Cydonia (Mars)

Post Reply New Topic

I know a lot of you would call BS on this out of hand but, this video is a trip and this would be an incredibly boring forum if Republicans, Democrats, Christians, Muslims, and gays were all we were allowed to talk about. I'm sure some of you have heard of Richard Hoagland's rantings, this guy actually tied out all kinds of monuments on earth right back to stuff on Mars.

So, for the open-minded with time for the entertainment:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ophC-_WZq8k[/youtube]

the ancients had an extensive astrological & astronomical knowledge which they placed inside symbols.
the snake eating its tail image becomes the banded pattern of the milky way with a galactic center bulge!
his leaps of conjecture are next to intense imagery & mythology. head scratching = tyme out of mind?

Yeah. the Abury/Cydonia side-by-side showing in particular was overwheming.

Sounds like it was a Spartacus: Blood and Sand type culture.

Mars has been dead for millions of years, if it ever hosted life at all.

That gets pinched from two sides though, one that for an advanced enough culture that might not be as big of a problem as it would be for us. The other, although it may only make up perhaps tens of thousands of years; we're finding things like Gobekli Tepi now dating back 11,000 years, looking at the possibility that Derinkuyu (also in Turkey) might be just as old as well as some of the other heaviest stone monuments like what's found in Cuzco Peru. Some of the block sizes and fits just aren't making sense to us for the technology that we would have believed existed in those times, would would beg the question whether we have perhaps seen significantly more technologically advanced days prior to the last ice age (although no telling how far back) than what we believe ourselves to enjoy now.

Speaking of Gobekli, things just keep getting creepier:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdoUnTm2E28[/youtube]

There are homo sapien fossil remains over 100,000 years old. We did not come from the stars 12,000 years ago. Homo sapien has been around at least 250,000 years. He evolved from prior versions of genus homo. And all of genus homo came from Africa, not the stars.

ruveyn

Who built those pyramids on Mars?

I agree, that would be a failed interpretation.

I think this is where it likely gets considerably worse to your ears: Mars as a moon of Rahab, now the asteroid belt. Culture centered around the fallen angels. Fallen angels watching our development, we have names for them such as Zeta Reticuli for one group of several (albeit - I don't know what the implication is - whether all Zeta are fallen angels or 1/3 thereof, same for Pleiadians or Draco). Noah's flood coming because the sons of God found the the daughters of earth beautiful - ie. creation of Nephilim. Ditto for Sodom and Gomorrah.

This isn't a panspermia story, its a story of the fall, and then the fall brought to earth including mimicry of major geometry throughout megalith sites. If its not weird enough don't worry, Iapetus as a potential jail to be opened up to let out Lucifer's wrath on the Earth for the beginning of the tribulation where the men of renown (ie. Nephilim) are back, ie. the pagan demigods and gods, and to add to that they - and the 'aliens' - preaching a 'higher' spiritual truth have the help of Peter the Roman (ie. apostate pope) of setting this up as the one world religion; of course which it fits like a glove for the new age and gnostic communities. Free dispensation of the chip, 666, ensues for those beguiled by what's essentially a bucketload or rohypnols in the world's coffee, especially with a culture which has zero preparation for such a thing.

That's I think about the most concise gist of where I think these guys are going with this story - let me know if I left something out.

As absolutely bats--- as all of that might sound though, it gets frightening when you look at the numbers, and as someone who was studying new age/theosophy for a while it shows a near if not perfect fit between the two at least.

Last edited by techstepgenr8tion on 27 Dec 2012, 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

There are no constructed pyramids on Mars. The thing that looked like face turned out in a later higher resolution image just to be a rock formation. No face on Mars. No pyramid on Mars. Just red sand.

Mars is an uninhabited sh*t hole of a planet.

ruveyn

And for a special kicker: last Friday 12/21, might well have been an 'illuminated' date, ie. the Black Awakening.

True or not, this makes Dan Brown look utterly vanilla in comparison.

The "pyramid" shape is the natural resting shape of gradual structures, and is also the general shape that emerges as granular matter is worn away from mountains.

The reason the pyramid shape was adapted to the pyramid structures found around Earth is most likely because it is the most stable shape over a long period of time. Most piles of dirt assume this shape.







Once again, a simple knowledge of physics triumphs!

Your imaginary friends.

Hopefully no one's mom, otherwise we've already got Nephilim running around.

Also, the genus Homo first appears in the fossil record during the ice age, thus ruling out any advanced technology before then.

I'm willing to entertain the POSSIBILITY of humans having better technology in prehistoric times than we know about and was lost, and I am willing to entertain the POSSIBILITY that ancient humans were contacted by aliens. I am NOT ready to put blind faith in that stuff. Like many, I am curious about the possibility of life on Mars, but for now, all geographic features appear to be weather-worn and asteroid-smashed rocks!

It's only a matter of time before the kind of people that claim to see Jesus or the virgin Mary in grilled cheese sandwiches and hard water stains start making the same claims about geologic features on Mars.

Lets forget that NASA proved that it was just a rock formation.

In fact lets just forget all logic and reality for a moment and just buy into this Cydonian stuff for a moment.

Can you believers please explain one thing to me?

Why did the Martians build a mile-wide portrait of a herdy-gerdy monkey?

Your "face" on Mars has a sloping forehead, no chin, and is framed by a furry mane. Its a much better likeness of a howler monkey than of any human that I've ever seen.

So why did the martians build a vast sculpture of a non-human primate?