponing it, are not only uncertain, but they are small in comparison with that of the Thing itself, the being married and settled. It is the Man and Woman united that make the compleat human Being. Separate, she wants his Force of Body and Strength of Reason; he, her Softness, Sensibility and acute Discernment. Together they are more likely to succeed in the World. A single Man has not nearly the Value he would have in that State of Union. He is an incomplete Animal. He resembles the odd Half of a Pair of Scissars. If you get a prudent healthy Wife, your Industry in your Profession, with her good Economy, will be a Fortune sufficient.

But if you will not take this Counsel, and persist in thinking a Commerce with the Sex inevitable, then I repeat my former Advice, that in all your Amours you should prefer old Women to young ones. You call this a Paradox, and demand my Reasons. They are these:

i. Because as they have more Knowledge of the World and their Minds are better stor'd with Observations, their Conversation is more improving and more lastingly agreable.

2. Because when Women cease to be handsome, they study to be good. To maintain their Influence over Men, they supply the Diminution of Beauty by an Augmentation of Utility. They learn to do a 1000 Services small and great, and are the most tender and useful of all Friends when you are sick. Thus they continue amiable. And hence there is hardly such a thing to be found as an old Woman who is not a good Woman.

3. Because there is no hazard of Children, which irregularly produc'd may be attended with much Inconvenience.

4. Because thro' more Experience, they are more prudent and discreet in conducting an Intrigue to prevent Suspicion. The Commerce with them is therefore safer with regard to your Reputation. And with regard to theirs, if the Affair should happen to be known, considerate People might be rather inclin'd to excuse an old Woman who would kindly take care of a young Man, form his Manners by her good Counsels, and prevent his ruining his Health and Fortune among mercenary Prostitutes.

5. Because in every Animal that walks upright, the Deficiency of the Fluids that fill the Muscles appears first in the highest Part: The Face first grows lank and wrinkled; then the Neck; then the Breast and Arms; the lower Parts continuing to the last as plump as ever: So that covering all above with a Basket, and regarding only what is below the Girdle, it is impossible of two Women to know an old from a young one. And as in the dark all Cats are grey, the Pleasure of corporal Enjoyment with an old Woman is at least equal, and frequently superior, every Knack being by Practice capable of Improvement.

6. Because the Sin is less. The debauching a Virgin may be her Ruin, and make her for Life unhappy.

7. Because the Compunction is less. The having made a young Girl miserable may give you frequent bitter Reflections; none of which can attend the making an old Woman happy.

8thly and Lastly They are so grateful!!

Thus much for my Paradox. But still I advise you to marry directly; being sincerely Your affectionate Friend.

I always find it a little bit amusing how men - quite often, men who are unwillingly single- will not only go into lengthy diatribes about "what women want," but will flat out tell women who disagree with them that they're wrong.

Seconded.

I think it's a defense mechanism. Claiming that women reject you because you're just too darned NICE is much more pleasant than facing the reality of your faults.

If your target remains healthy, nubile, attractive women between the ages of 18 and 29, then you might want to take honest stock of what you have to offer them. You have a lot of competition, and if you think that you are coming up short, then you might consider seeking a bride abroad, where a woman who meets your requirements will be thrilled at what you have to offer. Or, give some thought to loosening your standards for potential partners in your home country.

Oh, and am I the only one who thinks that David Beckham's suit is f***ing ugly?

What you seem to want is a guy who's nice but also assertive. However, that doesn't change the fact that it's actually sexist and misandrist to characterize all those so-called "nice guys" as guys who just being nice to get sex. That is no different from saying that women who unwillingly single deserve to be single because they only want walking dildos, but we don't say that or do we? The fact is, many of those "nice guys" really want a relationship like everyone else but just don't have the social skills to do it. Last time I checked, people who think they are "entitled" to something, don't think they have to earn it. Since when is having romantic feelings for someone and being nice to them the same thing as being entitled anyway (whether they express those feelings feelings and ask them out or not)?

Are you trying to establish a correlation between the argument "men like attractive young women" and the argument "women like jerks"? If so, I don't follow.

A woman over 30 is a cougar? When I first herd the word, it referred to women after menopause -50ish, in most cases.

Cougar: A 35+ year old female who is on the "hunt" for a much younger, energetic, willing-to-do-anything male. The cougar can frequently be seen in a padded bra, cleavage exposed, propped up against a swanky bar in San Francisco (or other cities)waiting, watching, calculating; gearing up to sink her claws into an innocent young and strapping buck who happens to cross her path.

Cougar: An attractive woman in her 30's or 40's who is on the hunt once again. She may be found in the usual hunting grounds: nightclubs, bars, beaches, etc. She will not play the usual B.S. games that women in their early twenties participate in. End state, she will be going for the kill, just like you.

A woman's market value is entirely dependent on her looks?

If you can afford for your wife to not work, then you would make a decent partner for a woman who has made a career out of perfecting her looks - because, face it, that type of face and body take a lot of work and a lot of money to maintain. If you're a woman who wants to do that, you sort of *have* to find a rich trophy husband, because you probably haven't learned any skills beyond making yourself look like a trophy.

If you're looking for a trophy, though, you're not looking for a partner. If, when you talk about women, you talk about 'nubile young bodies' and 'cougars,' you aren't looking for a partner; you're stereotyping body classes with the brains detached. You literally want a sexually functional robot to stick your dick in. And you shouldn't complain when women who *are* looking for a partner - say, most women who are going to college, for example - don't want much to do with you. Because that's not nice.

[...] but saying that they want someone nice is usually not a lie, and not a stereotype.

I think this isn't only about what women say they "want", but also how they tell guys to "act".

Whenever I've asked a girl for tips on for instance, approaching someone on the dance floor, I get the answer that I should "be careful", and "make sure I don't do something that doesn't feel okay [for the girl]"

Though I can understand their point of view (having had lots of bad experiences), this is "not" the kind of thing I (nor any shy/nice guy for that matter) would need to hear. I'm already inhibited as I am, I don't need any extra amount of respect.

There seems to be this idea floating around that guys are inherently pushy/bold/disrespectful, and that all guys somehow "need" to be cautioned/put in their place, so that they don't hurt someone. This is dead wrong IMO...

"It's the task of each teacher not to equate evil and activity, nor good and passitivity" (paraphrased from a really good book I read...)