Ding Dong The Witch is Dead set to top the UK charts

Page 3 of 4 [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Arran
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 375

13 Apr 2013, 6:56 am

Britain has lost more manufacturing under Blair than Thatcher. Nobody demonises Blair because he is a lefty.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,835
Location: London

13 Apr 2013, 7:05 am

Arran wrote:
Nobody demonises Blair

Not true: http://www.arrestblair.org/
Arran wrote:
he is a lefty.

Also not true, Blair moved Labour to the right. He was liberal on some social issues, but economically New Labour was a very different beast to the party of Wilson and Callaghan.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

13 Apr 2013, 7:08 am

The_Walrus wrote:
He was liberal on some social issues, but economically New Labour was a very different beast to the party of Wilson and Callaghan.


Blair was deeply authoritarian on civil liberties and freedoms. Any 'liberalism' on his part was cosmetic at best.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,835
Location: London

13 Apr 2013, 7:45 am

Tequila wrote:
The_Walrus wrote:
He was liberal on some social issues, but economically New Labour was a very different beast to the party of Wilson and Callaghan.


Blair was deeply authoritarian on civil liberties and freedoms. Any 'liberalism' on his part was cosmetic at best.

Minimum wage, civil partnerships, Lisbon Treaty, working rights improved, and he valued the environment. Dispersal orders and his drugs policy were fairly authoritarian, yes.



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

13 Apr 2013, 7:50 am

Arran wrote:
Britain has lost more manufacturing under Blair than Thatcher. Nobody demonises Blair because he is a lefty.


Blair was not a lefty. He got rid of Clause 4 from the Labour party and embraced free markets.

He was demonized over the Iraq war.



TrainofLove
Velociraptor
Velociraptor

User avatar

Joined: 31 Jul 2012
Age: 28
Gender: Male
Posts: 416
Location: New Zealand

14 Apr 2013, 12:48 am

Just more typical hatred from left wing liberal nutjobs. Let them have their fun, they're the ones looking like idiots.


_________________
"He was slower than a nudist trying to climb a barbed wire fence" - Benny Hill


0_equals_true
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 5 Apr 2007
Age: 42
Gender: Male
Posts: 11,038
Location: London

14 Apr 2013, 5:12 am

Robdemanc wrote:
Arran wrote:
Britain has lost more manufacturing under Blair than Thatcher. Nobody demonises Blair because he is a lefty.


Blair was not a lefty. He got rid of Clause 4 from the Labour party and embraced free markets.

He was demonized over the Iraq war.


Well that was his biggest mistake. Whether you think he should be demonized entirely, I think it is important that he not get off lightly, so we don't repeat the mistake. I this he has become more slippery with power, he commands a huge wage for envoy and consultancy, that is not going to help the situation in the middle east one bit.

If there real was a potential threat it could have been dealt with like the previous time Iraq had a program.

Iraq had to bluff, because it has attacked Iran previously.

I do agree if he hadn't made this mistake and focused on the Afghanistan, he probably wouldn't be some vilified, in fact he was re-elected three times. He as pretty popular before Iraq.



Arran
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 20 Nov 2012
Gender: Male
Posts: 375

14 Apr 2013, 7:05 am

The_Walrus wrote:
Arran wrote:
Nobody demonises Blair

Not true: http://www.arrestblair.org/
Arran wrote:
he is a lefty.

Also not true, Blair moved Labour to the right. He was liberal on some social issues, but economically New Labour was a very different beast to the party of Wilson and Callaghan.


You missed the point. I was referring to manufacturing industry. Thatcher is vilified for destroying large swathes of British manufacturing but Blair isn't.



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

14 Apr 2013, 11:02 am

Robdemanc wrote:
Arran wrote:
Britain has lost more manufacturing under Blair than Thatcher. Nobody demonises Blair because he is a lefty.


Blair was not a lefty. He got rid of Clause 4 from the Labour party and embraced free markets.

.


That was a wise thing to do. Give a Prole a telly to watch, some beer to drink and something to f*ck and he is a happy Prole.

ruveyn



Robdemanc
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 May 2010
Age: 47
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: England

14 Apr 2013, 1:30 pm

The campaign didn't work as the song didn't reach number one.

However, it sold over 50,000 copies and entered the chart at number 2 and it now holds the record of the shortest song ever (51 seconds) to make the top 10.



pluto
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Age: 63
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,576
Location: Paisley,Scotland UK

15 Apr 2013, 1:00 pm

It did however make No 1 in the official Scottish chart,which runs in tandem with the UK one.


_________________
I have lost the will to be apathetic


Declension
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2012
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,807

16 Apr 2013, 4:01 am

I think there's something a bit icky about the idea that you should never speak ill of the recently departed.

It makes sense if they are somebody that you knew personally, and you are at their funeral or something. But the rule should not be extended to public figures. Public figures, especially politicians, can have a huge effect on the world. By saying "you're not allowed to speak ill of Margaret Thatcher", you're basically saying "you're not allowed to say that Margaret Thatcher's policies were bad". They are inseparable.



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

16 Apr 2013, 4:56 am

Declension wrote:
I think there's something a bit icky about the idea that you should never speak ill of the recently departed.

It makes sense if they are somebody that you knew personally, and you are at their funeral or something. But the rule should not be extended to public figures. Public figures, especially politicians, can have a huge effect on the world. By saying "you're not allowed to speak ill of Margaret Thatcher", you're basically saying "you're not allowed to say that Margaret Thatcher's policies were bad". They are inseparable.


No, by all means people should criticise her policies and her legacy. People don't have to be ultra-respectful whilst they're doing it either

I personally wouldn't want people to retreat into fake mawkishness over my death. I would want people to be honest about my faults.

Big difference between that and wanting to jump on someone's grave, to hold massive street parties, to smash up Barnardo's and to threaten my funeral.

I suppose even some form of 'celebration' that could be partially understood if Thatcher had died in, say, 1986.



Last edited by Tequila on 16 Apr 2013, 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.

Utnapishtim
Raven
Raven

User avatar

Joined: 29 Nov 2012
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 124
Location: Liverpool, UK

16 Apr 2013, 5:07 am

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013 ... ers-police

So Tequila do you think it is right for the police to ask demonstrates to tell them how they wish to protest at the funeral, in order to prevent arrests under section 5 of the Public Order Act?



Tequila
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Age: 36
Gender: Male
Posts: 28,897
Location: Lancashire, UK

16 Apr 2013, 7:00 am

Utnapishtim wrote:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2013/apr/14/thatcher-funeral-protesters-police

So Tequila do you think it is right for the police to ask demonstrates to tell them how they wish to protest at the funeral, in order to prevent arrests under section 5 of the Public Order Act?


Yes, I do think there should be some limitations. People should be allowed to, for example, turn their backs. They shouldn't be allowed to disturb grieving people or disrupt the funeral itself or block traffic with their protest.

Do you agree with Westboro Baptist Church getting full rights to picket funerals and disturb the proceedings?



Last edited by Tequila on 16 Apr 2013, 7:12 am, edited 1 time in total.

Cornflake
Administrator
Administrator

User avatar

Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 68,580
Location: Over there

16 Apr 2013, 7:12 am

Isn't that a fairly standard action from the police though, where they're expecting some form of protest?
They recognise and try to accommodate the right to protest, but not to the extent of it disrupting proceedings.

This is the funeral of an old lady, not some sort of arms shipment passing through where there might be a more pressing reason to disrupt or stop it.
Turning their backs as the coffin passes says quite enough.


_________________
Giraffe: a ruminant with a view.