ZETATHON wrote:
Twilightprincess wrote:
In my family, the stereotype is that boys are concrete thinkers and girls are more abstract
Interesting. It's useful to define terms explicitly. What do you mean by concrete vs abstract?
To give an example of what I meant by abstract, from being a kid, I would always find some mechanism or physical process interesting. My mind will "abstract" the key elements and I would be fascinated by the idea of taking that abstraction and applying it to some other context. In the past, human relationships and feelings, were simply a black box to me.
I would also call philosophy "abstract", and it would be true to say that philosophers are typically male (not all - Ayn Rand would be a female example).
My girlfriend on the otherhand can meticulously quote my words back at me from conversations we had months ago. Whereas my brain simply does not have mental machinery to remember such things verbotim, but hers does.
I love philosophy and abstract, philosophical concepts from literature. I also like abstract forms of mathematics but can’t stand the boredom that, to me, is geometry.
My mind is often up in the clouds instead of thinking about practical, everyday things. I tend to be a bit impractical for this reason.
I’ll get caught up in something someone says and will be swept away on what that specific thing says about our society as a whole. It’s really hard to describe this actually.
Having more male than female philosophers might have less to do with biology and more to do with education (as far as early philosophers are concerned) and socialization. It’s a boys’ club.