The merits of being a victim
Kraichgauer
Veteran
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9448b/9448bad1a14a481e19228f10f77575947453353d" alt="User avatar"
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,743
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
I think the victim card players rely heavily on duping bleeding heart liberals. The only question is who's/what's next? Because there's still room on the bandwagon.
Everyone from Nixon, to Reagan, to Trump and company certainly weren't bleeding heart liberals when they took advantage of complaints by whites who resented having to share equality with non-whites, and so claimed to be victims.
Excluding of course white females, white lgbt, white liberals and so on until it's narrowed down to white conservative males. My dad had to attend some madatory workplace lecture and that's what was confirmed. White male conservative equals victimizer and everyone else equals victim.
And yet it's ridiculous for white male conservatives to think anyone bears them any ill will or wants to eliminate them.
Meanwhile the types of deverse victim cards keeps expanding. I think the kind of people you as a person of your generation wouldn't want incuded on the liberal protection bandwagon, are going to end up on it soon enough. But hey that's progress.
That's the whole thing, though. Those white conservatives who believe someone else has it out for them in reality don't want to share equality with out groups, as those said white conservatives have convinced themselves that allowing others equal status will only diminish their's.
What I'm talking about is leftist swj whatever determination that if you're a white male, who's not a liberal, you are a victimizer, you're a fascist, your kind needs to go.
Meanwhile the left continues inviting more and more victim card players onto their bandwagon.
So who/what is next?
Of course not every white male conservative is a fascistic abuser; but those who are scream the most about the victim card. That is, till they decide to play the victim themselves, and claim the most discriminated against group are conservative white males.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
Kraichgauer wrote:
EzraS wrote:
I think the victim card players rely heavily on duping bleeding heart liberals. The only question is who's/what's next? Because there's still room on the bandwagon.
Everyone from Nixon, to Reagan, to Trump and company certainly weren't bleeding heart liberals when they took advantage of complaints by whites who resented having to share equality with non-whites, and so claimed to be victims.
Excluding of course white females, white lgbt, white liberals and so on until it's narrowed down to white conservative males. My dad had to attend some madatory workplace lecture and that's what was confirmed. White male conservative equals victimizer and everyone else equals victim.
And yet it's ridiculous for white male conservatives to think anyone bears them any ill will or wants to eliminate them.
Meanwhile the types of deverse victim cards keeps expanding. I think the kind of people you as a person of your generation wouldn't want incuded on the liberal protection bandwagon, are going to end up on it soon enough. But hey that's progress.
That's the whole thing, though. Those white conservatives who believe someone else has it out for them in reality don't want to share equality with out groups, as those said white conservatives have convinced themselves that allowing others equal status will only diminish their's.
What I'm talking about is leftist swj whatever determination that if you're a white male, who's not a liberal, you are a victimizer, you're a fascist, your kind needs to go.
Meanwhile the left continues inviting more and more victim card players onto their bandwagon.
So who/what is next?
Of course not every white male conservative is a fascistic abuser; but those who are scream the most about the victim card. That is, till they decide to play the victim themselves, and claim the most discriminated against group are conservative white males.
But aren't they the the most discriminated against group by the left?
EzraS wrote:
But aren't they the the most discriminated against group by the left?
Taking this simple idea that you just stated, I think I can rephrase my original question:
Why has divergence of opinions and perspectives practically become a cultural crime? Why do people today feel threatened by the simple fact that someone else has different thoughts?
Why does it seem like people feel like they can only be right when someone else is wrong? Or, even further, why do so many people even interpret "someone else being wrong" as completely equivalent to "themselves being right"?
_________________
and my fake laugh would suddenly sound sincere