Is it ok to be a nationalist on Wrong Planet?

Page 3 of 3 [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,854
Location: London

12 Aug 2019, 3:27 pm

Is it OK to be a nationalist - yes. Most of our users are nationalists, they support the existence of nation states.

Is it OK to be an ethnic nationalist - no. Ethnic nationalist is a form of racism, which is against WrongPlanet's rules. If a view would get you kicked off Twitter, a platform with very little moderation, then it is not acceptable here.

That includes, but is not limited to:

- Advocating for racial homogeneity.
- Claiming that the racial composition of a society is important (it is obviously fine to consider it if you have to diagnose sickle cell anaemia, but that is obviously irrelevant to most people's day to day lives)
- Objecting to the exhibition of interracial relationships in the media.
- Holocaust denial apologia
- Accusing black people of idolising gang members en masse
- Justifying racial prejudice ("it would be foolish of me not to make initial assumptions based on race")
- Opposition to multiculturalism
- Suggesting that natural immigration is "enforced"

Context will, of course, be considered where appropriate; users who can make a well-evidenced and fact-based argument about some of the "milder" items on the list will usually be allowed to, if they stay clear of full-on bigotry. On the other hand, users who cram all of these things into one thread may attract close mod attention, including warnings and eventually bans.

Users are advised to familiarise themselves with WrongPlanet's rules before posting.



Acteon25
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 9 Aug 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 44
Location: UK

12 Aug 2019, 3:31 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Is it OK to be a nationalist - yes. Most of our users are nationalists, they support the existence of nation states.

Is it OK to be an ethnic nationalist - no. Ethnic nationalist is a form of racism, which is against WrongPlanet's rules. If a view would get you kicked off Twitter, a platform with very little moderation, then it is not acceptable here.

That includes, but is not limited to:

- Advocating for racial homogeneity.
- Claiming that the racial composition of a society is important (it is obviously fine to consider it if you have to diagnose sickle cell anaemia, but that is obviously irrelevant to most people's day to day lives)
- Objecting to the exhibition of interracial relationships in the media.
- Holocaust denial apologia
- Accusing black people of idolising gang members en masse
- Justifying racial prejudice ("it would be foolish of me not to make initial assumptions based on race")
- Opposition to multiculturalism
- Suggesting that natural immigration is "enforced"

Context will, of course, be considered where appropriate; users who can make a well-evidenced and fact-based argument about some of the "milder" items on the list will usually be allowed to, if they stay clear of full-on bigotry. On the other hand, users who cram all of these things into one thread may attract close mod attention, including warnings and eventually bans.

Users are advised to familiarise themselves with WrongPlanet's rules before posting.


If you bothered to read my first posts, it clearly says “I am not an ethno-nationalist”.

Besides ethno-nationalism doesn’t necessarily mean racism, that’s your own opinion. As a moderator you are advised to READ the posts before locking them. :roll:



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,854
Location: London

12 Aug 2019, 3:40 pm

Acteon25 wrote:
If you bothered to read my first posts, it clearly says “I am not an ethno-nationalist”.

And yet you also said:
Acteon25 wrote:
I also believe at least 70% of the population of all countries should be made-up of the original people who formed the nation.

I think the modern definition of nationality is meaningless e.g. a person born to English parents in Japan is not “Japanese” they are English. I do not hate anyone for their race, but I believe homogeneous societies are safer and fairer.

For the purposes of moderation, I don't care whether you identify as an ethno-nationalist. I care whether you say ethno-nationalist things. I'm not dealing with platonic ideals, I have no way of telling what you're like in real life, I'm dealing with the things people say on here.

Frankly saying you're not an ethno-nationalist while simultaneously advocating for ethnic purity is reminiscent of ""I am not Count Olaf" said Count Olaf".



slam_thunderhide
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 5 Dec 2014
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 334

12 Aug 2019, 3:47 pm

madbutnotmad wrote:

From what i understand this website is primarily designed to serve as a community for people with Autism Spectrum Disorder which includes people with Asperger Syndrome and is not a political debating forum, although their is an area where politics can be discussed among the members. I imagine if you are there to be respectful and decent.
Then no problem.


In practice, that might have been something like how it used to work around here, but not anymore. I've seen several people get their threads locked purely for the opinions they expressed regardless of how politely and respectfully they conducted themselves. Sometimes I think it would be better to do away with the pretense of having a politics sub-forum altogether.



Acteon25
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 9 Aug 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 44
Location: UK

12 Aug 2019, 3:59 pm

The_Walrus wrote:
Acteon25 wrote:
If you bothered to read my first posts, it clearly says “I am not an ethno-nationalist”.

And yet you also said:
Acteon25 wrote:
I also believe at least 70% of the population of all countries should be made-up of the original people who formed the nation.

