TheRevengeofTW1ZTY wrote:
Another funny thing about Americans, at least in my opinion, is that they always seem to wait a few years until after they've destroyed their enemies in war to decide exactly why their enemies were 'evil' and deserved it.
When the American Civil War was first fought not that many people really cared about slavery or the rights of black people until the war was almost over. Originally they thought they were doing it just to preserve that precious Union of ours, but I guess the evils of slavery in the south had a better ring to it when it came to justifying Sherman's March to The Sea.
And in World War 2 we pride ourselves on helping to stop the Nazis from killing the Jews during the holocaust, and yet many Americans during the time of World War 2 were actually very racist and anti-semitic and were against allowing Jewish immigrants fleeing from Europe to live in their country.
Anti-Semitism was by no means just an American thing. It was prevalent throughout the entire stretch of Europe. It was a huge problem in predominantly Christian countries and continues to be so to a certain extent. People seem to have a really hard time understanding and interacting with those who have different belief systems (no matter how similar such belief systems might be...). It’s a human trait stemming from tribalism. If chimps were intelligent enough to have religion, they’d have battles over it, too. As it is, they must content themselves with tribal fights over territory.
Despite having some degree of anti-Semitism, participating in WWII was still noteworthy and extremely important. Families should be proud of relatives who fought in that war because it was the right thing to do.
Racism wasn’t and isn’t limited to America, either.
Even people who were anti-slavery tended to have some degree of prejudice. Does this make them bad people? No because we need to keep in mind that people did not have our current scientific, psychological, or sociological knowledge. They couldn’t help but be misinformed. If we lived back then, we’d probably be prejudiced, too.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin was an important anti-slavery work, but sections of it are absolutely cringeworthy to read now. It doesn’t make Stowe’s work (or Lincoln’s for that matter) any less valuable or important. It was a step in the right direction. Things aren’t always entirely good or entirely bad. Let’s have some balance here. Any progress is worthy of note and recognition because it’s gradually moving us towards a more welcoming society. We’ve come a long way as far as civil rights, gay rights, and women’s rights go. We’re currently navigating our way through complex gender issues.
Interestingly, when Lincoln met Stowe, he supposedly said: “So you are the little woman who wrote the book that started this Great War.”
I think the key is to keep in mind where an individual is located in history before judging them too harshly. Hopefully, future Americans (and Earthlings in general) will consider our contextual vantage point in a similar manner.
_________________
Love dares you to care for
The people on the edge of the night
Last edited by TwilightPrincess on 15 Dec 2019, 9:25 am, edited 3 times in total.