'Matter is designed' argument for GOD...

Post Reply New Topic

1. Not

2. Of course it doesn't

Einstein's observation breaks down in two critical ways, from my perspective. First, it doesn't necessarily account for any kind of "natural selection" in the formation of hadrons. When the early universe cooled sufficiently, and quarks came together to form hadrons, some were stable, some were not. Some were only stable in certain situations (for example free neutrons versus neutrons bound in nuclei). The order that we observe is just as likely to be a product of the fundamental properties of the standard model particles wild randomness may have produced countless many other fundamental and composite particles which simply fell away as they decayed.un

Second, his observation is based on the universe as he understood it and observed it at the time. We can't really draw many conclusions until we can complete the analytical model. Which raises a fundamental question about how you can understand the universe if you can't observe dark matter and dark energy.

I thought of this video.

"If it don't apply let it fly".

Above quote was heard behind the walls in a maximum security state prison.

There are many kinds of prisons.
Dependence on God opened a wonderful world and attitude if gratitude, service and ...
Above 2 sentences are observations by me.