Geekonychus wrote:
He states his metaphor very clearly in my opinion nor does he deny other forms of privledge don't exist. Just because you're on the easiest setting doesn't mean you're going to do better than others on different settings.
Maybe he doesn't deny their existence, but he doesn't seem to recognize the size of some of those advantages.
I'm not arguing that minorities are privileged, nor gay people. Because, if they are, I haven't seen how. It's the male part I take issue with.
For example; it's harder for women to rise to prominent positions in business or government. I won't argue with that. Over on the other side of the socio-economic spectrum however, it's harder for men to avoid homelessness. Yeah, if you only look at the top of the heap, it's mostly men up there. But no one ever looks at the very bottom where, surprise, it's mostly men too. And guess what, the people at the bottom
vastly outnumber the people at the top.
Or another example; much is made of the fact that black people recieve much harsher sentences than white people for similar crimes. But very few seem to notice that gender is an even better predictor of how harsh a sentence will be than race is.
The fact that women have to be fearful of sexual assault while men do not is used as an example of male privilege. And it is one. But the fact that men are exponentially more likely to be the victim of literally every single other type of violent crime up to and including murder is never seen as female privilege.
I don't know, I guess I just don't see "more likely to end up homeless" or "treated more harshly by authorities" or "more likely to be beaten or robbed or murdered" as "playing on the easiest setting."