Controversy over Jewish-Israili actress playing Virgin Mary
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,849
Location: Long Island, New York
Social media outrage after Israeli Jew cast as Jesus’ mother in Netflix biblical epic
Mary, directed by DJ Caruso, will star 21-year-old Noa Cohenin the starring role, alongside 22-year-old Israeli actor Ido Tako as Joseph, and is set to be released on December 6.
The release of the trailer on social media on Tuesday sparked a storm among users on X/Twitter, who immediately criticised the film for its casting of Cohen as the Virgin Mary, who some claim should be depicted by an actress of Palestinian descent.
The cast contains many other Israeli actors, including Ori Pfeffer, Mili Avital, Keren Tzur and Hilla Vidor, and features British film and theatre veteran Anthony Hopkins as King Herrod.
“Half the cast is Israeli, including Noa Cohen who plays Mary. Looks like s**t anyway, but needless to say avoid this like the plague,” tweeted one account, joining the call to boycott the film.
Antisemitic comments followed the trailer, with one account tweeting: “This is a joke and a slap in the face to all Christians. How dare you let that disgusting jew play Mary.”
Another account described the casting of Cohen in the titular role as blasphemous.
“There is something deeply blasphemous about casting an Israeli to play the role of Mary, the mother of Jesus, while Israel is carrying out a genocide against Palestinians, killing some of the oldest Christian populations in the area and destroying their heritage sites.”
Meanwhile, a different social media user took issue with the film because the titular roles would be played by “white Europeans”.
The director, Caruso, described his film to Entertainment Weekly as a “coming of age” story following a “smart, strong-willed young woman facing monumental challenges: overcoming social stigma, evading a jealous king and bearing the weight of a world-changing destiny”.
Explaining his decision to cast Israeli actors in the lead roles, he said it was “important to us that Mary, along with most of our primary cast, be selected from Israel to ensure authenticity”.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Unfortunately, it appears that reasonable objections to the casting of this show have gotten mixed up with anti-Jewish bigotry (e.g. "that disgusting jew").
Here are my own thoughts. Given the director's stated desire to "ensure authenticity":
DNA tests have shown that most Jews and most Palestinians, especially Palestinian Christians, are very closely related. This is consistent with the known history of Palestine, that most Palestinian Christians are descended from ancient Jews who converted to Christianity. In other words, most Jews and most Palestinian Christians are of the same "race."
So, from a purely physical point of view, Palestinian Christians and Israeli Jews would be equally authentic representations of the Virgin Mary and her husband Joseph.
Culturally, though, I'm inclined to agree with the protesters that Palestinian Christians would be a better choice, not only for reasons of cultural heritage, but also because of the shared experience of living under occupation. Mary and Joseph lived under Roman occupation, and there are many aspects of their story, as told in the Gospels, that today's Palestinian Christians can relate to from personal experience.
Also the relevant ancient towns/cities, Bethlehem and Nazareth, are Palestinian cities today. Bethlehem today is a Palestinian enclave in the West Bank. Nazareth is in Israel, but many of its residents are Palestinian/Arab citizens of Israel. (Nazareth was one of the few places in Israel where the Palestinians were not expelled, apparently because the relevant Israeli commander decided that expelling a big bunch of Palestinian Christians out of Nazareth -- the town where Jesus grew up -- would risk getting too much bad press in the West.)
EDIT: Culturally, one could also make the contrary argument, that Mary and Joseph, as Jews, were religiously more similar to today's Jews than to Christians. However, although Mary and Joseph obviously weren't Christians, their religion wasn't modern Judaism either. The Talmud had not yet been put together, and Christianity inherited some aspects of Second Temple Era Judaism (e.g. the idea of Satan as the enemy of God, rather than just the heavenly prosecuting attorney) that were subsequently rejected by rabbinic Judaism.
Be that as it may, it is no surprise to me that Palestinian Christians would be outraged by the casting of Israeli Jews (i.e. first-class citizens of the nation currently oppressing Palestinians) as Mary and Joseph. Palestinian Christians see themselves as the direct descendants of the world's first Christians. They see Christianity as their own ancestors' gift to the world -- and they are quite disappointed, to say the least, by all too many Christians' ingratitude for this gift, and by all too many Christians' tendency to shower favors on Israeli Jews instead.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
Last edited by Mona Pereth on 15 Nov 2024, 1:43 am, edited 3 times in total.
Was their any similar controversy over Yvonne Elliman playing Mary Magdalen?
