txfz1 wrote:
It goes well with the “all humans are liars” paradox. Circular logic as if the sentence is false then it would be contradiction and true. The aspie in me breaks down the sentence structure and the noun is a thing and does not have a conveyance of truth as a word but does when used as reference. When used as a noun for law it makes the paradox even more fun, as it put the onus on the word false, can a term of punishment be false? Unjust or inhumane? Context come into play as a noun for law. When used aa a noun for music, it seems to lose the logic unless you apply falsetto to the adjective.
Kurt Gödel made a substantial amount of work on this one, using purely math to "solve" it.
It's known as Gödels Incompleteness Theorem.
It turns out, using math, that you can predict there will always be certain statements that are true, but which you can never prove. They are undecidable.
This behavior shows up in physics as well.
It makes the spectral gap for electrons unsolvable.
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2015.18983Quote:
For a finite chunk of 2D lattice, however, the computation always ends in a finite time, leading to a definite answer. At first sight, therefore, the result would seem to have little relation to the real world. Real materials are always finite, and their properties can be measured experimentally or simulated by computer.
But the undecidability ‘at infinity’ means that even if the spectral gap is known for a certain finite-size lattice, it could change abruptly — from gapless to gapped or vice versa — when the size increases, even by just a single extra atom. And because it is “provably impossible” to predict when — or if — it will do so, Cubitt says, it will be difficult to draw general conclusions from experiments or simulations.