Page 1 of 4 [ 59 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Scoots5012
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 1 Jul 2004
Age: 45
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,397
Location: Cedar Rapids Iowa

11 Oct 2005, 7:22 pm

http://www.newsmax.com/archives/article ... 4817.shtml

Quote:
The Triumph of Ideology Over Reality
Paul Craig Roberts

Not content with the terrorist-breeding instability he caused by invading Iraq, President Bush is plotting with Israel to repeat the disaster in Syria.

The diplomatic editor of the London Telegraph reported on Oct. 5 that the United States is aiming at Syrian "regime change." The British newspaper quotes Israeli defense minister Shaul Mofaz as saying that a report blaming Syria for the assassination of a former Lebanese government official will be the catalyst that starts the ball rolling. Mofaz says the report will be the pretext for Bush to impose sanctions on Syria, "beginning with economic sanctions and moving on to others."

The Israeli newspaper, Haaretz, reported on Oct. 3 that the Bush administration has asked Israel's government to recommend a successor for Syrian president Bashar al Assad. No doubt, the Bush administration will describe Israel's selection of Syria's new president as the workings of democracy.

The Stratfor Intelligence Brief reported on Oct. 5 that Bush's National Security Council is deciding whether to bomb Syrian villages along what are thought to be "the infiltration routes used by jihadists" and to have U.S. Special Forces conduct operations inside Syrian territory.

Obviously, far from heeding demands from U.S. generals and congressional members of his own political party for a plan to withdraw from Iraq, Bush intends to widen the war.

How can Bush, his National Security Council and Israel be so blind to the consequences of destabilizing Syria? A CIA report concluded that the U.S. invasion of Iraq created a training ground for Al-Qaida. Doesn't Bush understand that creating chaos in Syria will have the same result?

The National Security Council needs to quickly consult some real Middle East experts before Bush's reckless policies in the face of seething anti-American sentiment cause the overthrow of U.S. puppet rulers in Egypt, Jordan and Pakistan, and dethrone the princes ruling the American oil protectorates in the Middle East.

If the Bush administration cannot defeat insurgency in Iraq, how can it defeat insurgency in Iraq and Syria? In Iraq, Syria and Iran? The Bush administration is fanatical, divorced from reality.

Last week, Lt. Gen. William Odom, former director of the National Security Agency, said that Bush's invasion of Iraq was "the greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history." This is quite a distinction for Bush and his government. Are the morons now going to double the distinction by attacking Syria and quadruple it by attacking Iran?

Why don't Congress and the American public understand that the United States cannot afford to worsen the disaster in which it finds itself?

Nothing better illustrates the reality-denying capability of the Bush administration than Secretary of State Condi Rice's speech at Princeton University on Sept. 30. It is a fantasy speech, devoid of awareness that "regime change" in Iraq substituted Shi'ite clergy for a secular ruler. The U.S. secretary of state has no inkling of the conflict generated between Shi'ite, Sunni and Kurd by the U.S.-imposed attempt to produce and adopt a constitution.

The Bush administration's Middle East policy is the triumph of ideology over reality. Something must be done to stop Bush before he mimics in the Middle East Hitler's invasion of Russia. The American people cannot afford the blood and treasure that the fanatical Bush administration is willing to squander.

What can be done about a president who is immune to reason? A bill of impeachment is a good start.

The Bush administration has already done more damage to Americans than the Sept. 11 attacks. The American people and their congressional representatives must hold Bush accountable before it is too late. The Bush administration has no intention of stopping with Iraq. At Princeton, Condi Rice again declared the administration's intention to use U.S. military force to transform the societies in the Middle East. "Now is not the time to falter or fade," declared the U.S. secretary of state.

Such total oblivion to the "greatest strategic disaster in U.S. history" is far more scary than Muslim terrorists.

COPYRIGHT 2005 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.


_________________
I live my life to prove wrong those who said I couldn't make it in life...


Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

11 Oct 2005, 7:34 pm

I've been saying since 9/11 that if we are ever going to defeat the terrorists, we must attack Syria, Iraq, Lybia (neutralized peacefully), Iran, Palestine, and Saudi Arabia. Saudi Arabia isn't quite as big of a terrorist supporter since the terrorists betrayed them, but still something needs to be done about them. Syria is already one of the world's biggest terrorist breeding grounds, so you are not going to make matters worse by taking out the camps and leadership in a swift blow. Yeah, there's going to be insurgency, but they already have that mentality in Syria.



kevv729
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: SOUTH DAKOTA

12 Oct 2005, 12:01 am

I think Syria will not be invaded especially while we are in Iraq. Iran is more of a problem than Syria is in this world. Especially if they get nuclear weapons. Even though Syria is terrorist state, with terrorist camps. Syria also has pulled out of Lebanon this makes political power even less. Syria will need to change from within as long as President Assad is power it will go no were in the future it lives in the past.



