Should Women be Permitted to Appear Topless in Public?

Post Reply New Topic

If you look at some of the major monuments in Washington, DC

General Sherman's: http://www.dcmemorials.com/index_indiv0000735.htm

The First Army Division Monument: http://www.dcmemorials.com/index_indiv0000870.htm

100 years ago, people apparently weren't offended by a nice, perky pair of tits.

However, this Boy Scout memorial from 1964:




Something about the Boy Scout Memorial does seem wildly inappropriate. I wonder why no-one ever said anything?

I was reminded of a debate my class was made to do about art. Girls did the photo boys and me did the painting(I am a girl but I wanted to do the painting because I couldn't find a decent starting point for my side on photo) It was of a saint playing the violn while angel babies appeared to her. I was on the defending side. One guy on the opposing side (I think it was only me, a defending boy and the opposing boy who were active. I think they may have been the only boys in the group or the others didn't have much to say.) He said, among other thngs that the picture was pornographic because the angels were naked. I went on to say I did disagree, as it was not exploitive and that there where many dfferent ways nudity could be used in art ( think I used the nude Pax and those babies in the painting behind me.) The gallery we went to see next had a lot of nudity, so I hope he discarded the nudity=pornography notion or else I fear he may have been quite offended!

I agree with EtherealBallet.
Nudism preaches upon acceptance and desensitization of the female/male body. I agree with that.

Best Regards,

Jake

I support women going topless...after a rigorous application and licensing process!

However, this Boy Scout memorial from 1964:




Something about the Boy Scout Memorial does seem wildly inappropriate. I wonder why no-one ever said anything?

Teach men more self control, so that women can feel comfortable without their shirts on in the first place. lol, seriously. This is why I became a lesbian.

If they want.

It is rather a puzzlement, isn't it?

Boobies are to be regarded as such dirty, awful, offensive things that they need to be hidden from view in the modern Anglophone world.

But, women go to a lot of trouble to create the impression that they have big, impressive knockers, and dress to draw attention to them. Men aren't supposed to stare at them, or that is sexual harassment. And, women are disappointed if men don't stare at them.

Men are not biologically the same as women. No matter what hormones you inject in a man you will not be able to get them to lactate. For women they are most definite a defining factor of their sex role in biology.

For women it is an orifice, for men it is not.

Covering an orifice (and functional gland under it) makes sense. To protect one's own biological parts.

Women should be allowed to let it all hang out and bounce away as they jog! *ducks and dodges flying debris thrown by angry women* I mean umm they should be free to express their natural body whenever they see fit if us guys can be topless why cant women? *gets ready to duck but instead hears women cheering and throwing roses* Hehe whew *whipes the sweat off his forehead in relief*

Maybe that flame is some sort of personal gratification device.The man has a painful look on his face,not from the hemorrhoids,maybe from that "flame" thing.

Not only permitted, but mandated.

Anyone who is offended at the sight of bare bosoms might wish to avoid Miami Beach this time of year

http://lubbockonline.com/stories/041199 ... 9022.shtml

Here is one lady, Miss Chelsea Charms, who went took the desire to out-boob the competition to an extreme level




Anyone who gawks is a sexist pig. And, anyone who doesn't gawk is also being offensive.