Probably not, but that was back in the 1970's, when authenticity of representation was not as common a concern as it is now.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,431
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The much greater tragedy, of course, is the current everyday, real-life treatment of the descendants of Jesus's original followers in the land where Jesus was born.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
Kraichgauer
Veteran
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Gender: Male
Posts: 48,431
Location: Spokane area, Washington state.
The much greater tragedy, of course, is the current everyday, real-life treatment of the descendants of Jesus's original followers in the land where Jesus was born.
To be sure that is true. Both Palestinians and Jews can lay claim to being descendants of the Israelites, and for that reason extremists on both sides believe that justifies committing acts of violence against one another. Everyday people who only want to live in peace are caught in the middle.
For what it's worth, both the Germans and French can claim descent from the ancient Franks, and after centuries of murdering one another are finally peaceful neighbors. But maybe that's too much to hope for in the Middle East.
_________________
-Bill, otherwise known as Kraichgauer
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,849
Location: Long Island, New York
Here are my own thoughts. Given the director's stated desire to "ensure authenticity":
DNA tests have shown that most Jews and most Palestinians, especially Palestinian Christians, are very closely related. This is consistent with the known history of Palestine, that most Palestinian Christians are descended from ancient Jews who converted to Christianity. In other words, most Jews and most Palestinian Christians are of the same "race."
So, from a purely physical point of view, Palestinian Christians and Israeli Jews would be equally authentic representations of the Virgin Mary and her husband Joseph.
Culturally, though, I'm inclined to agree with the protesters that Palestinian Christians would be a better choice, not only for reasons of cultural heritage, but also because of the shared experience of living under occupation. Mary and Joseph lived under Roman occupation, and there are many aspects of their story, as told in the Gospels, that today's Palestinian Christians can relate to from personal experience.
Also the relevant ancient towns/cities, Bethlehem and Nazareth, are Palestinian cities today. Bethlehem today is a Palestinian enclave in the West Bank. Nazareth is in Israel, but many of its residents are Palestinian/Arab citizens of Israel. (Nazareth was one of the few places in Israel where the Palestinians were not expelled, apparently because the relevant Israeli commander decided that expelling a big bunch of Palestinian Christians out of Nazareth -- the town where Jesus grew up -- would risk getting too much bad press in the West.)
EDIT: Culturally, one could also make the contrary argument, that Mary and Joseph, as Jews, were religiously more similar to today's Jews than to Christians. However, although Mary and Joseph obviously weren't Christians, their religion wasn't modern Judaism either. The Talmud had not yet been put together, and Christianity inherited some aspects of Second Temple Era Judaism (e.g. the idea of Satan as the enemy of God, rather than just the heavenly prosecuting attorney) that were subsequently rejected by rabbinic Judaism.
Be that as it may, it is no surprise to me that Palestinian Christians would be outraged by the casting of Israeli Jews (i.e. first-class citizens of the nation currently oppressing Palestinians) as Mary and Joseph. Palestinian Christians see themselves as the direct descendants of the world's first Christians. They see Christianity as their own ancestors' gift to the world -- and they are quite disappointed, to say the least, by all too many Christians' ingratitude for this gift, and by all too many Christians' tendency to shower favors on Israeli Jews instead.
I did not comment because my knowledge of the Virgin Mary is limited. Before reading the article I assumed it was about American identity politics, a fundamentalist Christian version of right-wing cancel culture and that is what piqued my interest. Besides antisemitism bleeding in American-style identity politics did bleed in with the objection to "European" actors. Correct me if I am wrong as my knowledge is limited 1. As far as I know, none of the actors are immigrants from Europe 2. While the Jewish religion was quite different as was everything else two centuries ago it would seem likely that the Virgin Mary would identify as Jewish if people identified members of groups then because that was the dominant religion in that time and place and Palestinian Nationalism was 1900 years in the future.
If the depictions are inauthentic is more likely it will be because it is a 2024 film trying to depict events around the year zero, rather than the actors religion or race. All we have is the trailer. Until the movie comes out and historians can vet it all we have is our priors.
The trailer
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Jesus was Jewish. His mother was Jewish. All twelve apostles were Jewish. His mother’s cousin, Elizabeth was married to a rabbi named Zechariah.
All four of his grandparents were Jewish. His adoptive father was Jewish.
Maia Morgenstern was a Jewish actress who played Jesus’ mother.
Christians and Jewish people have a history permanently connected and interwoven.
Perhaps people will consider this a way to look for the similarities, and connections. Love is an option.