I think the modern definition of nationality is meaningless e.g. a person born to English parents in Japan is not “Japanese” they are English. I do not hate anyone for their race, but I believe homogeneous societies are safer and fairer.

For the purposes of moderation, I don't care whether you identify as an ethno-nationalist. I care whether you say ethno-nationalist things. I'm not dealing with platonic ideals, I have no way of telling what you're like in real life, I'm dealing with the things people say on here.

Frankly saying you're not an ethno-nationalist while simultaneously advocating for ethnic purity is reminiscent of ""I am not Count Olaf" said Count Olaf".


Ethno-nationalists believe in a 100% native racial population. At least know you’re talking about! I don’t need some jumped up Walrus acting holier than thou. Nothing I’ve said is offensive to normal, decent people. I don’t care how you feel.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,854
Location: London

12 Aug 2019, 4:03 pm

slam_thunderhide wrote:
Acteon25 wrote:
I’m a national socialist but not a Nazi. I support strong borders and decentralised government (anti-EU). I also believe at least 70% of the population of all countries should be made-up of the original people who formed the nation.

I think the modern definition of nationality is meaningless e.g. a person born to English parents in Japan is not “Japanese” they are English. I do not hate anyone for their race, but I believe homogeneous societies are safer and fairer.

These are my opinions. I always try to see both sides of every story. I am willing to be wrong in an argument and to learn from others. These views got me kicked off Twitter and constantly abused by so-called “liberals”. I have lost good friends for being a “racist” even though I am not anything of the sort.


A browse through the wrongplanet PPR forum archives reveals that members used to be far freer to discuss such things only a few years ago than they are now. This forum used to feature nationalists, trotskyites, libertarians, you name it. Now it seems to be mostly just a neoliberal echo-chamber.

See if anything there are fewer neoliberals than ever around here. They haven't declined quite as much as vanilla social conservatives but they've gone from being one of the dominant groups to hugely outnumbered.

There are libertarians but they aren't as dominant as they used to be.

I can only ever really remember one communist of any stripe being active, and he's still active.

There are many nationalists including ethnic nationalists. They have naturally learned not to express their more racist views (racism has always been against WrongPlanet rules and would always quickly result in a ban) but users like Mikah and Darmok post here relative unperturbed in much the same way that Tequila did (Tequila, incidentally, is not banned).

There are Assadists here. There are pro-lifers. There are civic nationalists.

It's possible we come down a bit quicker on homophobia (although AngelRho will probably tell you that Tallyman and Cornflake always came down on him too quickly for his liking) and we're certainly much better on transphobia.

These days I'd say the dominant groups are:
- vanilla social democrats
- alt-lite
- militant pacifists

It's true that there aren't as many "interesting characters" as there used to be, but PPR has gone from a place dominated by four fairly mild large groups (vanilla socdem, vanilla soccon, neoliberal, libertarian) with lots of eccentrics, to one dominated by three groups with three of the old dominant groups now being the eccentrics.



Acteon25
Tufted Titmouse
Tufted Titmouse

Joined: 9 Aug 2019
Gender: Male
Posts: 44
Location: UK

12 Aug 2019, 4:08 pm

Roboto wrote:
kraftiekortie wrote:
it's not really a "racist" statement---true....it's a nationalist statement. It's a "one ethnic group beats all the other ethnic groups" statement.

By itself, it doesn't seem too bad-----but this sort of thing has been appropriated by people who believe in "ethnic cleansing."

Not only white Nazis. Black Tutsi, too, from Rwanda and Burundi.


I don't see where there is "beating" or winning or any favoritism implied in his statements.
I'm really into pure bred dogs and think they should be preserved, does that make me canine racist?
We're all just mammals randomly here.


Thank you. They’re ganging up on me reporting me and accusing me of racism. I have a warning on my account. I came onto this site because I was depressed and seeking help. I got it from good individuals like yourself. I thought this was an inclusive website but now I want to leave.



The_Walrus
Forum Moderator
Forum Moderator

User avatar

Joined: 27 Jan 2010
Age: 29
Gender: Male
Posts: 8,854
Location: London

12 Aug 2019, 4:15 pm

I privately asked the OP to tell me his definition of racism. He responded by linking to a website that describes itself as "pro-European", and particularly an article on that site claiming that "racism" is a Trotskyist plot to silence white people.

Consequently, particularly given his attitude towards gentle moderation activities undertaken by myself and another moderator, I do not see any realistic prospect of him adjusting the content of his posts to obey WrongPlanet rules. I am going to lock this thread.

Anyone who wishes to discuss the meta-aspects of this thread may, of course, do so in WrongPlanet.net discussion, or in a dedicated thread. I'm sorry for raising them and then shutting down the discussion.

Anyone who is concerned about our handling of this situation is free to contact me in a PM, or post in WrongPlanet.net discussion, whichever they feel more comfortable with. I went out of my way to try and get Acteon to post within the forum rules but he was not willing to.