Page 3 of 10 [ 145 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ... 10  Next


If this is the case, is the ACA worth it?
YES 43%  43%  [ 13 ]
NO 40%  40%  [ 12 ]
UNDECIDED 17%  17%  [ 5 ]
Total votes : 30

simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

05 Feb 2014, 8:03 pm

People with serious illnesses won't have to kill themselves working 40 hours to keep their health insurance? The horror. This story comes around every year like clockwork. It's not new.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

05 Feb 2014, 8:35 pm

Raptor wrote:
Hmmm......The No's are ahead by 9%. Looks like those dumb republicans were right after all. :P


Just because a majority of people are voting a certain way doesn't mean that they are right. :shameonyou:



ruveyn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 21 Sep 2008
Age: 88
Gender: Male
Posts: 31,502
Location: New Jersey

05 Feb 2014, 9:14 pm

ACA is a political witch's brew that combines the worst features of government inefficiency and incompetence with corporate malfeasance. The worst outcome is the disabling of private medical care for everyone except the very rich. If I didn't know any better I would think our Elected King Lord Obama is trying to wreck private medical care and plow the road for Single Payer Medical Insurance. Then we can join Canada and wait six months for an MRI.

ruveyn



kittygirl0811
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker
Yellow-bellied Woodpecker

User avatar

Joined: 28 Jul 2012
Age: 47
Gender: Female
Posts: 54

05 Feb 2014, 9:16 pm

There are a lot of good things about obamacare. But I don't like forcing people to have health insurance. I feel it should be a personal choice. I do hear of companies forcing employees to work 30 hours or less just so they don't have to cover insurance. I feel this is wrong and unethical. But part-time work is still work. I'm so torn about this whole obamacare issue.


_________________
AS 39 || Apsie quiz 146 || SQ 44 || EQ 17
Broad Spectrum Phenotype: autistic/bap


Raptor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Mar 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 12,997
Location: Southeast U.S.A.

05 Feb 2014, 9:32 pm

ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Hmmm......The No's are ahead by 9%. Looks like those dumb republicans were right after all. :P


Just because a majority of people are voting a certain way doesn't mean that they are right. :shameonyou:


In that case, Obama shouldn't be the president. :P

BTW, don't you have about 2 dozen (for this week) of your own frivolous polls and threads to watch over?


_________________
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."
- Thomas Jefferson


TheGoggles
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,060

05 Feb 2014, 11:55 pm

The level of discourse is so elevated my ears are popping.



Inventor
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 15 Feb 2007
Gender: Male
Posts: 6,014
Location: New Orleans

06 Feb 2014, 2:28 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
luanqibazao wrote:
One way or another, there's going to be fewer and fewer people working less and less, supporting more and more who do not work. Sure hope they don't go on strike.


"Fewer people working less and less?" Are they to be accompanied by "more people working more and more?"

The more people who voluntarily leave the work force, the better things will be for people who remain in the workforce.


The Elephant in this is the War Babies, 45 million, who the oldest are just 67, full Social Security, and the youngest 62. They are hanging in because they all see this Recession as rigged to reduce their Social Security over the rest of their life.

As Social Security is rigged, counting the last five years more than the thirty five before, people are hanging in for the bigger check.

Now some will not get more, and Social Security does come with health care.

Instead of raising the age to retire, we should make it easier. 30 million job openings would do wonders for the younger workers.

In some two income families, one works for the cost of living, the other for healthcare payments. It is Insurance, it is easy to lose everything.

Taking people out of the workforce, opens places for other people.

For some, Food Stamps and Obama Care would cover their needs. They are at the bottom, where wage rates are stuck, and having to wear a fast food uniform, is considered lower than the same pay with real clothes, and less Corporate Franchise Rules.

So some Artists and Musicians will live better. We need that. Less demand for employment means higher wages.

The War Babies are leaving like the Black Death, a third of the workforce over the next decade.

New hires used to be cheaper, but that crop will be picked over quickly, and new grads will be getting good job offers.

We do not have the employment for a Blue Collar Middle Class, they have to educate up, or settle for what they are worth.

Also machines will continue to replace jobs. The population will drop.

Someone with a four year work record at low wages will be picked over someone with a Degree in Art, or Gender Studies.

So as the War Babies fade into Sunset Acres, this America of Cultural Disorder, these Brownfields, and falling bridges, will all be yours to rule over.

China will have more people with Doctorates than you have people.

Now Social Security is paying the people born between WWI and WWII, They were few.

The War Babies are many, and are hardly drawing their first check. for the next three decades, they are the first to be paid, or the Government will be voted out. You will pay them.

Worldwide, Starving diseased people dying of thirst will do anything to be thrown in your jails.

They will do your job for one bowl of rice a day, and a cardboard box to live in.



Shau
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 24 Oct 2009
Age: 165
Gender: Male
Posts: 1,270

06 Feb 2014, 3:24 am

*Shrug*

We've got public healthcare here in New Zealand, and have had such for a long time. Society has yet to implode, and people don't seem to be dropping dead from sickness, injury, or disease due to wait times. When you want something non-urgent treated faster, you've got private options at your disposal if you've got the cash. If you DON'T have the cash, you're not completely screwed. It's win/win for everyone.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

06 Feb 2014, 7:46 am

Raptor wrote:
ArrantPariah wrote:
Raptor wrote:
Hmmm......The No's are ahead by 9%. Looks like those dumb republicans were right after all. :P


Just because a majority of people are voting a certain way doesn't mean that they are right. :shameonyou:


In that case, Obama shouldn't be the president. :P

BTW, don't you have about 2 dozen (for this week) of your own frivolous polls and threads to watch over?