_________________
ADHD-I(diagnosed) ASD-HF(diagnosed)
RDOS scores - Aspie score 131/200 - neurotypical score 69/200 - very likely Aspie
It isn't. Most American fundamentalist Christians, as far as I can tell, are not even aware of the existence of Palestinian Christians, much less the historical fact that most Palestinian Christians are descended from ancient Jews/Israelites, likely including some of the original Jewish followers of Jesus.
The commenters are most likely either Palestinian Christians or other non-U.S.A. Christians who are aware of the existence of Palestinian Christians.
Dunno if they are immigrants from Europe (some though not most Israelis, currently, are immigrants from Europe), but they are Israelis, and Israel was founded by white European Jews.
Of course, even most Ashkenazi Jews are more closely related, genetically, to most Palestinians than to most non-Jewish white Europeans. However, one of the ways that Zionism was historically "sold," first to British government and then subsequently to the U.S. government, was that Israel would be a reliable ally, first of British imperialism and subsequently of American domination. Thus, Israel is seen, by most people in the Middle East, as a de facto Western (first European, now American) colonial project.
I assume you meant to say two millennia ago?
That is correct, although "Palestine" was already one of the longstanding names of the region. See Wikipedia article on Palestine (region):
As noted above, "Palestine," as one of the names of the region, is actually much older.
And, while what we know today as "Palestinian nationalism" is only one century old, most Palestinians do have ancestors who have lived there for millennia.
That is true (except for the technical quibble that there was no year zero.).
Nevertheless, the story being portrayed is the foundational story of Christianity, not of Judaism. So, from a cultural heritage point of view, the most appropriate actors would be Palestinian Christians.
(On the other hand, hopefully the next Moses movie will cast Moses as a Jew, and preferably a Levite. By today's standards, Charlton Heston was inappropriate casting of Moses. While Moses is an important figure in Christianity as well as Judaism, he is nowhere nearly as important in Christianity as he is in Judaism.)
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,849
Location: Long Island, New York
It isn't. Most American fundamentalist Christians, as far as I can tell, are not even aware of the existence of Palestinian Christians, much less the historical fact that most Palestinian Christians are descended from ancient Jews/Israelites, likely including some of the original Jewish followers of Jesus.
The commenters are most likely either Palestinian Christians or other non-U.S.A. Christians who are aware of the existence of Palestinian Christians.
Dunno if they are immigrants from Europe (some though not most Israelis, currently, are immigrants from Europe), but they are Israelis, and Israel was founded by white European Jews.
Of course, even most Ashkenazi Jews are more closely related, genetically, to most Palestinians than to most non-Jewish white Europeans. However, one of the ways that Zionism was historically "sold," first to British government and then subsequently to the U.S. government, was that Israel would be a reliable ally, first of British imperialism and subsequently of American domination. Thus, Israel is seen, by most people in the Middle East, as a de facto Western (first European, now American) colonial project.
I assume you meant to say two millennia ago?
That is correct, although "Palestine" was already the Roman name of the province.
"Palestine," as one of the names of the region, is actually much older. See Wikipedia article on Palestine (region):
And, while what we know today as "Palestinian nationalism" is only one century old, most Palestinians do have ancestors who have lived there for millennia.
That is true (except for the technical quibble that there was no year zero.).
Nevertheless, the story being portrayed is the foundational story of Christianity, not of Judaism. So, from a cultural heritage point of view, the most appropriate actors would be Palestinian Christians.
(On the other hand, hopefully the next Moses movie will cast Moses as a Jew, and preferably a Levite. By today's standards, Charlton Heston was inappropriate casting of Moses. While Moses is an important figure in Christianity as well as Judaism, he is nowhere nearly as important in Christianity as he is in Judaism.)
Yes I meant two millennia. I did not think I needed to spell out exactly why my original assumption about who was complaining about the casting was wrong because because it was obviously not coming from the same people who were complaining about the “war on Christmas” a few years back.
Well if Charlton Heston’s portrayal of Moses is inappropriate by todays standards because he is a Gentile, nobody has told the Jews about this. It will be up to Christians to decide the appropriateness of Mary.
Often it seems the most bitter, intractable disputes are between family members. I wonder if somehow this is a factor in how intractable this conflict has been
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
I have to wonder if any of the people bagging on the Israelis are Israeli citizens, Jews, or even Jew-ish; or if they are just armchair philosophers throwing shadows and strawmen at each other until one of them stops posting.
Well?
