MSBKyle wrote:
If you think about it, none of us asked to be born. We were all forced to come into this world without consent. . . We are forced to grow up and get old, go to school, work, find a purpose in life, experience millions of changes, and die. . . So why is life forced on us? Why don't we get a choice to be born or not? Why we have to experience all of life's challenges if we never consented to them? . . . Life isn't for everybody. Not all of us have passions and not all of us want to face the challenges.
Your observation exposes a fascinating philosophical question about the nature of identity and existence. You ask "[w]hy don't we get a choice to be born or not?" and assert that "[l]ife isn't for everybody." But do we exist before we are born? Who is that "everybody" you speak of? Out of all of the possible combinations of human beings that could be conceived, almost none of them come to fruition. So, how are we to think of these non-conceived theoretical humans? If they "count" (putting aside the obvious problems that accompanies such a theory) then what were the odds that any of us would be conceived rather than forever relegated to the category of non-conceived theoretical humans, where almost all possible "humans" remain? It must be like 1 in a quintillion or something even crazier. Wow, right? If I was "lucky" enough to be conceived, why won't I ever be "lucky" enough to win the lottery, which one has a much higher chance of doing than being born in the first place. Does this make sense to anyone or am I crazy (or both)?