Remember: most people voted for Al Gore to be president in 2000. In the end, there were only 9 votes that mattered. :skull:



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

06 Feb 2014, 9:49 am

:roll: Maybe this article explains the issue more clearly:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/fact-chec ... 15113.html

Quote:
...New estimates that President Barack Obama's health care law will encourage millions of Americans to leave the workforce or reduce their work hours have touched off an I-told-you-so chorus from Republicans, who've claimed all along that the law will kill jobs. But some aren't telling it straight.

The analysis by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office predicts the law will give several million people an opportunity to work less or not at all, because they won't be stuck in jobs just for the sake of keeping the health insurance they get from employers. To some Republicans, that amounts to "wreaking havoc on working families," ''dire consequences for workers" and a shower of pink slips across the land — conclusions unsupported by the report.

The study estimates that the workforce will be reduced by the equivalent of 2.3 million full-time workers by 2021 as people choose to leave it. More would take early retirement, work fewer hours or otherwise rearrange their work-home balance to take advantage of new subsidies for health insurance and new markets for individual policies that don't depend on having a job.

In a key point overlooked in the GOP response, the report says, "The estimated reduction stems almost entirely from a net decline in the amount of labor that workers choose to supply, rather than from a net drop in businesses' demand for labor."

In other words, workers aren't being laid off. They are taking themselves out of the workforce, in many cases opening job opportunities for others.


But, the majority of people are being suckered by the Repubnican misinterpretations. :roll:

The Same Article wrote:
A look at some of the Republican claims and how they compare with the facts:

SEN. MARCO RUBIO of Florida: "Just yesterday, the Congressional Budget Office found that Obamacare will cost millions of Americans their jobs."

REP. JOHN KLINE of Minnesota: "The president's health care law is destroying full-time jobs. ... This fatally flawed health care scheme is wreaking havoc on working families nationwide."

REP. PHIL GINGREY of Georgia: Obamacare creates "unprecedented uncertainty for job creators that, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, will leave millions of people looking for work in the next few years."


Either deliberate lies or outright stupidity. :roll:



Shrapnel
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 4 Jul 2013
Gender: Male
Posts: 555

06 Feb 2014, 10:46 am

^^^ The article you cite contained only one fact:

Quote:
No one knows whether the health care law will turn out to be good or bad for jobs and the economy. Everything is guesswork, however educated the guess.
The budget office, generally respected by both sides but not infallible, predicts some elements of the health care law will help job growth and other parts will hurt it.


So you are either being disingenuous or you're symptomatic of your own premise.



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

06 Feb 2014, 11:05 am

Yes, everything is guesswork. But that doesn't change the fact that the Repugnicans are either profound liars or abject idiots, as evidenced by their misinterpretations of the CBO report.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

06 Feb 2014, 11:11 am

This is truly hilarious, you actually have people trying to sell the welfare trap as a good thing! :lol:



ArrantPariah
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Mar 2012
Age: 121
Gender: Male
Posts: 7,972

06 Feb 2014, 11:54 am

While many legitimate bases for attacking the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may exist, the assertion "Duuuhhhh.....the CBO sez that Obamacare is gonna cost millions of people their jobs!" ISN'T ONE OF THEM, because the CBO report said something completely different!

If we aren't yet living in a total idiocracy, then the naysayers really should approach their attacks from a different angle.

If they can't think of anything better, then maybe they should go back to "Duuhhhh.....We can't have people buying their own insurance on these exchanges, cuz dat's Socialism....an' we gonna have Deff Panels 'n' stuff....duuuhhhh....people need ta depend on their bosses fur health insurance, cuz....duuuhhh.....dat's Capitalism!"



simon_says
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 20 Jan 2011
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,075

06 Feb 2014, 11:56 am

ArrantPariah wrote:
While many legitimate bases for attacking the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act may exist, the assertion "Duuuhhhh.....the CBO sez that Obamacare is gonna cost millions of people their jobs!" ISN'T ONE OF THEM, because the CBO report said something completely different!

If we aren't yet living in a total idiocracy, then the naysayers really should approach their attacks from a different angle.

If they can't think of anything better, then maybe they should go back to "Duuhhhh.....We can't have people buying their own insurance on these exchanges, cuz dat's Socialism....an' we gonna have Deff Panels 'n' stuff....duuuhhhh....people need ta depend on their bosses fur health insurance, cuz....duuuhhh.....dat's Capitalism!"


That many PPACA critics are deeply ignorant and pathological liars isn't news at this point. It's like talking to a creationist. There is literally no one home upstairs.



Jacoby
Veteran
Veteran

Joined: 10 Dec 2007
Age: 33
Gender: Male
Posts: 14,284
Location: Permanently banned by power tripping mods lol this forum is trash

06 Feb 2014, 12:32 pm

The pathological liars are the ones literally trying to spin a welfare trap into a positive. 2.5 million people will drop out of the labor force because they would lose their subsidies otherwise, this isn't a choice they are being forced out of work or else they couldn't afford health insurance that they are legally mandated to buy. Wasting and destroying lives, this will create just another barrier to those trying to climb to social ladder and that is by design.