Hopper wrote:
I think there desperately needs to be new ideas around work, ultimately resulting in more people doing less work. Some jobs probably can't be shared all that easily. An awful lot of them can. For this to, uh, work, there needs to be a better distribution of wealth.
I believe this is an idealistic view, kind of Utopian but flawed nonetheless. I have absolutely nothing against more people working, getting decent jobs, perhaps even spearheading many nations out of mass poverty. The issue arises with distribution of wealth. Some people are greedy, have a monopoly over many, but there are others who work genuinely hard to get where they are. This kind of society would likely undermine the hard workers and upraise those who are less qualified, less hard working, and generally damage the economy. Don't take my word for it, since I know practically nothing on economy, but that's the way I see it anyway. Either way, I like your idea, just don't think it can work practically is all.
Hopper wrote:
I think a 'work ethic' makes little sense in an age of increasing mechanisation, and speaks more to a sort of politically useful masochism than anything worthy.
Agreed, but I think that work ethics are still very much necessary. I have a friend who would only seek out work if her occupation had a decent ethical standard. Regardless, it's true that business and work in general has effectively become a corporate machine, with workers as the cogs and CEO's as the operators (I'm so pretentious
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
).
Hopper wrote:
I worry that the economy in general, and the stock market in particular, runs on the same principle that leads to the idea that planes only stay in the air due to collective belief/will from the passengers, or indeed, 'I DO believe in fairies! I DO believe in fairies!', but that when it all goes belly up, there are very real material consequences.
This one made me giggle, because it's so true. Only who has to pay for those consequences? Not the banks, or the corporations.
Hopper wrote:
I believe in a much stronger state in terms of social provision; that the market fails people, rather than people fail the market.
I don't agree. Personally, I think the free market is one of the only decent ideals in modern day society. It's human corruption that has damaged the market, but freedom is not inherently a bad thing. Most people just make it that way.
Hopper wrote:
I am against the praising of the military, and of recent moves to brand them 'heroes'.
I can't say I have any reasons to strictly point any fingers towards the military, but I'm aware that they have committed some vile acts in the past. Frankly, very much like the free market, it's another corrupt system that we have become dependent upon.
_________________
Such is life, that expressing yourself and the truth has you berated.