_________________
The movie The Ten Commandments was made back in the 1950's, when criticism on the basis of casting was unheard-of. I do suspect that such a criticism might be voiced if the movie were made today -- do you think it wouldn't be? In any case, back in the 1950's, it seems that the main Jewish reaction was relief at how much better this movie was than an earlier silent version that had been made back in the 1920's. (See How DeMille made his ‘Ten Commandments’ Jewish again, Forward, Apr 8, 2020.)
Anyhow, my main point here was to respond to the following remark by the director of the Mary movie:
It seems to me that his point here would be valid if he were doing a re-make of The Ten Commandments. In such a movie, if he were casting on the basis of the actors' ethnicity, then casting a Jew as Moses would clearly be the most appropriate.
But the ethnicity-based issues are more complex with the casting of Mary, and I can certainly understand why Palestinian Christians, and other Christians sympathetic to Palestinians, would be outraged by his choice.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
Last edited by Mona Pereth on 15 Nov 2024, 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ASPartOfMe
Veteran
Joined: 25 Aug 2013
Age: 67
Gender: Male
Posts: 35,849
Location: Long Island, New York
Googling, I do find some Jewish criticism of Charlton Heston’s portrayal of Moses, though not on that particular basis. (See articles here and here.)
The movie The Ten Commandments was made back in the 1950's, when criticism on the basis of casting was unheard-of. I do suspect that such a criticism might be voiced if the movie were made today -- do you think it wouldn't be? In any case, back in the 1950's, the main Jewish reaction seems to have been relief at how much better this movie was than an earlier silent version that had been made back in the 1920's. (See How DeMille made his ‘Ten Commandments’ Jewish again, Forward, Apr 8, 2020.)
Anyhow, my main point here was to respond to the following remark by the director of the Mary movie:
It seems to me that his point here would be valid if he were doing a re-make of The Ten Commandments. In such a movie, if he were casting on the basis of the actors' ethnicity, casting a Jew as Moses would clearly be the most appropriate.
But the ethnicity-based issues are more complex with the casting of Mary, and I can certainly understand why Palestinian Christians, and other Christians sympathetic to Palestinians, would be outraged by his choice.
The Ten Commandments would be criticized for its casting today because nearly every movie is. I don't know about going back to the 50s but going back somewhat so people's automatic reflex is not to look for offense would be a good idea. It is great when Autistic actors play autistics but my favorite movie depiction is by the NT actress Dakota Fanning in Please Stand By.
We don't know the background of these critics, the article does not say. We have to wait and see if Palestinian Christians actually get outraged.
_________________
Professionally Identified and joined WP August 26, 2013
DSM 5: Autism Spectrum Disorder, DSM IV: Aspergers Moderate Severity
“My autism is not a superpower. It also isn’t some kind of god-forsaken, endless fountain of suffering inflicted on my family. It’s just part of who I am as a person”. - Sara Luterman
Found some other recent news stories about this controversy:
- Controversy surrounds ‘Mary’ Netflix film with criticism of Palestinian 'erasure', The New Arab, 15 November, 2024: "A new Netflix film about Mary, mother of Jesus, has cast Israeli actors while ignoring Palestinians, sparking anger and calls for a boycott."
- Mary: Netflix faces backlash for casting Israeli actors in lead roles in upcoming biblical film, Middle East Eye, 14 November 2024: "Social media users have called for a Netflix boycott, with many accusing the platform of erasing the characters' Palestinian roots with the decision to cast Israelis."
This controversy appears to be part of a larger trend of concern about Palestinian 'erasure' in Western pop culture. The Middle East Eye page has a link to a story about another similar controversy here, plus a story about another related theme here.
_________________
- Autistic in NYC - Resources and new ideas for the autistic adult community in the New York City metro area.
- Autistic peer-led groups (via text-based chat, currently) led or facilitated by members of the Autistic Peer Leadership Group.
- My Twitter / "X" (new as of 2021)
There has also been some controversy about straight actors playing gay characters, when gay actors have been playing straight characters since forever. You're just acting.
And, Biblical costume-dressup movies are usually as boring as Hell. Even when the original source material is not boring in the least. I don't think that I will bother watching this one.
_________________
May you be blessed by YHWH and his Asherah
Similar Topics | |
---|---|
Actress Teri Garr R.I.P. |
29 Oct 2024, 10:40 pm |
Christopher Columbus was secretly Jewish |
04 Nov 2024, 2:54 pm |
Lufthansa fined $4m for treatment of Jewish passengers |
16 Oct 2024, 9:52 pm |
would you let your autistic son die a virgin? |
15 Nov 2024, 9:55 pm |