Mithrandir
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 18 Oct 2004
Age: 38
Gender: Male
Posts: 614
Location: Victoria, BC Canada

12 Oct 2005, 12:59 am

I think covert warfare combined with negotiations will have a far better outcome.
The US is oustretched at the moment with just Iraq, and yet the Administration wants to attack Syria too?
Its either UN agrees or Syria will be the last straw.



theSPECTRE
Toucan
Toucan

User avatar

Joined: 24 Aug 2004
Gender: Male
Posts: 260
Location: USA PA

12 Oct 2005, 2:04 am

I think we spend to much time and money baby sitting iraq :roll:


_________________
In this country. You gotta have the money. Then when you get the money you get the power. Then when you get the power, you get the woman.

-Tony Mantanna
-Scarface

Say Good Night to the bad guy - Tony Montana
-Scarface


jb814
Deinonychus
Deinonychus

User avatar

Joined: 3 Aug 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 309
Location: Glasgow Scotland

12 Oct 2005, 4:26 am

Well, you're going to spend a lot more. According to the Asian press the rate at which the Iraqi police and army are being packed with militia members (they get free training, pay and weapons instea of providing their own) and infiltrated by insurgents is growing really fast. There are reports of police/army death squads, and even the the military spokesmen who put such a spin on things admit they can't trust the iraqi services for anything.



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

12 Oct 2005, 4:50 am

Bush needs to be impeached! He is a complete imperial nutter.

What right has he got to walk into other people's countries and tell them how to do things.



Sean
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 3 Apr 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 3,505

12 Oct 2005, 5:20 am

RobertN wrote:
Bush needs to be impeached! He is a complete imperial nutter.

What right has he got to walk into other people's countries and tell them how to do things.

When those countries support groups that blow people and things up, and try to tell other people how to do things. They are the ones that need to leave people alone, not Bush. The Israelis have been screaming for a couple of years now that Saddam moved his WMDs into Syria anyway.



kevv729
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: SOUTH DAKOTA

12 Oct 2005, 7:08 am

RobertN wrote:
Bush needs to be impeached! He is a complete imperial nutter.

What right has he got to walk into other people's countries and tell them how to do things.
You are wrong in all of this. RobertN



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

12 Oct 2005, 7:08 am

Quote:
When those countries support groups that blow people and things up,


Funny, I thought you liked to blow things up.



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

12 Oct 2005, 7:10 am

kevv729 wrote:
RobertN wrote:
Bush needs to be impeached! He is a complete imperial nutter.

What right has he got to walk into other people's countries and tell them how to do things.
You are wrong in all of this. RobertN


Give me some hard evidence, Kev, that suggest my points are invalid, instead of coming out with lame comments like that.

You say I am wrong. Evidence????



kevv729
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: SOUTH DAKOTA

12 Oct 2005, 7:18 am

I am going to bed ok.



kevv729
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: SOUTH DAKOTA

12 Oct 2005, 1:39 pm

RobertN

Bush believes in what he is doing right or wrong he is doing it he was elected by the People of the U.S. and will be in Office to 2009. That is up to the Americans to decide if they want to impeach him.

Saddam Hussein was a crazier nutter than Bush has been, Saddam should have been taken out of office in 1991, but it was not done by the UN or former President Bush.

I am not saying Bush is right or wrong but his is the elected President of the U.S.A.

As long as we have Republicans majorities in the Congress he well not get impeached.



RobertN
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 30 Jul 2005
Age: 39
Gender: Male
Posts: 934
Location: Cambridge, UK

12 Oct 2005, 2:56 pm

Just because the Beast holds power in the White House (and beyond) doesn't mean we should accept his judgement as right.

Bush has two aspects to his life, political and business.

Obviously, he will use what power he has as President to enhance his businesses (mainly oil). After all, why isn't the US tightening up on Environmental Laws? Why - because it will hurt the oil industry!!

Business pays a lot more than politics, unfortunately. Bush is paid $500,000 dollars by the State to run the country. However he earns ten times that through his business links. Which of these interests is he going to put first - some measly 0.5 Million dollar post, or multi-million dollar business interests? Who's ya daddy, eh?

Also, during election campaigns, Bush is paid many millions of dollars in "donations" by Big Business to grant policies favourable to them e.g. lower corporation tax. Such policies are not usually favoured by poor or even middle-class Americans, who need public schools for their kids, social security if they fall ill, and emergency services for disasters like Katrina. Corporate-friendly policies usually come at a cost of ordinary citizens.



kevv729
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 22 Sep 2005
Age: 61
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,872
Location: SOUTH DAKOTA

12 Oct 2005, 3:26 pm

RobertN

Bush is not a King.

He does not make the Laws in America Congress does.

It is to bad that there are so many Lobbists that lobby the Congress.

Nothing is perfected in this world, not any leader from any country.

It is to bad many blame him for all the wrongs of this world.



eamonn
Veteran
Veteran

User avatar

Joined: 8 Jul 2005
Gender: Male
Posts: 2,301
Location: Scotland

12 Oct 2005, 3:39 pm

Some people blame Bush. I dont. He's just a w*ker, we on the other hand are governed by w*kers. Cant even find decent leaders to be governed by. We're ruled by effete a***holes. It's a shite state of affairs to be in, kevv, and all the politics debating on wp wont make any f*****g difference! I liberally borrowed some lines from a movie there and changed them a little.